Poll

Should the ownership looking for new GM?

Yes
No

Author Topic: Should the ownership looking for new GM?  (Read 9720 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Should the ownership looking for new GM?
« Reply #60 on: June 24, 2013, 05:51:59 PM »

Offline eugen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1258
  • Tommy Points: 40
Are you nuts?  Danny Ainge is easily a top GM in this league.  Dude took a dump of a franchise who hadn't contended for close to two decades... turned them into a title contender in a little over 4 years.  Kept them relevant for another 4ish years.  Dude trades his own coach for an unprotected 1st.  He's a mastermind. 

He's a "mastermind"...Wooow. Why Doc is gona than leaving the mastermind alone?

Re: Should the ownership looking for new GM?
« Reply #61 on: June 24, 2013, 05:57:07 PM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10764
  • Tommy Points: 1196
Really not sure this thread is going in a good direction

Ignorant
Nuts
Delusional
Bandwagon.

I happen to think Ainge is an excellent GM but I can see where people would be fairly critical of him as well. Not sure you have to be ignorant, nuts, delusional or a bandwagoneer to come to that conclusion.

Did you read any of the OP other posts in this thread? They literally make zero sense , I mean if you can even make out what he is trying to say in that scrambled writing.

Re: Should the ownership looking for new GM?
« Reply #62 on: June 24, 2013, 05:57:35 PM »

Offline blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19695
  • Tommy Points: 1623
But is that enough? How much champion title from 2007 till now, under Doc epoch, would have gotten Cs team with another GM like Pat Riley for example? If you answer this question you will find a reasonable way to admit the truth. In 2001 this GM send out our best big guy, Perkins. As the result Cs lost 1st seed @East and got eliminated by Miami Heat. Waiving Ray for zero money, one of the best snipers of the NBA. And do not forget the catastrophically money management when ate age of 35 this GM offer PP 15.5 mill/season (?) So, defending a GM who is not doing a good job for a long time, is not fair…


There are a lot of errors in this post.  Let me correct some of them for you, since you are having a hard time with the facts.

1) It wasn't 2001 that DA traded Perk, it was 2011
2) Trading perk in 2011 wasn't a huge factor in where we ended seed wise.  Perk was still recovering from ACL surgery and wasn't a difference maker in our record.  A bigger impact was resting starters down the stretch.
3) DA didn't waive RA.  He was a free agent.  This is a really basic thing you should understand.  Ray Allen choose to go to the Heat because he was a free agent.  DA offered him a larger contract thank Miami so it had nothing to do with DA at all.

Re: Should the ownership looking for new GM?
« Reply #63 on: June 24, 2013, 05:58:49 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Personal attacks aren't allowed, cut them out.

Also disagreeing with another poster isn't abusive either, lets all be respectful. Because right now I'm going to end up suspending multiple parties if this stuff doesn't get cleaned up.

Re: Should the ownership looking for new GM?
« Reply #64 on: June 24, 2013, 06:03:36 PM »

Offline eugen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1258
  • Tommy Points: 40
I'm completely ashamed of the 10+ "fans' who voted yes.  I wonder if it correlates to how long you've been a fan. 

For how long you've been a fan of DA or Cs team? Ashemed? No really. During the poll before Februaray trade line: Trade Rondo for Howard, 75% of people said yes. You did not mention being ashemed or not.

Re: Should the ownership looking for new GM?
« Reply #65 on: June 24, 2013, 06:07:11 PM »

Offline eugen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1258
  • Tommy Points: 40
Really not sure this thread is going in a good direction

Ignorant
Nuts
Delusional
Bandwagon.

I happen to think Ainge is an excellent GM but I can see where people would be fairly critical of him as well. Not sure you have to be ignorant, nuts, delusional or a bandwagoneer to come to that conclusion.

Did you read any of the OP other posts in this thread? They literally make zero sense , I mean if you can even make out what he is trying to say in that scrambled writing.

no

ridiculous thread