Rondo outplayed the MVP of the league in that series. That's why we won.
Well, we're not playing the MVP of the league in this series, so who cares?
Right, we're only playing the league's leading scorer (who happens to have grown into a very capable defender and solid rebounder). Melo is not the best player in the league, but he's certainly one of the very best, and he's a legitimate MVP candidate this season.
If you want to make the comparison between that 2010 series and this one, you have to tell me who on our team is going to play like an MVP candidate for the next 4-6 games.
I'll take our teamwork over the MVP candidate, Carmelo. With a team effort, I believe we can beat the Knicks.
Of course, if we don't play cohesively, we might get sent fishing in 5. We need everyone firing on all cylinders for these next few games; Carmelo is a great player, and we'll need everybody clicking to gut out a win.
Well, you make a good point -- the Celtics in 2010 were a much better TEAM than the Cavs, which was a big part of why they won.
My position is that the Knicks are a better team than the Celtics this season, though. They are a better built, more versatile team. Yes, they rely on outside shooting to score, but they defend well, they have good rebounders, they have good passers, they have a bunch of veterans with lots of playoff experience.
It's pretty hard to find many areas where the Celtics have a decided edge over the Knicks in terms of personnel, honestly. Rondo was that X-Factor who could take over a game and lift the Celtics to another level. All along I've been saying since Rondo went down that losing him was most important for the playoffs because it meant we didn't have that x-factor anymore.
Green can step up and have a great half, or even a great game as he did against Miami. But when he's playing great and scoring he doesn't bring half as much to the table as Rondo does when he's dominating.