Author Topic: Trade for Trae Young?  (Read 3880 times)

tazzmaniac, Moranis and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Trade for Trae Young?
« Reply #15 on: Yesterday at 06:39:26 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34702
  • Tommy Points: 1603
Boston should expend assets on a position of need, not a position of strength. If they expend the assets it should be for a big man, not another small player. 

Trae is the modern Iverson, but with much worse defense (and it isn't like Iverson was a good defender).  He can work in the right system and as the focal point, but he wouldn't work on Boston.

So as I said above. NO.


 Sorry when did iverson avg 11.5 assists per game? He never did.
no but he did average 8 for a team that scored just 99 ppg. His AST% was in the upper 30's which is lower than Trae who is in the mid 40's, but not so much less that the comparison doesnt work.  That is why I said a modern version of Iverson.  Faster paced game, but pretty inefficient as a scorer and a ball hog. Maybe Marbury works better as a comparison. That is the type of player Young is except not as good as AI.  There is a reason that woth all the assists and points Trae has a pretty small WS.  He is simply inefficient and not very impactful.

Atlanta is finally starting to build a team around his strengths so maybe his efficiency picks up this year and the Hawks get back to the ECF tram they were a few years ago before they started tinkering woth the team too much.  The Murray trade was an unmitigated disaster that was doomed to fail. They are finally correcting that.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: Trade for Trae Young?
« Reply #16 on: Yesterday at 06:59:07 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8687
  • Tommy Points: 1138
Boston should expend assets on a position of need, not a position of strength. If they expend the assets it should be for a big man, not another small player. 

Trae is the modern Iverson, but with much worse defense (and it isn't like Iverson was a good defender).  He can work in the right system and as the focal point, but he wouldn't work on Boston.

So as I said above. NO.


 Sorry when did iverson avg 11.5 assists per game? He never did.
no but he did average 8 for a team that scored just 99 ppg. His AST% was in the upper 30's which is lower than Trae who is in the mid 40's, but not so much less that the comparison doesnt work.  That is why I said a modern version of Iverson.  Faster paced game, but pretty inefficient as a scorer and a ball hog. Maybe Marbury works better as a comparison. That is the type of player Young is except not as good as AI.  There is a reason that woth all the assists and points Trae has a pretty small WS.  He is simply inefficient and not very impactful.

Atlanta is finally starting to build a team around his strengths so maybe his efficiency picks up this year and the Hawks get back to the ECF tram they were a few years ago before they started tinkering woth the team too much.  The Murray trade was an unmitigated disaster that was doomed to fail. They are finally correcting that.


 He's a top 3 passer im.the world. Better shooter than iverson from.the field,  from 3 point range and shoots 87% from the line.

 Offensively he's better than iverson.

Re: Trade for Trae Young?
« Reply #17 on: Yesterday at 11:26:58 PM »

Offline tenn_smoothie

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7165
  • Tommy Points: 845
Can you imagine the disaster that a Mazzulla/Trae Young offense would be ?
The Four Celtic Generals:
Russell - Cowens - Bird - Garnett

The Four Celtic Lieutenants:
Cousy - Havlicek - McHale - Pierce

Re: Trade for Trae Young?
« Reply #18 on: Yesterday at 11:57:50 PM »

Offline ETNCeltics

  • NCE
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2748
  • Tommy Points: 311

 Simoms, Hauser, Prichard gets you to 45 million. Serious draft capital needed as well. If young agrees to pick up his player option to Play with Tatum, Brown,  and White the following season.

 Would you consider this trade? I've always felt like Tatum and Brown need an elite passer and although Traes defence is bad,  have to admit he's one of the best passers in the World.

 He could really take the offense to another level, and obviously fits right end shooting the three point ball with lots of volume.

Queta
Tatum
Brown
White
Young

 We are one big man away from title town.

His defense isn't just bad, he's one of the worst defenders in history. No thanks.

Re: Trade for Trae Young?
« Reply #19 on: Today at 07:13:51 AM »

Offline BitterJim

  • NGT
  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9186
  • Tommy Points: 1238
If we were gonna send picks and players to the Hawks for one of their pieces, I'd much rather have Okongwu than Trae.

Trae is the better player, but Okongwu is a way better fit and would be a perfect Celtic. The kicker, though, is that neither is available (nor should they be)
I'm bitter.

Re: Trade for Trae Young?
« Reply #20 on: Today at 08:09:05 AM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8687
  • Tommy Points: 1138
If we were gonna send picks and players to the Hawks for one of their pieces, I'd much rather have Okongwu than Trae.

Trae is the better player, but Okongwu is a way better fit and would be a perfect Celtic. The kicker, though, is that neither is available (nor should they be)


 Hawks don't want to pay Ice Trey the big bucks.  That's why its a possibility.

Re: Trade for Trae Young?
« Reply #21 on: Today at 09:32:46 AM »

Online tazzmaniac

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9025
  • Tommy Points: 583
If we were gonna send picks and players to the Hawks for one of their pieces, I'd much rather have Okongwu than Trae.

Trae is the better player, but Okongwu is a way better fit and would be a perfect Celtic. The kicker, though, is that neither is available (nor should they be)

 Hawks don't want to pay Ice Trey the big bucks.  That's why its a possibility.
If the Hawks who know Young best aren't willing to pay him the big bucks, why should the Celtics do so?  Celts can't even afford it with JT, JB and White on the books whereas the Hawks can afford it. 

Re: Trade for Trae Young?
« Reply #22 on: Today at 12:48:51 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8891
  • Tommy Points: 290
If you had a strong defensive big man and more bench options I'd do a deal. Cs depth isnt good any more nor their bigs.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:57:26 PM by Csfan1984 »