Author Topic: Trade for Trae Young?  (Read 700 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Trade for Trae Young?
« Reply #15 on: Today at 06:39:26 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34699
  • Tommy Points: 1603
Boston should expend assets on a position of need, not a position of strength. If they expend the assets it should be for a big man, not another small player. 

Trae is the modern Iverson, but with much worse defense (and it isn't like Iverson was a good defender).  He can work in the right system and as the focal point, but he wouldn't work on Boston.

So as I said above. NO.


 Sorry when did iverson avg 11.5 assists per game? He never did.
no but he did average 8 for a team that scored just 99 ppg. His AST% was in the upper 30's which is lower than Trae who is in the mid 40's, but not so much less that the comparison doesnt work.  That is why I said a modern version of Iverson.  Faster paced game, but pretty inefficient as a scorer and a ball hog. Maybe Marbury works better as a comparison. That is the type of player Young is except not as good as AI.  There is a reason that woth all the assists and points Trae has a pretty small WS.  He is simply inefficient and not very impactful.

Atlanta is finally starting to build a team around his strengths so maybe his efficiency picks up this year and the Hawks get back to the ECF tram they were a few years ago before they started tinkering woth the team too much.  The Murray trade was an unmitigated disaster that was doomed to fail. They are finally correcting that.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: Trade for Trae Young?
« Reply #16 on: Today at 06:59:07 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8686
  • Tommy Points: 1138
Boston should expend assets on a position of need, not a position of strength. If they expend the assets it should be for a big man, not another small player. 

Trae is the modern Iverson, but with much worse defense (and it isn't like Iverson was a good defender).  He can work in the right system and as the focal point, but he wouldn't work on Boston.

So as I said above. NO.


 Sorry when did iverson avg 11.5 assists per game? He never did.
no but he did average 8 for a team that scored just 99 ppg. His AST% was in the upper 30's which is lower than Trae who is in the mid 40's, but not so much less that the comparison doesnt work.  That is why I said a modern version of Iverson.  Faster paced game, but pretty inefficient as a scorer and a ball hog. Maybe Marbury works better as a comparison. That is the type of player Young is except not as good as AI.  There is a reason that woth all the assists and points Trae has a pretty small WS.  He is simply inefficient and not very impactful.

Atlanta is finally starting to build a team around his strengths so maybe his efficiency picks up this year and the Hawks get back to the ECF tram they were a few years ago before they started tinkering woth the team too much.  The Murray trade was an unmitigated disaster that was doomed to fail. They are finally correcting that.


 He's a top 3 passer im.the world. Better shooter than iverson from.the field,  from 3 point range and shoots 87% from the line.

 Offensively he's better than iverson.