What can tell tonight people who missed Rondo 
Honestly, Euge, what does this even mean? Seriously. Explain it. In depth. The Celtics won a game. We are probably all happy about that around here.
Did you watch this game and come away with the conclusion that they would have lost this game had Rondo been playing? It is pretty conclusive the team is better with Rondo. I understand you don't think so, but you have also never, ever backed that up with any statistics or tangible proof. But, please, do inform how the Celtics would have lost this game with Rondo. And do add how he would not have helped in any other game in this series that the Celtics lost. As of now your whole posting history is snide comments about Rondo with zero facts to back up any of your assertions.
Why revive this thread to apparently gloat about Rondo being injured after a win that all around here wanted and enjoy? Is it enough that everyone on The Celtics says they wish they had Rondo around, that they like playing with him and think he makes them better. That everyone interviewed about what The C's should do said it was imperative to build around Rondo? But, please, do go on using a gutsy win to bash Rondo when no one besides yourself thinks they won because Rondo was out and not despite Rondo being out. You are a broken record and not a good record at that.