I can't help but mention it --
Could Bradley be the team's leader going forward, as opposed to Rondo? Does Bradley's emerging leadership make Rondo more expendable?
I think I'd err on the side of "no, it doesn't," but it's something to think about.
Maybe a team led by Rondo and a team that embodies Bradley's defensive intensity are not mutually exclusive. But I can't help wondering if it enters into the team's thinking about whether to keep Rondo.
I don't think he'll be the leader of the team. He'll always just be a defensive role player, but I think I like the idea of him as starting PG. I had a thread about this a few weeks ago... this league is littered with elite scoring point guards. If you can't land one of those elite scoring point guards, it seems the next big thing would to be have an elite defensive role playing point guard to counteract half the league. A beautiful example of this just happened against Steph Curry.
Rondo is not a scorer at all. His skillset is interesting, but not something you build a champion around. I think leaving Bradley at starting PG and trading Rondo to the highest bidder makes a lot of sense. Granted, you aren't winning a title unless Bradley is your 5th best starter, but he's a good cog to have and he's definitely not a shooting guard (weak offensively and far too small to play the position long term).
It makes the most sense to shop Rondo for the highest package. Thing is... that's exactly what Ainge has been doing essentially every single year and it turns out that Rondo's not all that valuable on the trade market. So we'll more than likely just hang onto him.