Author Topic: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?  (Read 16048 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #30 on: September 21, 2012, 12:50:54 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
The only other guy I can think of is Baron Davis.  His size might make him a better fit with Bradley or Terry. 

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #31 on: September 21, 2012, 12:51:35 PM »

Offline relja

  • Anfernee Simons
  • Posts: 375
  • Tommy Points: 31
  • heart, hustle and muscle
Give Iverson a chance as a 3rd string combo-guard.. He may be washed up but he is at least better than D-Fish.
When you lose, the easy part is to see who gives up. Giving up is very simple. You basically take your stuff and walk away. To continue to work and to continue to compete is one of the most difficult things, especially when you really don't have anything - KG

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #32 on: September 21, 2012, 12:51:53 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
The only other guy I can think of is Baron Davis.  His size might make him a better fit with Bradley or Terry.
No, I'm tired of signing guys who can't play anymore.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #33 on: September 21, 2012, 12:54:46 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34127
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Give Iverson a chance as a 3rd string combo-guard.. He may be washed up but he is at least better than D-Fish.


How many years does a guy need to be out of the league with no team showing any interest in them before we stop hearing about them?

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #34 on: September 21, 2012, 01:01:33 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
If the Celtics need to add a reserve point guard, I would rather bring in a couple of D-Leaguers to compete for the job in training camp than sign someone like Derek Fisher.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #35 on: September 21, 2012, 01:01:39 PM »

Offline Interceptor

  • NCE
  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1970
  • Tommy Points: 224
How many years does a guy need to be out of the league with no team showing any interest in them before we stop hearing about them?
Not sure.

Incidentally, anyone think that 'Toine is available?

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #36 on: September 21, 2012, 01:02:50 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
I'd rather let Terry play as the backup PG until Avery get's back then let them share ball handling responsibilities with the second unit. I'd also like to see what Christmas can do, I know the kid can shoot and space the floor nicely but I THINK he could be capable of being a backup PG.

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #37 on: September 21, 2012, 01:28:55 PM »

Offline Celts Fan 92

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1423
  • Tommy Points: 122
rofl @ Baron Davis where was yall at when his kneecap popped outta place? i kno most of yall only pay attention to strictly Celtics but Baron prolly  wont play again period

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #38 on: September 21, 2012, 01:57:17 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32935
  • Tommy Points: 846
  • Larry Bird for President
give me jonny flynn.

Bradley is not even close to being a PG..Doc said so himself...JET needs to be a scorer...not facilitator...


Christmas? come on...he is a D leaguer who will never get off the bench if he makes the team. No chance he suddenly turns into a viable option at PG

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #39 on: September 21, 2012, 01:59:28 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 643
give me jonny flynn.

Bradley is not even close to being a PG..Doc said so himself...JET needs to be a scorer...not facilitator...

I don't think they will have a traditional PG when Rondo is out of the game.  They will run the ball a lot more through the post, and go to more of a ball movement offense.  I think you will see guys like KG, Pierce, Jeff Green, and potentially even Sully, being the facilitators in the high and low post.  Almost like the Princeton offense.

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #40 on: September 21, 2012, 02:01:51 PM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
Its not exactly a gaping hole. Bradley and Terry are just as much of a point guard as dooling. Dooling was basically Eddie House with worse 3 point shooting and better defense
Oh, but it _is_ a gaping hole. Not because we don't have PGs, but because we don't have enough bodies. At least not enough to start the season.

On opening day, your backcourt consists of Rondo, Terry, and Courtney Lee.

Your third string PG/SG is either Smith or Christmas. And then you have no-one. This is simply not enough. Especially given we have no solid grasp of how long Bradley will be out, or what he will look like when he's finally back.

Yeah I guess that is a short rotation and projects Lee and Terry averaging 30+ a game which might not be ideal to start the season.

Wish we had a better grasp on Bradley situation. No idea when he will be able to come back and how much rust he will have. We (including me) are putting a lot of weight into a very young guy coming back from injury who is still fairly unproven

Worst case scenario, Bradley is out/hurt/unproductive.

In that case Lee is starting and our backup "PG" will be playing most of his minutes with Terry.

You need someone who can set up the offense, and is big enough to cross-match on D. Christmas fills the bill there in theory, but we will have to see what he really brings to the table.

But I think these other guys like Flynn, Bibby, Fisher etc. are all too small, and terrible defensively. Who covers Wade?

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #41 on: September 21, 2012, 02:02:32 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32935
  • Tommy Points: 846
  • Larry Bird for President
certainly going to be interesting on how Doc molds his rotations.

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #42 on: September 21, 2012, 02:06:07 PM »

Offline 2short

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6080
  • Tommy Points: 428
I'm not worried about bradley getting pg minutes with pierce around, rondo goes out pierce can easily run an offense.
I don't think we need to rush to sign anyone, let christmas see what he can do for training camp/start of season as a 3rd string pg (what 5 minutes a game?).  Once bradley is back, rondo,bradley and terry is good pg depth. Leave the space open for a buyout vet etc.

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #43 on: September 21, 2012, 02:08:35 PM »

Offline CelticG1

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Tommy Points: 288
Its not exactly a gaping hole. Bradley and Terry are just as much of a point guard as dooling. Dooling was basically Eddie House with worse 3 point shooting and better defense
Oh, but it _is_ a gaping hole. Not because we don't have PGs, but because we don't have enough bodies. At least not enough to start the season.

On opening day, your backcourt consists of Rondo, Terry, and Courtney Lee.

Your third string PG/SG is either Smith or Christmas. And then you have no-one. This is simply not enough. Especially given we have no solid grasp of how long Bradley will be out, or what he will look like when he's finally back.

Yeah I guess that is a short rotation and projects Lee and Terry averaging 30+ a game which might not be ideal to start the season.

Wish we had a better grasp on Bradley situation. No idea when he will be able to come back and how much rust he will have. We (including me) are putting a lot of weight into a very young guy coming back from injury who is still fairly unproven

Worst case scenario, Bradley is out/hurt/unproductive.

In that case Lee is starting and our backup "PG" will be playing most of his minutes with Terry.

You need someone who can set up the offense, and is big enough to cross-match on D. Christmas fills the bill there in theory, but we will have to see what he really brings to the table.

But I think these other guys like Flynn, Bibby, Fisher etc. are all too small, and terrible defensively. Who covers Wade?

Ha that's a terrible worst case. We are kinda screwed without bradley

Re: Dooling out, how about Derek Fisher or Pietrus?
« Reply #44 on: September 21, 2012, 02:09:30 PM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
Give Iverson a chance as a 3rd string combo-guard.. He may be washed up but he is at least better than D-Fish.


How many years does a guy need to be out of the league with no team showing any interest in them before we stop hearing about them?

3-5, unless the guy used to play for the Celtics. Then, 10.

In that vein I just found myself Googling Orien Greene. That is how slim the PG pickings are right now.