So, we've finally got three minutes to respond.
The fact of the matter is, this is probably over. Giving IP the unrebutted chance to put on his smoke and mirrors display pretty much destroyed whatever chance we had.
That said, a few things to say about IP's presentation:
* Two games isn't a "sample size", especially when Kyrie Irving played 19 minutes in one of those games as Cleveland very blatantly tanked down the stretch.
Let's look at the two players' bodies of work:
Kyrie Irving: 18.5 points, 5.4 assists, 3.7 rebounds, 46.9% FG%, 39.9% 3PT%, .517 eFG%, .566 TS%
Jrue Holiday: 13.5 points, 4.5 assists, 3.3 rebounds, 43.2% FG%, 38.0% 3PT%, .471 eFG%, .496 TS%
Only in the CelticsBlog draft would it be argued that Holiday is better than Irving. He's inferior across the board, in every single category. Heck, a .496 TS% is borderline terrible, and yet people are lapping up the spew that IP is throwing out there.
IP says that Holiday is young and improving. That's blatantly false. Holiday's production decreased last year in terms of points, assists, rebounds, FG%, FT%, eFG%, and TS%. That's not the sign of an improving player.
Kyrie Irving was the most clutch 4th quarter player in the NBA last year. He had the best season by a rookie PG since Chris Paul, and the most efficient season by a scoring guard since Michael Jordan. He is significantly better than Jrue Holiday. What do you trust more, a 50 - 60 game sample size, or two games where Irving didn't get minutes?
Oh, and let's not credit Holiday's defense too much. He's got the second best defensive SF in the league playing beside him, taking the tough assignments. He's got a top-five defensive big man behind him in Elton Brand. It's Philly's team defense that deserves credit, not the vastly overrated Jrue Holiday.