Last time I checked he was hitting huge three point shots to tie games and win games for the Celtics when the chips were down.
In the past, although his latest move was leaving both money + security on the table for a new jersey with his old number on it.
He did EXACTLY what he said he would do. Hesaid he would sign his next contract based on his and his family's needs.
Let's review, based on what we know:
- 2 years, 6 million a year in Boston: not adequate for his and his family's needs
- 2 years, 6 million a year in Boston, maybe a no-trade or a trade kicker: not adequate for his and his family's needs
- 1 + 1 years, 3 million a year in Miami: adequate for his and his family's needs, evidenced by fact that this is where he wound up ultimately.
- 3 years, 9 million a year in Boston: ostensibly adequate for his and his family's needs, since the offer came from him.
Bullet #4 is the sticky wicket. The only difference on the surface is the money and the years. Was it the money? Was it the extra year? Was it a false rumor, one repeated by the owner? It bothers me.
He's made $178 million in his career. Add on endorsement money and his kids' kids should never have to work a day in their lives. Money wasn't the issue.
He wanted a better quality of life for him and his family and he thought he could get that in Miami. Perhaps his inner circle isn't saying anything because they support his decision?
Doc Rivers, supporting the heck out of Ray Allen:
When asked if he agreed with Allen’s reasons for signing with Miami, Rivers said, “No. But that doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter what I think. I just wish we could have found a way [to keep him] and we didn’t. I’ll always put [the blame] on us, that’s easier.”Of course, Doc is biased. But! It's possible that Allen is fine with getting beat on, and has a reason too personal to share publicly, or he is too much of a professional to air his dirty laundry.
And because this is possible, this means that I am wrong.
If you are mad because he went left and went to the Heat, that's understandable. But just that. This whole "Ray said this and did the opposite" or "Ray bad mouthed the Celtics" or any of this other stuff people are saying just isn't true and are not valid reasons to be angry with the guy.
How do you know? I find it kind of amazing that I get raked over the coals for suggesting that something is possible, but you get to assert for free that it's untrue.