Are people really going with Jeff Green here?
Sorry folks, but as much as we want Green to succeed, he is clearly not as talented or productive as Anderson. Anderson was a good rebounder, could stretch the floor, and played decent defense.
Green in his time here was a horrible rebounder, couldn't shoot, and was a passable defender. Green did literally nothing well and everything mediocre or worse.
Jeff Green got massively, disgustingly, embarrassingly overpaid and Anderson got paid about what he's worth, give or take.
How do you even come up with this nonsense?
You say Anderson was a good rebounder, streched the floor, and played decent defense and was paid fairly.
You say Green was a horrible rebounder, couldn't shoot, and was a passable defender and was way overpaid.
Did you actually
check their stats before making those claims?
----------------------------
Statistic - Anderson / Green
----------------------------
Off Reb% - 12.7% / 3.7%
Def Reb% - 14.8% / 13.8%
Total Reb% - 13.7% / 8.9%
Ass Ratio - 5.7 / 9.5
TO Ratio: - 6.04 / 8.73
--
Shooting
--
Inside - 56% / 66%
Close - 23% / 34%
Midrange - 32% / 40%
Corner 3 - 44% / 44%
Break 3 - 38% / 25%
So...
Rebounds
* Anderson's tot reb rate is dead on the 13.6% league average for a PF
* Green's tot reb rate is dead on the 9.0% league average for a SF
Passing
* Anderson's assist ratio is FAR below the 12.85 league average for a PF
* Green's assist ratio is below (but much closer to) the 15.99 league average for a SF
Turnovers
* Anderson's Turnover ratio is far below the 13.4 league average for a PF
* Green's turnover ratio is significantl below the 12.2 league average for a SF
Shooting - Inside
* Anderson's inside scoring percentage is FAR below the 64% league average for a PF
* Green's inside scoring percentage is above the 63% league average for a SF
Shooting - Close
* Anderson's close scoring percentage is FAR below the 39.2% average for a PF
* Green's close scoring percentage is slightly below the 35.5% league average for a SF
Shooting - Mid
* Anderson's midrange scoring percentage is far below the 39% league average for a PF
* Green's midrange scoring percentage is significantly above the 37% league average for a SF
In terms of 3PT shooting they are dead even from the corner, but Anderson is clearly far more accurate on above-the-break threes.
So looking at all of these numbers relative to the position they play, how on earth can you come to the above conclusions?
1. Clearly Jeff Green and Ryan Anderson are equally capable rebounders
relative to their primary position.
2. Anderson less prone to turnovers (he's good for top 90% in the league in that regard), but both players are elite in this regard.
3. Green is a better passer, with an assist ratio that's almost twice as good as Anderson's
4. Jeff Green is clearly a more versatile scorer then Anderson. The
only spot that Anderson is better from is above the break threes. On corner threes they shoot the exact same percentage, and from everywhere inside the 3PT line Anderson is horribly inefficient (while Green is consistently above average).
Call me crazy, but if it's costing me the same money I'd rather have the guy whos a better passer, can play multiple positions, is more athletic, and can score from anywhere on the court.