Jeff Green vs Ryan Anderson

[tonyto3690]

Are people really going with Jeff Green here?

Sorry folks, but as much as we want Green to succeed, he is clearly not as talented or productive as Anderson.  Anderson was a good rebounder, could stretch the floor, and played decent defense. 

Green in his time here was a horrible rebounder, couldn't shoot, and was a passable defender.  Green did literally nothing well and everything mediocre or worse.

Jeff Green got massively, disgustingly, embarrassingly overpaid and Anderson got paid about what he's worth, give or take.

How do you even come up with this nonsense?

You say Anderson was a good rebounder, streched the floor, and played decent defense and was paid fairly.

You say Green was a horrible rebounder, couldn't shoot, and was a passable defender and was way overpaid.

Did you actually check their stats before making those claims?

----------------------------
Statistic - Anderson / Green
----------------------------
Off Reb% - 12.7% / 3.7%
Def Reb% - 14.8% / 13.8%
Total Reb% - 13.7% / 8.9%
Ass Ratio - 5.7 / 9.5
TO Ratio: - 6.04 / 8.73
--
Shooting
--
Inside - 56% / 66%
Close -  23% / 34%
Midrange - 32% / 40%
Corner 3 - 44% / 44%
Break 3 - 38% / 25%

So...

Rebounds
* Anderson's tot reb rate is dead on the 13.6% league average for a PF
* Green's tot reb rate is dead on the 9.0% league average for a SF

Passing
* Anderson's assist ratio is FAR below the 12.85 league average for a PF
* Green's assist ratio is below (but much closer to) the 15.99 league average for a SF

Turnovers
* Anderson's Turnover ratio is far below the 13.4 league average for a PF
* Green's turnover ratio is significantl below the 12.2 league average for a SF

Shooting - Inside
* Anderson's inside scoring percentage is FAR below the 64% league average for a PF
* Green's inside scoring percentage is above the 63% league average for a SF

Shooting - Close
* Anderson's close scoring percentage is FAR below the 39.2% average for a PF
* Green's close scoring percentage is slightly below the 35.5% league average for a SF

Shooting - Mid
* Anderson's midrange scoring percentage is far below the 39% league average for a PF
* Green's midrange scoring percentage is significantly above the 37% league average for a SF

In terms of 3PT shooting they are dead even from the corner, but Anderson is clearly far more accurate on above-the-break threes.

So looking at all of these numbers relative to the position they play, how on earth can you come to the above conclusions?   

1. Clearly Jeff Green and Ryan Anderson are equally capable rebounders relative to their primary position.

2. Anderson less prone to turnovers (he's good for top 90% in the league in that regard), but both players are elite in this regard.

3. Green is a better passer, with an assist ratio that's almost twice as good as Anderson's

4. Jeff Green is clearly a more versatile scorer then Anderson.  The only spot that Anderson is better from is above the break threes.  On corner threes they shoot the exact same percentage, and from everywhere inside the 3PT line Anderson is horribly inefficient (while Green is consistently above average).

Call me crazy, but if it's costing me the same money I'd rather have the guy whos a better passer, can play multiple positions, is more athletic, and can score from anywhere on the court.

So what you're saying is that even when Anderson was competing for rebounds against Dwight freaking Howard and Green was competing against Kristic, Anderson got more rebounds, more frequently.

So what your'e saying is that even though Green was the #4 option on offense while Anderson was the #2 option, Anderson shot a higher percentage from everywhere besides dunking the ball.

So what you're saying is, Anderson was pretty much better in every way.

Thanks for spelling it out for us.  Twist your stats however you want, Anderson is the superior player by a long shot until Green actually does something to match the hype.

[myteamisbetterthanyours]

Are people really going with Jeff Green here?

Sorry folks, but as much as we want Green to succeed, he is clearly not as talented or productive as Anderson.  Anderson was a good rebounder, could stretch the floor, and played decent defense. 

Green in his time here was a horrible rebounder, couldn't shoot, and was a passable defender.  Green did literally nothing well and everything mediocre or worse.

Jeff Green got massively, disgustingly, embarrassingly overpaid and Anderson got paid about what he's worth, give or take.

How do you even come up with this nonsense?

You say Anderson was a good rebounder, streched the floor, and played decent defense and was paid fairly.

You say Green was a horrible rebounder, couldn't shoot, and was a passable defender and was way overpaid.

Did you actually check their stats before making those claims?

----------------------------
Statistic - Anderson / Green
----------------------------
Off Reb% - 12.7% / 3.7%
Def Reb% - 14.8% / 13.8%
Total Reb% - 13.7% / 8.9%
Ass Ratio - 5.7 / 9.5
TO Ratio: - 6.04 / 8.73
--
Shooting
--
Inside - 56% / 66%
Close -  23% / 34%
Midrange - 32% / 40%
Corner 3 - 44% / 44%
Break 3 - 38% / 25%

So...

Rebounds
* Anderson's tot reb rate is dead on the 13.6% league average for a PF
* Green's tot reb rate is dead on the 9.0% league average for a SF

Passing
* Anderson's assist ratio is FAR below the 12.85 league average for a PF
* Green's assist ratio is below (but much closer to) the 15.99 league average for a SF

Turnovers
* Anderson's Turnover ratio is far below the 13.4 league average for a PF
* Green's turnover ratio is significantl below the 12.2 league average for a SF

Shooting - Inside
* Anderson's inside scoring percentage is FAR below the 64% league average for a PF
* Green's inside scoring percentage is above the 63% league average for a SF

Shooting - Close
* Anderson's close scoring percentage is FAR below the 39.2% average for a PF
* Green's close scoring percentage is slightly below the 35.5% league average for a SF

Shooting - Mid
* Anderson's midrange scoring percentage is far below the 39% league average for a PF
* Green's midrange scoring percentage is significantly above the 37% league average for a SF

In terms of 3PT shooting they are dead even from the corner, but Anderson is clearly far more accurate on above-the-break threes.

So looking at all of these numbers relative to the position they play, how on earth can you come to the above conclusions?   

1. Clearly Jeff Green and Ryan Anderson are equally capable rebounders relative to their primary position.

2. Anderson less prone to turnovers (he's good for top 90% in the league in that regard), but both players are elite in this regard.

3. Green is a better passer, with an assist ratio that's almost twice as good as Anderson's

4. Jeff Green is clearly a more versatile scorer then Anderson.  The only spot that Anderson is better from is above the break threes.  On corner threes they shoot the exact same percentage, and from everywhere inside the 3PT line Anderson is horribly inefficient (while Green is consistently above average).

Call me crazy, but if it's costing me the same money I'd rather have the guy whos a better passer, can play multiple positions, is more athletic, and can score from anywhere on the court.

TP.. What this guy said. I would much rather have Jeff Green.

[action781]

I'll take green.

Hope his contract is something like 7.5, 8.5, 9.5, 10.5 = 36 over 4 years.

7.5 this year wouldn't hurt as much.

The maximum year-over-year percent change in salary for Green is 7.5% I think, so those numbers wouldn't work.

Ok good info. How do you know for sure tho?

Tp

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm

If it is 7.5% raises, then the contract will look like

$8.05M, $8.65M, $9.3M, $10M

So not too far off from your hopes

[apc]

Everyone in this league is overpaid!
Vet min for everyone!

[kozlodoev]

Except you have to consider the fact that Jeff Green has posted the bulk of those stats playing PF for the OKC. Nice try, though.

At least half his season was spent in Boston, and if you compare their playoff stats (where Green played mostly SF) his rebounding was actually EQUAL to Anderson's.

Most people are judging Green based on the stats he put up in Boston, coming off the bench, in a system he wasn't familliar with.

Yet in Boston he averaged about 15 points and 5 rebounds per 36 minutes adjusted, while shooting 48.5% from the field and 80% from the FT line.

If Green can give us those kind of numbers on a per-minute basis off the bench along with the athleticism to run with Rondo, the length and quickness to defend guys like Lebron/Carmello and the versatility to play multiple positions, then I'll be stoked.  Especially considering the potential upside he has learning from guys like Pierce, KG and Doc.

Anderson by comparison would pretty much give us nothing that we don't already get from Bass.  Instead of being a knock down midrange shooter, he's a knock down three point shooter.  Bass gives you a slightly lower rebound rate, but a higher assist rate.  Turnover rate is about dead even. Inside scoring rates are similar.  Bass is better physically (tougher, strong, more athletic). 

I'll always take guys who can play mulitple positions well over a guy who can play one position well, because if you get hit by injuries (which seems inevitable for Boston) those guys can fill in at mulitple positions.

I'm not saying Green is not the player I'd rather have -- just that this particular analysis is rather flawed.