Author Topic: Nets reportedly making progess in finding 3rd team to help them acquire Howard  (Read 15420 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62992
  • Tommy Points: -25466
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
PF - Kris Humphries, Tristan Thompson
C  - Anderson Varejao, Tyler Zeller

Why would New Jersey want to invest serious funds in Kris Humphries? I don't get it.

It puts him in the way of their top five pick last season + Hump isn't a particularly good fit alongside Varejao. I don't see where the value is here for Cleveland.

Wild guess here:

Humphries salary is necessary to make the D12 trade work.  However, Orlando has no interest in him.  So, Cleveland is volunteering to take on that salary in return for a draft pick.

The story makes it sound like Cleveland would be giving up a pick, but that makes no sense; they could just sign him outright, I believe, without giving up anything.  It makes a lot more sense, though, if Cleveland is getting a pick to take on a signed-and-traded Humphries (probably on a one year deal, plus two non-guaranteed seasons), especially since Cleveland needs to meet the salary cap floor. 


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
PF - Kris Humphries, Tristan Thompson
C  - Anderson Varejao, Tyler Zeller

Why would New Jersey want to invest serious funds in Kris Humphries? I don't get it.

It puts him in the way of their top five pick last season + Hump isn't a particularly good fit alongside Varejao. I don't see where the value is here for Cleveland.

Wild guess here:

Humphries salary is necessary to make the D12 trade work.  However, Orlando has no interest in him.  So, Cleveland is volunteering to take on that salary in return for a draft pick.

The story makes it sound like Cleveland would be giving up a pick, but that makes no sense; they could just sign him outright, I believe, without giving up anything.  It makes a lot more sense, though, if Cleveland is getting a pick to take on a signed-and-traded Humphries (probably on a one year deal, plus two non-guaranteed seasons), especially since Cleveland needs to meet the salary cap floor. 

So, presumably the Nets would give up four 1st rounders in this deal: three to ORL, and one to CLE for taking on Humphries?
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
PF - Kris Humphries, Tristan Thompson
C  - Anderson Varejao, Tyler Zeller

Why would New Jersey want to invest serious funds in Kris Humphries? I don't get it.

It puts him in the way of their top five pick last season + Hump isn't a particularly good fit alongside Varejao. I don't see where the value is here for Cleveland.

Wild guess here:

Humphries salary is necessary to make the D12 trade work.  However, Orlando has no interest in him.  So, Cleveland is volunteering to take on that salary in return for a draft pick.

The story makes it sound like Cleveland would be giving up a pick, but that makes no sense; they could just sign him outright, I believe, without giving up anything.  It makes a lot more sense, though, if Cleveland is getting a pick to take on a signed-and-traded Humphries (probably on a one year deal, plus two non-guaranteed seasons), especially since Cleveland needs to meet the salary cap floor. 

Is Hump a UFA or RFA?  Does it matter?  Doesn't he have to agree to go to Cleveland?  Why would he do that? 

This makes no sense.  NJ has no shot.

Offline action781

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 611
PF - Kris Humphries, Tristan Thompson
C  - Anderson Varejao, Tyler Zeller

Why would New Jersey want to invest serious funds in Kris Humphries? I don't get it.

It puts him in the way of their top five pick last season + Hump isn't a particularly good fit alongside Varejao. I don't see where the value is here for Cleveland.

Wild guess here:

Humphries salary is necessary to make the D12 trade work.  However, Orlando has no interest in him.  So, Cleveland is volunteering to take on that salary in return for a draft pick.

The story makes it sound like Cleveland would be giving up a pick, but that makes no sense; they could just sign him outright, I believe, without giving up anything.  It makes a lot more sense, though, if Cleveland is getting a pick to take on a signed-and-traded Humphries (probably on a one year deal, plus two non-guaranteed seasons), especially since Cleveland needs to meet the salary cap floor. 

So, presumably the Nets would give up four 1st rounders in this deal: three to ORL, and one to CLE for taking on Humphries?

Isn't there a rule that you cannot trade away first round picks in consecutive years and you're also not allowed to trade away any picks further than 4 or 5 years in the future?

Because of this, I believe the most of your own first draft picks you're allowed to trade away is 2 or 3.
2020 CelticsStrong All-2000s Draft -- Utah Jazz
 
Finals Starters:  Jason Kidd - Reggie Miller - PJ Tucker - Al Horford - Shaq
Bench:  Rajon Rondo - Trae Young - Marcus Smart - Jaylen Brown -  Peja Stojakovic - Jamal Mashburn - Carlos Boozer - Tristan Thompson - Mehmet Okur

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62992
  • Tommy Points: -25466
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
PF - Kris Humphries, Tristan Thompson
C  - Anderson Varejao, Tyler Zeller

Why would New Jersey want to invest serious funds in Kris Humphries? I don't get it.

It puts him in the way of their top five pick last season + Hump isn't a particularly good fit alongside Varejao. I don't see where the value is here for Cleveland.

Wild guess here:

Humphries salary is necessary to make the D12 trade work.  However, Orlando has no interest in him.  So, Cleveland is volunteering to take on that salary in return for a draft pick.

The story makes it sound like Cleveland would be giving up a pick, but that makes no sense; they could just sign him outright, I believe, without giving up anything.  It makes a lot more sense, though, if Cleveland is getting a pick to take on a signed-and-traded Humphries (probably on a one year deal, plus two non-guaranteed seasons), especially since Cleveland needs to meet the salary cap floor. 

Is Hump a UFA or RFA?  Does it matter?  Doesn't he have to agree to go to Cleveland?  Why would he do that? 

This makes no sense.  NJ has no shot.

Humphries is unrestricted.  He'd agree only if the market for his services was pretty non-existent, and this was his biggest chance at a payday.  He had to take a one year deal last year, as well.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62992
  • Tommy Points: -25466
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Because of this, I believe the most of your own first draft picks you're allowed to trade away is 2 or 3.

You can't trade future picks if it will leave your team without #1s in two consecutive future drafts.  Also, you can't trade more than seven drafts into the future.

Here, the Nets have a future Houston pick, as well.  They could trade: 2013 Nets 1st, 2013 Houston 1st, 2015 Nets 1st, 2017 Nets 1st, 2019 Nets 1st





I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
Quote
Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB

Nets were able to acquire another pick to include in the deal... could be done "as soon as tomorrow"

No clue who Tommy Dee is, but he's been tweeting about this for the last few hours today.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
I'm of the mindset anywhere but the Lakers. Get'r done.

TP & co-sign.
tri-sign.

Can't agree. I hate the Lakers, but the Nets are in our division.

  Yes, keeping Howard in our division to screw the Lakers is a better idea when we aren't a competitive team.

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52967
  • Tommy Points: 2570
Quote
Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB

Nets were able to acquire another pick to include in the deal... could be done "as soon as tomorrow"

No clue who Tommy Dee is, but he's been tweeting about this for the last few hours today.

He is the NYK blog guy, I think. Has had credible information in the past before it became public in the mainstream media (well, if I am thinking of the right chap).

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52967
  • Tommy Points: 2570
The Nets with Dwight Howard would give the East a third legitimate contender to go along with Miami and Boston.

I'd rather see him go to LA.

Offline action781

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 611
Because of this, I believe the most of your own first draft picks you're allowed to trade away is 2 or 3.

You can't trade future picks if it will leave your team without #1s in two consecutive future drafts.  Also, you can't trade more than seven drafts into the future.

Here, the Nets have a future Houston pick, as well.  They could trade: 2013 Nets 1st, 2013 Houston 1st, 2015 Nets 1st, 2017 Nets 1st, 2019 Nets 1st


OK, yeah I had a feeling they must have had another teams's draft pick to use.

Trading away all these picks (esp their 2019 first round pick) would be a potentially very damaging move for the long term future of their franchise.  Trading away so many draft picks for "win now" talent puts franchises in a terrible position once that "win now" window closes.  Joe Johnson (31), Deron Williams (28), and Dwight Howard (26) will all be 38, 35, and 33 years old respectively in the year 2019 and likely to be a pretty bad team.  With no cap space to get good free agents in between now and then and very few first round draft picks in that time either.  They also have no second round draft picks from '13 - '15.  But putting together a title contender like this makes it seem well worth the risk.  I just hope they are ready for a long rebuilding phase after that.

The Spurs and Celtics have done a great job over the past 5 years of balancing reloading while not mortgaging all their future assets.  The Lakers are soon-to-be doomed as well after trading those two picks for Nash and having very few future pieces on board right now.
2020 CelticsStrong All-2000s Draft -- Utah Jazz
 
Finals Starters:  Jason Kidd - Reggie Miller - PJ Tucker - Al Horford - Shaq
Bench:  Rajon Rondo - Trae Young - Marcus Smart - Jaylen Brown -  Peja Stojakovic - Jamal Mashburn - Carlos Boozer - Tristan Thompson - Mehmet Okur

Online BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
The Nets with Dwight Howard would give the East a third legitimate contender to go along with Miami and Boston.

I'd rather see him go to LA.

Same here.

Offline Brendan

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2990
  • Tommy Points: 72
The Nets with Dwight Howard would give the East a third legitimate contender to go along with Miami and Boston.

I'd rather see him go to LA.

Same here.
Agree.

Offline Smokeeye123

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2374
  • Tommy Points: 156
The Nets with Dwight Howard would give the East a third legitimate contender to go along with Miami and Boston.

I'd rather see him go to LA.

Same here.

The lakers would win the finals with a healthy Nash, Howard, Gasol and Kobe. I dont want LA to have 17 banners...ever.

I would rather the heat win the next 5 championships in a row than see LA win one.

Let the Nets have Howard, Johnson is overrated. I think we would be favorites over that team.

Offline lightspeed5

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Tommy Points: 283
The Nets with Dwight Howard would give the East a third legitimate contender to go along with Miami and Boston.

I'd rather see him go to LA.

Same here.

The lakers would win the finals with a healthy Nash, Howard, Gasol and Kobe. I dont want LA to have 17 banners...ever.

I would rather the heat win the next 5 championships in a row than see LA win one.

Let the Nets have Howard, Johnson is overrated. I think we would be favorites over that team.
the lakers cannot have gasol and howard, not just because of salary, but because orlando wouldnt accept just bynum.