Why are people comparing Crawford to Dooling? It's Crawford vs Ray. Ray's > Crawford, but he may be out of here. Crawford's not a great alternative, but we will need a scorer at the SG position, and there's not much to pick from. Better to shoot for Terry, but there's a good chance the MLE won't be enough for either (Crawford opted out at $5 million).
Depends on who is signed & the situation. Ainge has this thing wide open. Dooling is mentioned because if Ray is signed, Crawford would take Dooling's place behind Rondo. Crawford can play both PG or SG. So if Ray is back, or someone like Ross is drafted, Crawford is taking the PG spot behind Rondo.
Rondo/Crawford
Bradley/Ray
Pierce/Pietrus/Daniels
Bass/#21 or #22/JJ
KG/Wilcox/Stiemsma
If Bradley's healthy and Ray re-signs, we don't need a $5million back up point guard. There's better ways to spend the dough, or save it.
That's just it. You have to weigh all the options. As fans, we don't get to see all what's out there & available. Could you sacrifice the Crawford upgrade in Dooling's place for somebody else ? For all we know, signing Dooling might be the better option as we try and address other areas of concern with the money saved by not grabbing Crawford.
Or, could you turn Ray's money into Crawford and Asik ? a 2 for 1 if you will ?
Weighing all the options and figuring out what's best going forward is the toughest part of the job. Luckily Ainge has left himself wide opening for anything to happen.