Author Topic: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?  (Read 14957 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #15 on: June 11, 2012, 11:08:53 PM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
It was terrible trade.

I think trade wasn't financial as many seem to assume. Perk had the misfortune playing alongside Point guard who couldn't score. Floor spacing was an issue then, and it remains an issue now. To circumvent that Ainge coveted shooters to keep floor spaced. The tradeoff was Danny Ainge got the shooters he wanted, but the belly of our defense got softer. Celtics lost their enforcer and a locker-room leader.

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2012, 11:09:33 PM »

Offline JohnBagleyValueMeal

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 813
  • Tommy Points: 176
  • It's not hard to work hard.
Kg was moved to Center. And he always played Center unless Hollins was in for 5 minutes. What you're gonna play Perk 8 mill to be a backup?

Considering we paid 6 mill for JO to not play at all, I think I'd take that deal, sure.

The real killer though, is losing out on Tony Allen for no good reason. Even if you believe he needed a change of scenery to take his game up a notch, the Celts still should have kept him for the player he already was. He has made 2 consecutive All-NBA defensive teams, was just the DPOY, and all he wanted was 3m/3yrs. They paid Chris Wilcox 3m this year!

I dunno if Danny makes the trade for Jeff Green if he would have held on to TA. Interesting question, really.
McHale's favorite ruse is putting paper in the mouths of sleeping teammates. "Try using one of these cocktail napkins," he said. "When just the edge sticks out of a guy's mouth, it looks like he's got fangs. The best part is when he wakes up."
-- Sports Illustrated, 12/19/1983

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #17 on: June 12, 2012, 07:28:26 AM »

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
Perkins isn't as good as he was 2 years ago. He is also overpaid.

Yes the Celtics miss him, but they also missed Posey when he left. And Posey also declined and became overpaid.

Tony Allen was the one that got away.

I'd like to remind everyone that we had the best record in the NBA after the All Star break.  We clearly didn't miss Perkins...we just needed to have a legitimate Center.  And we had (arguably) the best one in the NBA.

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #18 on: June 12, 2012, 07:40:37 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34115
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Perkins isn't as good as he was 2 years ago. He is also overpaid.

Yes the Celtics miss him, but they also missed Posey when he left. And Posey also declined and became overpaid.

Tony Allen was the one that got away.

I'd like to remind everyone that we had the best record in the NBA after the All Star break.  We clearly didn't miss Perkins...we just needed to have a legitimate Center.  And we had (arguably) the best one in the NBA.


The Celtics needed another big man that could enforce the paint for when KG went out.

Would it have been Perkins this season, probably not.


But would the Celtics have gotten more for him to help this season if they had waited and done a sign and trade during the summer, yes. 

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #19 on: June 12, 2012, 08:04:30 AM »

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
Perkins isn't as good as he was 2 years ago. He is also overpaid.

Yes the Celtics miss him, but they also missed Posey when he left. And Posey also declined and became overpaid.

Tony Allen was the one that got away.

I'd like to remind everyone that we had the best record in the NBA after the All Star break.  We clearly didn't miss Perkins...we just needed to have a legitimate Center.  And we had (arguably) the best one in the NBA.


The Celtics needed another big man that could enforce the paint for when KG went out.

Would it have been Perkins this season, probably not.


But would the Celtics have gotten more for him to help this season if they had waited and done a sign and trade during the summer, yes. 

I have mentioned this before...we had a lockout this year.  Danny didn't even know if there was going to be a season.  There were plenty of scenarios where the new CBA wasn't going to even allow for sign-and-trades.  That forced Danny's hand.

I actually think that Danny would have done the sign-and-trade after the 2011 season if we were going into a normal off season (though Perk's production fell off a cliff in 2011, so it wasn't like he was earning his keep.)  There was too much uncertainty about how the new CBA would look, so he did what he could at the time, and I think we made out pretty well.

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #20 on: June 12, 2012, 08:13:51 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34115
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Perkins isn't as good as he was 2 years ago. He is also overpaid.

Yes the Celtics miss him, but they also missed Posey when he left. And Posey also declined and became overpaid.

Tony Allen was the one that got away.

I'd like to remind everyone that we had the best record in the NBA after the All Star break.  We clearly didn't miss Perkins...we just needed to have a legitimate Center.  And we had (arguably) the best one in the NBA.


The Celtics needed another big man that could enforce the paint for when KG went out.

Would it have been Perkins this season, probably not.


But would the Celtics have gotten more for him to help this season if they had waited and done a sign and trade during the summer, yes. 

I have mentioned this before...we had a lockout this year.  Danny didn't even know if there was going to be a season.  There were plenty of scenarios where the new CBA wasn't going to even allow for sign-and-trades.  That forced Danny's hand.

I actually think that Danny would have done the sign-and-trade after the 2011 season if we were going into a normal off season (though Perk's production fell off a cliff in 2011, so it wasn't like he was earning his keep.)  There was too much uncertainty about how the new CBA would look, so he did what he could at the time, and I think we made out pretty well.


The starting C on a Finals team for a pick in the 20s. 


How is that a good return?  How did that help this team in the playoffs this year?

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #21 on: June 12, 2012, 08:17:03 AM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
Nope I say no.

While Perk is having a bit more success, we were good without him. We just ran out of gas.
2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #22 on: June 12, 2012, 08:56:45 AM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
It was terrible trade.

I think trade wasn't financial as many seem to assume. Perk had the misfortune playing alongside Point guard who couldn't score. Floor spacing was an issue then, and it remains an issue now. To circumvent that Ainge coveted shooters to keep floor spaced. The tradeoff was Danny Ainge got the shooters he wanted, but the belly of our defense got softer. Celtics lost their enforcer and a locker-room leader.

  Danny wanted to play Shaq instead of Perk, and the team with Shaq was playing the best offense they'd been playing in quite a while. It wasn't at all because of floor spacing. It had more to do with Daniels getting hurt so we had no backup to PP on the roster.

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #23 on: June 12, 2012, 09:10:09 AM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7483
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
It was terrible trade.

I think trade wasn't financial as many seem to assume. Perk had the misfortune playing alongside Point guard who couldn't score. Floor spacing was an issue then, and it remains an issue now. To circumvent that Ainge coveted shooters to keep floor spaced. The tradeoff was Danny Ainge got the shooters he wanted, but the belly of our defense got softer. Celtics lost their enforcer and a locker-room leader.

This team with Jeff Green and Krstic would have been pretty formidable this year, plus we got a first round pick.
Perkins wouldn't even be around next year because he'd be getting overpriced offers that we'd never pay him anyway.
We made out like bandits if you ask me.
Typical Celtics bad luck struck and we lost Krstic and Green in the same season but we still ended up with the better end of the stick.
OKC will be kicking themselves for paying Perkins so much now.
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #24 on: June 12, 2012, 09:11:21 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34115
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
It was terrible trade.

I think trade wasn't financial as many seem to assume. Perk had the misfortune playing alongside Point guard who couldn't score. Floor spacing was an issue then, and it remains an issue now. To circumvent that Ainge coveted shooters to keep floor spaced. The tradeoff was Danny Ainge got the shooters he wanted, but the belly of our defense got softer. Celtics lost their enforcer and a locker-room leader.

This team with Jeff Green and Krstic would have been pretty formidable this year, plus we got a first round pick.
Perkins wouldn't even be around next year because he'd be getting overpriced offers that we'd never pay him anyway.
We made out like bandits if you ask me.
Typical Celtics bad luck struck and we lost Krstic and Green in the same season but we still ended up with the better end of the stick.
OKC will be kicking themselves for paying Perkins so much now.


Yes.  Do you see how disappointed they are with their team right now?

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #25 on: June 12, 2012, 09:12:09 AM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
Kg was moved to Center. And he always played Center unless Hollins was in for 5 minutes. What you're gonna play Perk 8 mill to be a backup?

No im going to keep the lineup that we never lost a playoff series with the exact same as it was, and still not loose a playoff series with it.

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #26 on: June 12, 2012, 10:12:09 AM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7483
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
It was terrible trade.

I think trade wasn't financial as many seem to assume. Perk had the misfortune playing alongside Point guard who couldn't score. Floor spacing was an issue then, and it remains an issue now. To circumvent that Ainge coveted shooters to keep floor spaced. The tradeoff was Danny Ainge got the shooters he wanted, but the belly of our defense got softer. Celtics lost their enforcer and a locker-room leader.

This team with Jeff Green and Krstic would have been pretty formidable this year, plus we got a first round pick.
Perkins wouldn't even be around next year because he'd be getting overpriced offers that we'd never pay him anyway.
We made out like bandits if you ask me.
Typical Celtics bad luck struck and we lost Krstic and Green in the same season but we still ended up with the better end of the stick.
OKC will be kicking themselves for paying Perkins so much now.


Yes.  Do you see how disappointed they are with their team right now?

Actually although they love their team right now the one problem they have is not having a big man that can score in the paint which is the only thing that can really stop them from beating the Heat, even if they are large favorites. Perkins is a role player being paid 8-9 million next year- this is probably the single biggest issue for OKC fans and their management.
They won't love it when each player asks to get his fair share of pay come contract renewal time. Someone most likely has to go. Who is going out of Perk, Ibaka and Harden?
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #27 on: June 12, 2012, 10:13:09 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34115
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
It was terrible trade.

I think trade wasn't financial as many seem to assume. Perk had the misfortune playing alongside Point guard who couldn't score. Floor spacing was an issue then, and it remains an issue now. To circumvent that Ainge coveted shooters to keep floor spaced. The tradeoff was Danny Ainge got the shooters he wanted, but the belly of our defense got softer. Celtics lost their enforcer and a locker-room leader.

This team with Jeff Green and Krstic would have been pretty formidable this year, plus we got a first round pick.
Perkins wouldn't even be around next year because he'd be getting overpriced offers that we'd never pay him anyway.
We made out like bandits if you ask me.
Typical Celtics bad luck struck and we lost Krstic and Green in the same season but we still ended up with the better end of the stick.
OKC will be kicking themselves for paying Perkins so much now.


Yes.  Do you see how disappointed they are with their team right now?

Actually although they love their team right now the one problem they have is not having a big man that can score in the paint which is the only thing that can really stop them from beating the Heat, even if they are large favorites. Perkins is a role player being paid 8-9 million next year- this is probably the single biggest issue for OKC fans and their management.
They won't love it when each player asks to get his fair share of pay come contract renewal time. Someone most likely has to go. Who is going out of Perk, Ibaka and Harden?


You think they traded and resigned Perkins to get a low post offensive threat?

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #28 on: June 12, 2012, 10:19:11 AM »

Offline Celts Fan 92

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1423
  • Tommy Points: 122
celtics blog still overrating big perk? lol we was 1 game from da finals not a lottery team all i kno is i woulda been heated if Ainge paid him 4 years $36 mil like OKC did

Re: Perk trade still haunting the Celtics?
« Reply #29 on: June 12, 2012, 10:24:31 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34115
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
celtics blog still overrating big perk? lol we was 1 game from da playoffs not a lottery team all i kno is i woulda been heated if Ainge paid him 4 years $36 mil like OKC did


They got that far having nothing on the floor to show from that trade.


Imagine if they actually had something to put on the floor because of that trade that could help them.