Author Topic: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)  (Read 161295 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)
« Reply #390 on: June 12, 2012, 12:38:36 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62439
  • Tommy Points: -25484
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
HAMILTON SHOULD BE A STARTER!

Im considering it

I disagree, I think a healthy Brandon Roy could give more. Better shot creator so he can bail out this team in case someone needs to make a shot (not that this doesnt have a shot creator).

I think his abilities - the ones you listed above - would be better suited for a 6th man role. Elsewise, you're really not coming close to maximizing Tony Parker's skills.

For argument's sake, don't Parker and Ginobili play really well together when they share court time?  Ginobili seems to have similar skills to Roy.

I think I agree with you -- Parker/Hamilton and Roy/Curry are the best balance.  However, I think Roy and Parker would thrive playing with one another, as well.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: 2012 CB Historical Draft: Rosters Thread
« Reply #391 on: June 12, 2012, 12:41:36 PM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
Man, it's going to be tough deciding this year.

Preliminarily, here are my top six (in alphabetical order):

Atlanta Hawks
Dallas Mavericks
Memphis Grizzlies
New York Knicks
Orlando Magic
Philadelphia 76ers

For those who aren't listed, let me know why you're better than at least one of the teams listed, and why I should give your team a second look.

For those who are listed, let me know why you're the best of the best.

The difference between 1st and last is probably the smallest we've seen in one of these drafts.

My team is the best because skill set being relatively similar, my team has a tactical advantage over the competition. We can excel in a fast break offense, as well as the half court. We can play big and we can play small, and the parts still fit well together.

Re: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)
« Reply #392 on: June 12, 2012, 12:43:43 PM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
HAMILTON SHOULD BE A STARTER!

Im considering it

I disagree, I think a healthy Brandon Roy could give more. Better shot creator so he can bail out this team in case someone needs to make a shot (not that this doesnt have a shot creator).

I think his abilities - the ones you listed above - would be better suited for a 6th man role. Elsewise, you're really not coming close to maximizing Tony Parker's skills.

For argument's sake, don't Parker and Ginobili play really well together when they share court time?  Ginobili seems to have similar skills to Roy.

I think I agree with you -- Parker/Hamilton and Roy/Curry are the best balance.  However, I think Roy and Parker would thrive playing with one another, as well.

Maybe it's a product of Nate McMillan's coaching, but Brandon Roy always seemed to me a player who liked a very slow pace and never worked particularly without the ball. Which is kinda why I thought the Andre Miller pairing never really worked well.

Re: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)
« Reply #393 on: June 12, 2012, 12:44:09 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
HAMILTON SHOULD BE A STARTER!

Im considering it

I disagree, I think a healthy Brandon Roy could give more. Better shot creator so he can bail out this team in case someone needs to make a shot (not that this doesnt have a shot creator).

I think his abilities - the ones you listed above - would be better suited for a 6th man role. Elsewise, you're really not coming close to maximizing Tony Parker's skills.

For argument's sake, don't Parker and Ginobili play really well together when they share court time?  Ginobili seems to have similar skills to Roy.
Similar skill set, but Ginobili has shown more willingness to move off the ball and work in a more team based offense.

Re: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)
« Reply #394 on: June 12, 2012, 12:45:00 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
HAMILTON SHOULD BE A STARTER!

Im considering it

I disagree, I think a healthy Brandon Roy could give more. Better shot creator so he can bail out this team in case someone needs to make a shot (not that this doesnt have a shot creator).

I think his abilities - the ones you listed above - would be better suited for a 6th man role. Elsewise, you're really not coming close to maximizing Tony Parker's skills.

For argument's sake, don't Parker and Ginobili play really well together when they share court time?  Ginobili seems to have similar skills to Roy.

I think I agree with you -- Parker/Hamilton and Roy/Curry are the best balance.  However, I think Roy and Parker would thrive playing with one another, as well.

Maybe it's a product of Nate McMillan's coaching, but Brandon Roy always seemed to me a player who liked a very slow pace and never worked particularly without the ball. Which is kinda why I thought the Andre Miller pairing never really worked well.
I'm sure coaching was part of it, but when they tried to run other sets Roy wasn't shy about expressing his displeasure either.

Re: 2012 CB Historical Draft: Rosters Thread
« Reply #395 on: June 12, 2012, 12:46:12 PM »

Offline Rondo2287

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13009
  • Tommy Points: 816
Man, it's going to be tough deciding this year.

Preliminarily, here are my top six (in alphabetical order):

Atlanta Hawks
Dallas Mavericks
Memphis Grizzlies
New York Knicks
Orlando Magic
Philadelphia 76ers

For those who aren't listed, let me know why you're better than at least one of the teams listed, and why I should give your team a second look.

For those who are listed, let me know why you're the best of the best.

The difference between 1st and last is probably the smallest we've seen in one of these drafts.
Let me tell you why Roy.  My team is starting two Finals MVP's and 3 all first team Defenders/two Defensive players of the year. (should be 3 defensive players of the year)

When it gets down to crunch time my roster is full of guys who have been there before and have won it all.  

As we have seen throughout the playoffs over the last few years the best teams are usually the best defensive teams thats because shot making comes and goes but defense is a mindset, and effort and my team has it.  


To close it out, a bet against Tim Duncan is a bet you are probably going to lose.  

CB Draft LA Lakers: Lamarcus Aldridge, Carmelo Anthony,Jrue Holiday, Wes Matthews  6.11, 7.16, 8.14, 8.15, 9.16, 11.5, 11.16

Re: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)
« Reply #396 on: June 12, 2012, 12:46:44 PM »

Offline bdm860

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6133
  • Tommy Points: 4624
Here's my post from the presentation thread:

Presenting the Utah Jazz:

Starters
G – Jason Kidd, 98-99 (All NBA 1st, All Defensive 1st, his highest assist avg of 10.8 )
G – Gary Payton: 95-96 (DPOY, All Defensive 1st, All NBA 2nd)
SF – Chris Mullin, 89-90 (54% FG, 37% 3p, 89% FT, All NBA 3rd)
PF – Blake Griffin: 11-12 (55% FG, All NBA 2nd)
C – Arvydas Sabonis: 95-96 (youngest version of Sabonis, per 36: 22ppg, 12rpg, 2.7apg, 1.3spg, 1.6bpg, 55% FG, 38% 3p, huge production and minute increase in the playoffs).

Bench
6th – Anthony Mason: 96-97 (All Defensive 2nd, All NBA 3rd, 5.7apg)
7th - Brad Miller: 03-04 (All-Star, 4.3apg).
8th - Hersey Hawkins: 90-91 (All-Star, 40% 3p, 87% FT)
9th - Danny Granger: 07-08 (40% 3p)
10th - Brent Barry: 01-02 (50% FG, 42% 3p, 5.3apg)
11th - Nene: 10-11: (62% FG)
12th - Kyrie Irving: 11-12 (40% 3p, 87% FT, ROY)
13th Stacey Augmon: 93-94 (51% FG)

You can check out all their stats here:
First Six
Second Six
13th Man

First things first: the Kidd/Payton backcourt is not a problem at all.
Both grew up together in Oakland, are friends, Kidd has called Payton his mentor.  They were the starting backcourt for both the 1999 USA Team, and the 2000 Olympic team.  They can play well together and have played well together.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL4-mq3Mz8I

Per Larry Brown about playing them together on Team USA:

Quote
Coach Larry Brown didn't waste time placing him in the starting lineup alongside Payton.
"They're not just two great players from Oakland," Brown said. "They're two of the best guards I've ever seen. They complement each other so well. I think it would be a crime in our league if they played together."

Here’s an article that states how great the Payton/Kidd backcourt was working out for Team USA (but you need to pay to see the whole thing), but here's some key quotes from it:
Quote
But the unlikely backcourt duo of Payton and Kidd has set the tone and put these games out of reach practically before they have even started.

"You know, me and J, we grew up together [in Oakland, Calif.]," Payton said. "When we're both on the floor, it's just like . . . we're the same. Jason wants to do more; he wants to be the rebounder, the assist man, and he gets his points when he has to. But right now they have me in a position [off-guard] where they want me to score all the time, and when he or I get the ball, we know to go. And defensively, we're trying to cause havoc. We're trying to get steals, and we're trying to get easy baskets for our teammates. That's what we do."
Quote
Team USA coach Larry Brown has started Payton and Kidd together in the backcourt, which has resulted in a nightmarish experience for opponents. Each player has made his reputation in the NBA with tough defense and a propensity for finding the open man. And while they have been in San Juan, it has been no different.

"When I looked at what would give us the best chance of winning, it was a not a hard decision at all," Brown said. "I had to go with these two guys in the backcourt. They do so many things well, and they're sort of interchangeable. Their defense is so amazing, and they just cause all kind of problems for the opposition."
Quote
"Those guys are so fast, so good, so athletic and so skilled that it makes it hard for anyone [on the other team] to do their job," Nash said. "You're talking about two of the best at their position in the world. And when you go against both of them at the same time, it can be overwhelming."
Quote
"To say it's not special to play with a guy you grew up with would be lying," Payton said. "This has been fun for the both of us. Playing in games like these are the kind you grow up talking about. It makes it even better when you can look over to see someone you've known since you both were kids."

Payton and Kidd were the captains for those USA teams, just like they’ll be co-captains for my team.

Also Kidd started alongside Kevin Johnson, and also shared the court with Steve Nash in Phoenix.  Gary Payton started alongside Sam Cassell with the Bucks.  Kidd and Payton have played well with other point guards before, and played great together with Team USA.

Bottom line is, the Kidd/Payton backcourt works.

And with a Run-TMC version of Chris Mullin, along with Blake Griffin, I got a team that can really get out and run.

Next issue, Sabonis past his prime.  I'm taking the youngest version, so the most healthy and athletic version of Sabonis available.  Look at his per 36 numbers, and look at his playoff numbers.  Also in this league I don't need to play Sabonis more than the 30mpg anyway (he'll likely settle in around 25mpg).  He will split time at Center with Brad Miller.  Both started and came off the bench for their teams in the years I chose, both are great passing big men, great ball handlers, and both could shoot the 3p.  While the rest of my team runs, they can come down and play the high post - Centers that can shoot the 3p, pass, handle the ball, and play up top are perfect for this kind of team.  Your bigs gotta come out and guard them.  Which will really open things up for my team with their passing.

My 6th man is Anthony Mason, another great ball handler and passer for his position, and will back up both the 3 and 4.

Rotation and minutes will look this:

PG: Kidd (35), Payton (13), Irving, Barry
SG: Payton (22), Hawkins (20), Barry (6), Augmon
SF: Mullin (30), Mason (6 ), Granger (12), Augmon
PF: Griffin (30), Mason (16), Granger (2), Nene
C: Sabonis (24), Miller (22), Griffin (2), Nene

And this is who gets the shots (based out of 100%)
Kidd: 12%
Payton: 14%
Mullin: 16%
Grffin: 16%
Sabonis: 9%
Mason: 8%
Miller: 8%
Hawkins: 8%
Granger: 6%
Barry: 2%
Irving, Nene, Augmon: 1%



Kidd and Payton are great defenders, Barry, Hawkins, Mason, Granger, and Augmon are good defenders.  All but 2 players on my team averaged a steal or more per game, and those that didn't averaged 0.8 and 0.9.

Kidd, Payton, Mullin, Sabonis, Miller, Hawkins, Barry, Granger, and Irving all have to be guarded out to the 3pt line.  4 guys shot 40% or better from 3, two others shot 38%, and another shot 37%, and that doesn't include Payton or Miller who have to be respected.

All my guys are unselfish players, and probably everybody except for Griffin, Nene, and Augmon (two of whom are at the end of my bench) are great or at least above average passers and ball handlers for their position.  The only person who averaged less than 2apg is Sabonis, and we know he's a great passer and that was only because he was playing 24mpg.


We got shooting, passing, defense, ball handling, and unselfishness.  Looking at combined stats, my team shoots 51% from the field, 38% from 3, and 78% from the line, with a 1.8 assist-to-turnover ratio (all would be in the running for league leaders any given year).

And all my guys have played great with other superstars (Payton and Hawkins in Seattle, then Payton again in LA and Miami, Barry in San Antonio, Sabonis in Portland, Mason in New York and Miami, Mullin with Run TMC, Granger on a balanced Indiana team, Kidd/Payton/Mullin in the Olympics.  I think some teams have too many alpha dogs who need the ball and a lot of shots to be effective, I don't have that problem here.

And I feel I have a few different styles I could play too in addition to my regular starting lineup:
I can go small and fast with Blake Griffin at Center and Anthony Mason/Danny Granger at PF, or I can go big with Anthony Mason at SF, and even play Brad Miller at PF next to Sabonis at C for short periods of time.

End of bench:
I have a young stud in Irving, who granted won’t see much time, but being his first year out of college, and playing behind and learning from Payton and Kidd will suit this youngster just fine.  Hey it worked for Steve Nash playing behind Kevin Johnson and Kidd.  Nene is my 3rd (or even 4th) string big, backing up both the PF and C spots.  He’ll provide good hustle, rebounding, defense, and scoring, and won’t miss too many shots.  And Stacey Augmon is a very good athlete and defender (they didn’t call him the Plastic Man for nothing).  If we had a player like Wade, Kobe, or LeBron killing us, maybe he’d get a chance to lock them down.  If he did get to play, he’d thrive getting out on the break with Payton and Kidd.


You know other teams will have problems with who gets the shots and minutes (or not getting enough shots and minutes) and if certain players can co-exist together.  I don't think that's a problem at all on my team.  We can space the floor, pass, run, defend, and shoot.

After 18 months with their Bigs, the Littles were: 46% less likely to use illegal drugs, 27% less likely to use alcohol, 52% less likely to skip school, 37% less likely to skip a class

Re: 2012 CB Historical Draft: Rosters Thread
« Reply #397 on: June 12, 2012, 12:50:42 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62439
  • Tommy Points: -25484
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Man, it's going to be tough deciding this year.

Preliminarily, here are my top six (in alphabetical order):

Atlanta Hawks
Dallas Mavericks
Memphis Grizzlies
New York Knicks
Orlando Magic
Philadelphia 76ers

For those who aren't listed, let me know why you're better than at least one of the teams listed, and why I should give your team a second look.

For those who are listed, let me know why you're the best of the best.

The difference between 1st and last is probably the smallest we've seen in one of these drafts.
Let me tell you why Roy.  My team is starting two Finals MVP's and 3 all first team Defenders/two Defensive players of the year. (should be 3 defensive players of the year)

When it gets down to crunch time my roster is full of guys who have been there before and have won it all.  

As we have seen throughout the playoffs over the last few years the best teams are usually the best defensive teams thats because shot making comes and goes but defense is a mindset, and effort and my team has it.  


To close it out, a bet against Tim Duncan is a bet you are probably going to lose.  



What's you rough minutes breakdown in the front court?


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)
« Reply #398 on: June 12, 2012, 12:52:04 PM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
I would start Larry Johnson or Amare.  Actually, with the SF you have, I would start Larry Johnson at SF (where he played after his injury for NY)


AK and Oakley make better fits around AI.

Thanks, W ... I'll talk to management and see what we can do. I had considered Johnson at starting SF, but liked the chemistry between AK and Kenny. I also like starting Oakley with Deke, (tough frontcourt), but we're flexible ... see what others think, too. ;)
Once you took Iverson and Amare out, you lost a ton of scoring, which will be rough for you.  You need a go to scorer somewhere in your starting lineup. 

Honestly you might be better served moving Iverson back into your starting lineup but with the AK, Oakley, and Deke front line.  Which makes your starting unit a pretty strong defensive unit (iverson can gamble with his steals and still be bailed out) and your second five a high octane kind of offense with Anderson, Martin, Johnson, Amare, and Hibbert.  You could even go small and swap out Hibbert for Harper. 

That said, I think your first unit does work with Anderson instead of Iverson, but I just think it would really struggle to create offense and that would be my hesitation.
Yeah, scoring is the biggest compromise when moving AI to the bench, obviously, but we feel Kenny is more the type of leader and balanced floor general we need running the team ... besides, AI will still get decent minutes, but in a more defense-oriented lineup.
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: 2012 CB Historical Draft: Rosters Thread
« Reply #399 on: June 12, 2012, 01:01:49 PM »

Offline Rondo2287

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13009
  • Tommy Points: 816
Man, it's going to be tough deciding this year.

Preliminarily, here are my top six (in alphabetical order):

Atlanta Hawks
Dallas Mavericks
Memphis Grizzlies
New York Knicks
Orlando Magic
Philadelphia 76ers

For those who aren't listed, let me know why you're better than at least one of the teams listed, and why I should give your team a second look.

For those who are listed, let me know why you're the best of the best.

The difference between 1st and last is probably the smallest we've seen in one of these drafts.
Let me tell you why Roy.  My team is starting two Finals MVP's and 3 all first team Defenders/two Defensive players of the year. (should be 3 defensive players of the year)

When it gets down to crunch time my roster is full of guys who have been there before and have won it all.  

As we have seen throughout the playoffs over the last few years the best teams are usually the best defensive teams thats because shot making comes and goes but defense is a mindset, and effort and my team has it.  


To close it out, a bet against Tim Duncan is a bet you are probably going to lose.  



What's you rough minutes breakdown in the front court?


Here is my minutes breakdown

Duncan (36) / Gortat (10)/Okafor (2)
Wallace (25) / Boozer(23)/Okafor (matchup dependent)
Artest  (32)/ Schrempf (16)/ Miller
Rip     (22)/ Roy (26)/ Miller
Parker (35)/ Curry (13)/ Livingston

Okafor will see some minutes depending on matchups whether or not he would be a better matchup than gortat for some opposing centers.

Miller will probably see most of his time in garbage time / foul trouble /  or last second need a shot get all your shooters on the floor scenarios

I think I will move Rip to the starting lineup but Roy will see more minutes as 6th man

Then Livingston will probably only see selective minutes.
CB Draft LA Lakers: Lamarcus Aldridge, Carmelo Anthony,Jrue Holiday, Wes Matthews  6.11, 7.16, 8.14, 8.15, 9.16, 11.5, 11.16

Re: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)
« Reply #400 on: June 12, 2012, 01:05:02 PM »

Offline Rondo2287

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13009
  • Tommy Points: 816
Also who knows, you may even see a couple of twin tower lineups with Gortat and Duncan, the Gortat and Howard lineups were always fun to watch.
CB Draft LA Lakers: Lamarcus Aldridge, Carmelo Anthony,Jrue Holiday, Wes Matthews  6.11, 7.16, 8.14, 8.15, 9.16, 11.5, 11.16

Re: 2012 CB Historical Draft: Rosters Thread
« Reply #401 on: June 12, 2012, 01:06:51 PM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
Man, it's going to be tough deciding this year.

Preliminarily, here are my top six (in alphabetical order):

Atlanta Hawks
Dallas Mavericks
Memphis Grizzlies
New York Knicks
Orlando Magic
Philadelphia 76ers

For those who aren't listed, let me know why you're better than at least one of the teams listed, and why I should give your team a second look.

For those who are listed, let me know why you're the best of the best.

The difference between 1st and last is probably the smallest we've seen in one of these drafts.

My team is the best because skill set being relatively similar, my team has a tactical advantage over the competition. We can excel in a fast break offense, as well as the half court. We can play big and we can play small, and the parts still fit well together.

Will the Nuggets crack the top 6 if a younger, still mobile Ewing starts at PF and Smits at C?
2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace

Re: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)
« Reply #402 on: June 12, 2012, 01:48:55 PM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
Here's my view of the five teams that have done presentations thus far:

1. Magic
2. Mavericks
----------- (gap)
3. Spurs
----------- (gap)
4. Diablos
5. Nuggets


Here's my thinking:  The Magic and Mavericks are clearly the two best teams who have posted so far, in my humble opinion.  All of the teams for far have some major strengths, and a few weaknesses.

Orlando:  I hate Starbury on this team.  I think he has the potential to disrupt the locker room.  That said, the Magic can always cut him, and the only harm is a wasted draft pick.  This is probably the best passing team in the league, and I love that they can outscore anybody or play some excellent defense.  Weaknesses:  Not great defensively up front, overall weakness at the PG position.

Dallas:  The most talented team so far, maybe.  This team can score and shoot with the best of them.  It's hard to overestimate how good of a player Karl Malone was in his prime, and he's going to punish teams.  Weaknesses:  This is a "fit" problem to me a bit.  Lots and lots of ultra-talented guys, but also a lot of "me first" dudes in my opinion.  Bynum, young Pierce, Westbrook, Bibby, Stackhouse, Cousins, etc. ...  There's a criticism that those guys are out to "get theirs".  Also, I don't like the strategy of building a team to score 120+ points per night.  Teams like that run into the right defensive squad and they're in trouble.

San Antonio:  Another extremely talented team.  It would be great to see teams try to score on a JO / Smith / Battier / Pippen / Armstrong lineup.  Ilyasova and Person weren't my favorite picks, but otherwise this team has a strong bench that fits well.  Weaknesses:  I don't know what it is, but I don't like that Finley / Nash backcourt.  I guess it's because we've seen it before on the "real" Dallas Mavericks, and it didn't work at all defensively.  It was just bad.  Also, I don't love the fit of JO and Brand next to each other.  I really wish the Spurs had landed a dominant center to play next to JO; that would have been something.

Downeast:  I love Dikembe as a backstop and Kirilenko as a roaming defender.  Iverson can pressure the passing lanes that way, making this team opportunistic on defense.  I love Charles Oakley; he's one of my favorite role players ever.  Weakness:  Iverson.  I don't like Iverson as a starter in this format; I think it leads to getting less out of the surrounding teammates than you'd like in this format.  I could buy Iverson in one of these leagues if he was a sixth man surrounded by defensive role players.  Here, though, he's playing next to Mitch Richmond and Amare Stoudemire, two players who need a ton of touches and who don't play much defense.  We saw this year how ineffective Amare can be playing next to a lane-clogging center and a high-usage scorer.  I think that would be even worse on the Diablos (and I am a big Amare fan).  I thought the Klay Thompsen pick was a wasted one (binkie alert?), and I hate the idea of a poor defender like Kevin Martin playing out of position at SF.

Nuggets:  It's probably unfair to put this team in last (of these five particular teams).  Ewing was an absolutely amazing player, and I'm a Penny fan.  Grant Hill was other-wordly back in the day (I mean, 21/9/7 with 2 steals for a full season?!?)  Weaknesses:  I just can't rate a team with P.J. Brown and Doug Christie in the starting lineup that highly.  Role players are nice, but when you've got two players so far below the league-average in your starting lineup, it makes things a huge up hill struggle.  I don't love many of the bench players, either (although I do like Prince a lot.)

All of the above are excellent teams, but in my subjective opinion, I like some better than others.
Just wondering what you thought of my adjustments to the rotation and minutes ... I think this team has a lot more dimensions to it than than just AI's attitude problems, and I think the good standards set by the hard-workers on this team couldn't help but have a positive affect.

I knew AI was the kiss of death when I picked him, but I guess I'm a hard case for second-and-thrid chances, (maybe because I've been given plenty myself). Oh, and you were right about Thompson ... that was my one purely selfish pick, and our "Rookie In Training", (which any good self-respecting mentoring franchise should have ... good things coming from that kid, guaranteed).
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)
« Reply #403 on: June 12, 2012, 02:03:59 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62439
  • Tommy Points: -25484
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Quote
Just wondering what you thought of my adjustments to the rotation and minutes ... I think this team has a lot more dimensions to it than than just AI's attitude problems, and I think the good standards set by the hard-workers on this team couldn't help but have a positive affect.

I think if I were coaching your team, I'd go with the following:

Dikembe
Kirilenko
Johnson
Richmond
Iverson

... with AK47 and Johnson being interchangeable, based upon matchup.

Then, I'd go with a bench of:

Amare
Oakley
Harper
Martin
Anderson

Now, this isn't ideal, but I love the idea of a second unit that pushes the pace and that can outscore most other teams.  Oakley keeps teams honest, and he's a good fit with Amare.  I left Hibbert on the bench, because Amare just has a lot more mobility, and allows you to change the identity of your team.

The first unit can still flourish with Dikembe and AK47 giving teams fits on defense, while allowing AI to take over offensively while still surrounding him with good shooters. 


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: How's my Historical Team? (Awesome right!)
« Reply #404 on: June 12, 2012, 02:28:27 PM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
I put my ballot in.

BEST DEFENSE

1. New York Knicks
2. LA Clippers
3. Miami Heat


Was really debating between Heat and the Pacers for that third spot. Ultimately, I decided that while I like the Pacers' speed a ton, I had some concerns about them taking on size.


BEST OFFENSE

1. Orlando Magic
2. Atlanta Hawks
3. Boston Celtics

 

BEST OVERALL

1. Orlando Magic
2. Atlanta Hawks
3. Miami Heat


Sorry to Greenfaith, who I had ranked 4th in offense and overall, and 5th defense.