82
82
82
82
79
82
78
54/56
I could go on about this all morning but that's probably enough. Even if it wasn't painfully obvious that Dwight is the better player, for those reasons alone he should be given the advantage.
So Dwight Howard can jump and is tall. He is also strong.
He can't shoot.
He has no post moves.
If he were 6 feet 9 he would be a poor mans Josh Smith.
He played a lot of games.
He is a complete disappointment in his offensive development at this point in his career.
Once his jumping is gone he will be about as useful as Brian Scalabrine.
Playing 82 games over 54 does not make you a better basketball player. It means you haven't had bad injury luck. If Howard injures one knee and his mobility is limited to that of Andrew Bynum, what can he bring to a team that Kendrick Perkins can't?
In fact, is it safe to say that Dwight Howard is a giant disappointment given his size and athleticism?
On that Orlando team why wouldn't Bynum be averaging 25ppg and 12-14 rebounds per game.
You can foul Howard with 2 minutes left because he's gonna miss those free throws. Bynum is going to hit 20% more free throws.
I want to hear how Howard is the clear cut winner in this argument. If Bynum plays like this for the next 3 years how is this even a conversation?
If I was 7'2, I could be in the NBA.
But since I am 5'8, I am not.
Howard is a 7 footer. So is Bynum. If both were shorter, they wouldn't be as good.
You can say that about every player in the NBA. If Muggsy Bogues was shorter then 5'3, he wouldn't have been as good.
Howard is the better player then Bynum.
Actually, Bynum is the more complete basketball player by far.
He has more skill, more moves, a higher basketball IQ, he's a better free throw shooter.
Howard is a defensive center. Bynum is a complete center. He can score through multiple avenues, even with another elite 7 footer in the paint with him, and he is an excellent defender.
The only reason this is a conversation is because of Bynum's injury problems-which granted, do effect this discussion but he has proven this year that he is by far a superior player.
Have you watched most Lakers and Magic games this year?
Did you see Bynum vs the Clippers the other night? He does things that Howard wouldn't dream of doing.
Dwight Howard being voted as the 2nd best player in the NBA is a joke, just as Chris Paul being in the top 5 is a joke.
He is one of the best defenders of course, but for me it boils down to this:
You can't go to Howard in the clutch time because he has no post moves and he can't shoot free throws.
He plays great defense and is great finishing around the rim, but he cannot create his own shot and finish like Bynum, nor can he be the 'go to' guy at the end of the game.
That's where the argument ends in my opinion.
You're down by 2 points with 15 seconds remaining in game 7 of the finals. Who's hands do you want the ball in? Honestly?