I was dying for a retort by now, but you guys have got me fired up enough where I don't care and I'm just going to rant:
I don't understand WHY - in sports in particular - when someone provides a unique perspective that they're put under so much scrutiny.
There are, what, TWENTY SEVEN head coaches in the league that haven't coached their teams to a championship yet; most of which haven't and quite frankly probably won't even begin to sniff the type of success Mike D'Antoni has in his coaching career.
He coaches his teams to have a strategical advantage over his opponents and when he's got the parts it turns into a success. Turned Nash into an MVP, multiple Western Conference appearances. But because he hasn't cleared that final hurdle, something FEW have been able to do he's and he's absolute failure?!
It's not 'the team needed just one extra player' or 'his teams ran into some great teams' or 'if his player didn't get suspended in a playoff game he'd be a champion, and forever remembered as a great' (because surely coaching legacies haven't been built off of isolated championships around here). No. The guys is a failure, his system is stupid, and it couldn't possibly work.