Trade:
Knicks Trade: Lee, 6.14, 8.20
Hornets trade: Rush, 6.3, 7.3
Man, that's just a bad trade. New Orleans gave up the best player in the deal, and the two best picks.
I disagree. Rush is relying on a statistical anomaly to have his first decent year. He's been a useful player in GS, but I value Lee's consistency.
I'm very puzzled by this explanation. Last year, Rush outscored Lee, as well, and shot a higher 3PT% than him. Rush's career low is 37.3% 3PT shooting, and he's been over 41% the last three years.
They're similar enough players, but Rush is the one who is having the better year this year, had the better year last year, and has more upside going forward.
I don't think its far to label the trade like you did for Atzar. Lee's a proven commodity, whereas Rush is much more inconsistent, higher upside.
How is the guy who consistently shoots better, and who has had the better year the last two seasons, the inconsistent one? Courtney Lee has coasted on his rookie reputation from Orlando for a couple of seasons now. Rush is currently the better player, and has been for quite some time.
It was a very good trade for New York, and a very bad one for New Orleans. Yes, I think it's fair to label it that way. This isn't competitive, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I'm very surprised to see anybody who thinks that Courtney Lee is significantly better than Brandon Rush.