Author Topic: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO  (Read 7394 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« on: December 29, 2011, 09:31:22 AM »

Offline ugh

  • Xavier Tillman Sr.
  • Posts: 29
  • Tommy Points: 3
There were talks about using the amnesty clause on J Oneil before the season started and was wondering if they still can.  Pryzbilla and another center are out there waiting and they could use that money to sign one or both.

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2011, 09:38:18 AM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Pryzbilla and another center are out there waiting and they could use that money to sign one or both.
No, they actually couldn't.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2011, 09:41:28 AM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32935
  • Tommy Points: 846
  • Larry Bird for President
JO is flat out awful.

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2011, 09:48:34 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7691
  • Tommy Points: 447
We already have $9mil from Green's voided contract, right?  As bad as JO has been, I'd still try to keep him as a backup since we are so short on centers.  But I'm jealous of the teams with centers who don't mind contact and rebound and finish.

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #4 on: December 29, 2011, 09:52:03 AM »

Offline CFAN38

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4965
  • Tommy Points: 433
using the amnesty doesn't do the team any good in terms of cap space. Much the same way we didn't gain cap space when we voided jeff greens contract. The best we can do with JO contract is trade it, as it is an expiring deal and holds some value.
Mavs
Wiz
Hornet

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2011, 09:55:04 AM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
We already have $9mil from Green's voided contract, right?  As bad as JO has been, I'd still try to keep him as a backup since we are so short on centers.  But I'm jealous of the teams with centers who don't mind contact and rebound and finish.
We do, if you imply that our payroll is $9 million less. The voided contract does not create an exception (and I also believe there's some sort of a cap hold, since we haven't renounced Green's rights).

Likewise, just waiving O'Neal will not have any implications about our ability to sign anyone for more than the veteran minimum, since we'll still be over the cap.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2011, 10:18:18 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
JO has 9 rebounds in 3 games   :'(

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #7 on: December 29, 2011, 10:19:20 AM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21271
  • Tommy Points: 2452
   
Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO...

or KG? ;)
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #8 on: December 29, 2011, 10:21:07 AM »

Offline snively

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6011
  • Tommy Points: 503
Would do us no good.

Amnesty more useful for sweeping Paul off the cap when the time comes.
2025 Draft: Chicago Bulls

PG: Chauncey Billups/Deron Williams
SG: Kobe Bryant/Eric Gordon
SF: Jimmy Butler/Danny Granger/Danilo Gallinari
PF: Al Horford/Zion Williamson
C: Yao Ming/Pau Gasol/Tyson Chandler

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #9 on: December 29, 2011, 10:23:00 AM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
What do you guys want him to do?  He's getting the Mikki Moore treatment right now.
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #10 on: December 29, 2011, 10:23:52 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
What do you guys want him to do?  He's getting the Mikki Moore treatment right now.

?

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #11 on: December 29, 2011, 11:09:13 AM »

Offline Q_FBE

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2317
  • Tommy Points: 243
It is not too late but this is the wrong answer since he is an expiring contract. Those are like gold in a midseason trade market. We can use his expiring contract in a potential franchise changing trade. BTW we can use Ray Allen and KG expiring contracts if Paul Pierce keeps having injury troubles and the Celtics continue to struggle to terminate the PGA Era of 2008 to 2011.

I am not advocating this approach even after last night's Poor Energy court appearence in New Orleans. I refuse to devolve into Gang Green messageboard style of debunking the local team (In the J E T S S U C K S U C K S U C K sense). 
The beatings will continue until morale improves

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #12 on: December 29, 2011, 11:14:46 AM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
Waiving him will do no good. Trading him because he's an expiring might be the best bet to get rid of him if it's needed.

Do we still have the Clips 1st rounder? If so they can package JO's expiring and that for somebody, anybody.

After what he looked like in the NO game, im flat out giving up after days of defending him. He really looks like done or just a backup.

Trade him to Washington for Blatche. The guy's a headcase over there and looks to be like is close to be out of town. WIth the veterans around him though, that head could be straighten up. He's a better bet than JO is right now.
2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #13 on: December 29, 2011, 11:16:52 AM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
What do you guys want him to do?  He's getting the Mikki Moore treatment right now.

?
Do you not watch the games?  Since the end of last year he's been getting the most phantom fouls.  How is he supposed to be aggressive on D or get into any kind of rhythm when he always has to sit down?

Regardless he still provides average to above average defense.  That's all he needs to do, not score on offense.  If he wants to take open 12 footers, that's fine because he'll start making them.  How the heck is he worth amnestying?
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale

Re: Is it too late to use the Amnesty Clause on JO
« Reply #14 on: December 29, 2011, 11:22:42 AM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
What do you guys want him to do?  He's getting the Mikki Moore treatment right now.

?
Do you not watch the games?  Since the end of last year he's been getting the most phantom fouls.  How is he supposed to be aggressive on D or get into any kind of rhythm when he always has to sit down?

Regardless he still provides average to above average defense.  That's all he needs to do, not score on offense.  If he wants to take open 12 footers, that's fine because he'll start making them.  How the heck is he worth amnestying?

Exactly.  Terrible, terrible calls.

I have full faith that he'll be fine.  He looked great last year when he played on defense, and he wasn't healthy. 

He is now.  He'll come around. 

And amnestying wouldn't work anyway, as others have pointed out.