Author Topic: Celtics still better than Knicks?  (Read 8038 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Celtics still better than Knicks?
« on: December 17, 2011, 10:41:43 PM »

Offline ktw7

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 26
  • Tommy Points: 2
The Knicks now have the advantage in the starting frontcourt. But the Celtics backcourt of Rondo and Ray still dominates whatever combo the Knicks throw out there.

I know the Celtics bench is sort of weak but I feel like even with no Jeff Green our depth is a little better than the Knicks who have a weak  bench.

I feel like if the C's stay healthier than Knicks, we should get the #3 seed. Our team is old but Stoudemire and Chandler have injury history as well and Bibby is old. Thoughts? Who is better right now?

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2011, 11:04:35 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
in a condensed 66 game season i have a feeling the knicks will have a better record.  they have more impact young guys and their 3 best players are in their prime (under 31).  i think a condensed season tends to favor teams with multiple potent scoring options, and that means the knicks have an advantage.  it's harder to play good team basketball and find guys who are open when everybody is tired.  conversely, easier to take advantage of tired defenders if you have really good one-on-one scorers.  amare / melo will win quite a few games by themselves (same applies to LeBron / Wade).

in the playoffs, im not so sure who will be better.  health may determine that question more than relative talent on either roster, though.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2011, 11:23:41 PM »

Offline j804

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9348
  • Tommy Points: 3072
  • BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS
in a condensed 66 game season i have a feeling the knicks will have a better record.  they have more impact young guys and their 3 best players are in their prime (under 31).  i think a condensed season tends to favor teams with multiple potent scoring options, and that means the knicks have an advantage.  it's harder to play good team basketball and find guys who are open when everybody is tired.  conversely, easier to take advantage of tired defenders if you have really good one-on-one scorers.  amare / melo will win quite a few games by themselves (same applies to LeBron / Wade).

in the playoffs, im not so sure who will be better.  health may determine that question more than relative talent on either roster, though.
Yup it's barely sinking in on me how bad the schedules are its going to suck for veteran teams. I don't think there is much rest either between the season and playoffs. Then in the early rounds back to backs.
"7ft PG. Rondo leaves and GUESS WHAT? We got a BIGGER point guard!"-Tommy on Olynyk


Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2011, 11:35:16 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
I disagree that the Knicks will be better than the C's or that they even have three young offensive options. Chandler is a lot of things but unless a good PG is getting him easy looks right under the basket, his offense is fairly limited. Heck, I saw an article that said their sixth man is injured. That sixth man's name: Bill Walker.

Bill Walker is their sixth man??

Nuf said.

Amar'e and Melo couldn't go far last year with a better bench and Chauncey at PG on the outside. This year they have no PG and Walker is their sixth man? Chandler is a great defensive center but with a coach that doesn't stress defense and who runs an offensive system predicated on having a very good passing PG that can shoot from the outside, I don't see NY being any better than last year.

They took a sideways move this year to add a prime PG next year and make their real run then.

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2011, 12:03:19 AM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53066
  • Tommy Points: 2574
They took a sideways move this year to add a prime PG next year and make their real run then.
There seems to be a group of Knicks who are expecting Steve Nash to come to New York and re-unite with Mike D'Antoni on a bargain contract next summer after his present deal expires.

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2011, 12:07:42 AM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11472
  • Tommy Points: 5352
  • Thumper of the BASS!
reading the new york post today melo claims they gon win it all

all that talent in ny kinda hard to argue any thing different

unless u a C's fan cuz we runnin thangs for sho in  the east..

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2011, 12:12:55 AM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53066
  • Tommy Points: 2574
Poor guard play and no depth = not a title threat (yet)

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2011, 12:24:42 AM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
Poor guard play and no depth = not a title threat (yet)

not a title threat, no, but better in the regular season?  i think so.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2011, 01:03:57 AM »

Offline Lord of Mikawa

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 883
  • Tommy Points: 66
  • Anti-Lakers&Anti-Heat
They took a sideways move this year to add a prime PG next year and make their real run then.
There seems to be a group of Knicks who are expecting Steve Nash to come to New York and re-unite with Mike D'Antoni on a bargain contract next summer after his present deal expires.
That would be interesting to say the least. But I do think the Knicks will win the division this year.
Signed to a 6 year $0 contract with the Celtics Blog forum!

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2011, 01:26:42 AM »

Offline Celticjay

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 210
  • Tommy Points: 19
Depends on who the Knicks pick up with their midlevel.  Also, if they get Baron davis we could be in big trouble.   In the end though I think Amare's health is a big concern and they also won't be as well coached as the Celtics I think we have a slight edge, but Chandler certainly does make their frontline imposing..

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #10 on: December 18, 2011, 03:13:23 PM »

Offline smw6230

  • Drew Peterson
  • Posts: 2
  • Tommy Points: 0
There seems to be a group of Knicks who are expecting Steve Nash to come to New York and re-unite with Mike D'Antoni on a bargain contract next summer after his present deal expires.

Never saw any sense in NY or anyone waiting on a 40 year old PG to help you win it, not when your core guys are in their mid to late 20s.

Moot point though as ESPN just went live with a story about NY agreeing to terms with Baron Davis.

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nba/story/_/id/7365817/baron-davis-new-york-knicks-agree-deal-sources-say

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #11 on: December 18, 2011, 03:51:26 PM »

Offline cman88

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5530
  • Tommy Points: 397
will the knicks commit to playing defense? im not really scared of them until they do

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #12 on: December 18, 2011, 04:04:11 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Barron is nowhere near the player he was, but I think this signing definitely will give the Knicks the atlantic division championship.

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #13 on: December 18, 2011, 04:09:06 PM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
Yep..still better than the Knicks, even with the addition of BDavis.

He will help them, but they need a bit more.

IMO, they would've been better off convincing Chauncey to come back.

Re: Celtics still better than Knicks?
« Reply #14 on: December 18, 2011, 04:11:06 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
Yep..still better than the Knicks, even with the addition of BDavis.

He will help them, but they need a bit more.

IMO, they would've been better off convincing Chauncey to come back.

chauncey could not have come back.  you aren't allowed to re-sign an amnestied player within the same season.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers