0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
I wonder if that New York rumour from the other day comes alive.Knicks to offer Amare for CP3 ??
Quote from: Who on December 11, 2011, 12:36:13 AMI wonder if that New York rumour from the other day comes alive.Knicks to offer Amare for CP3 ??this could be a real possibility.paul, anthony, and chandler.....yikes!
Quote from: KGs Knee on December 11, 2011, 12:38:00 AMQuote from: Who on December 11, 2011, 12:36:13 AMI wonder if that New York rumour from the other day comes alive.Knicks to offer Amare for CP3 ??this could be a real possibility.paul, anthony, and chandler.....yikes!and you know what i just realized. these are their last names, while they are normally first namesif there is one thing i learned, never trust a man with two first names
Quote from: prov1ml34 on December 11, 2011, 12:29:40 AMQuote from: Mencius on December 11, 2011, 12:26:30 AMQuote from: Chris on December 11, 2011, 12:18:56 AMJust to throw it out there, Rondo/Bradley/JO/Vet minimum should be enough to take back Paul and West. CP's 16+M and West's proposed 9M per is 25M.We no longer can trade Green now that he's signed, and Rondo/Bradley/JO/Vet won't be enough to snag them both, unfortunately. Plus, that's a craap package compared to what the league just said was insufficient.Yes but it might be the best deal available to the NOH. The NBA really can't let Paul walk at the end of the year and get nothing so they better take the best available offer. Im pretty sure the Celtics can still trade Jeff Green since he is on a one year deal. He would have to consent and lose his Bird rights.
Quote from: Mencius on December 11, 2011, 12:26:30 AMQuote from: Chris on December 11, 2011, 12:18:56 AMJust to throw it out there, Rondo/Bradley/JO/Vet minimum should be enough to take back Paul and West. CP's 16+M and West's proposed 9M per is 25M.We no longer can trade Green now that he's signed, and Rondo/Bradley/JO/Vet won't be enough to snag them both, unfortunately. Plus, that's a craap package compared to what the league just said was insufficient.Yes but it might be the best deal available to the NOH. The NBA really can't let Paul walk at the end of the year and get nothing so they better take the best available offer.
Quote from: Chris on December 11, 2011, 12:18:56 AMJust to throw it out there, Rondo/Bradley/JO/Vet minimum should be enough to take back Paul and West. CP's 16+M and West's proposed 9M per is 25M.We no longer can trade Green now that he's signed, and Rondo/Bradley/JO/Vet won't be enough to snag them both, unfortunately. Plus, that's a craap package compared to what the league just said was insufficient.
Just to throw it out there, Rondo/Bradley/JO/Vet minimum should be enough to take back Paul and West.
Quote from: mloyko on December 11, 2011, 12:35:01 AMQuote from: prov1ml34 on December 11, 2011, 12:29:40 AMQuote from: Mencius on December 11, 2011, 12:26:30 AMQuote from: Chris on December 11, 2011, 12:18:56 AMJust to throw it out there, Rondo/Bradley/JO/Vet minimum should be enough to take back Paul and West. CP's 16+M and West's proposed 9M per is 25M.We no longer can trade Green now that he's signed, and Rondo/Bradley/JO/Vet won't be enough to snag them both, unfortunately. Plus, that's a craap package compared to what the league just said was insufficient.Yes but it might be the best deal available to the NOH. The NBA really can't let Paul walk at the end of the year and get nothing so they better take the best available offer. Im pretty sure the Celtics can still trade Jeff Green since he is on a one year deal. He would have to consent and lose his Bird rights. Yeah......in 90 days.
We have less to offer than the Lakers. Not sure how the league can allow CP3 to come to Boston.
I don't understand the Odom trade though. What's Dallas' motive? They let Chandler and Butler walk away to preserve cap space in 2012 and will most likely lose Barea too...and now they are going to acquire Odom who still has 2 years left on his contract.