0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
daldridgetnt David AldridgeTwo sources confirm reports that CP3 to Lakers three team deal has been put on ice, perhaps permanently. Source: "Chris is really upset."Who cares cry baby! Good luck in NO this year ROFLOL!
On what grounds is this getting killed? I suppose I'm happy for anything that puts the screws to the Lakers, but I'm not sure why this trade was so egregious that the owners would see fit to kill it.Am I missing something?
People are p---ED over on the Hornets forums. They actually liked the Lakers deal. It seems like no one over there is even considering the celts deal. Theyre all saying the only good thing that could come out of the deal being held up, is if the clips and warriors sweeten their deals. Boston really isnt even in the running to them.
Quote from: Atzar on December 08, 2011, 09:18:56 PMOn what grounds is this getting killed? I suppose I'm happy for anything that puts the screws to the Lakers, but I'm not sure why this trade was so egregious that the owners would see fit to kill it.Am I missing something?Because the trade is blatantly unfair?
Quote from: dtrader on December 08, 2011, 09:16:30 PMPeople are p---ED over on the Hornets forums. They actually liked the Lakers deal. It seems like no one over there is even considering the celts deal. Theyre all saying the only good thing that could come out of the deal being held up, is if the clips and warriors sweeten their deals. Boston really isnt even in the running to them.Not even in the running?!!?!?!....didn't they hear about CP3 being scheduled for a physical for tomorrow here in Boston earlier in the day before NO made their last round of calls to give teams a last chance before NO finalized the Cs offer???
Quote from: beantownboy171 on December 08, 2011, 09:24:29 PMQuote from: Atzar on December 08, 2011, 09:18:56 PMOn what grounds is this getting killed? I suppose I'm happy for anything that puts the screws to the Lakers, but I'm not sure why this trade was so egregious that the owners would see fit to kill it.Am I missing something?Because the trade is blatantly unfair?Even beyond unfairness, think of it this way: If Danny makes a deal with the Lakers, but Wyc hates it, the deal doesn't go through. Here, the other 29 franchises take the place of Wyc. If ownership doesn't like the return the GM is getting, a trade isn't going to get made.