These swap deals are getting a little crazy though - maybe we should think about capping them in the future.
Why so? It's basically just trading *first rounders*, with one team retaining an insurance policy.
2nd rounders you mean...
GMs should keep in mind that the more confusing you make conditions, the more possibility a pick gets traded that can't be traded and that that voids a deal (and that that voiding happens too late or later after someone realizes it, etc.)
I'm trying to keep track of picks swapped, but stuff like this makes it harder obviously. FWIW, We've had a few GMs ask in both leagues in the threads "what picks do I have...?" and multiple conditional statements just make it harder to track and increase the possiblity of a mistake on someone's part.
Actually the more I think about it I wouldn't mind if we banned the right to swap 2nd round picks. Just be bold and say I want this pick or I'll give you that pick.
I'm fine with it on 1st rounders, but 2nd rounders are generally fliers and get moved around so much more -- i think the Nat's 2nd rounder has been dealt 7 times already and the season hasn't even started. (I'd be willing to bet my own-already-traded 2nd rounder that one of these 2nd rounders that's gotten dealt 6-8 times gets missed by the GM how ends up with the pick during next year's draft).
I'd ask GMs to look into their souls
and ask if the difference between the 31 and 39th pick is really enough to make the headaches for Lucky (and to the much lesser extent me as the backup keeper of the lists).
^^ Just FYI, this was my original post that started this pretzel of a discussion...I don't understand some of the rules that you and TWW come up with...but if it gives you something to discuss, then by all means...keep discussing.
I believe GC was just responding to FairWeatherFan's suggestion.
These swap deals are getting a little crazy though - maybe we should think about capping them in the future.
FWF suggested a cap on number of swaps..but GC took it a step further and suggested a ban. I don't see the logic behind either..yes it increases Lucky's workload..but if that's an issue, then maybe each individual GM can keep a track of his picks instead of relying on Lucky to do that for them. Save the emails/PMs when you confirm deals that include swaps....just a suggestion that makes more sense to me compared to a ban/cap.
I apologize for any confusion I may have created. I went back an reread what I wrote (quoted below) and I can see how it might be misread/misunderstood ....
My intended suggestion was not to ban the *TRADING* of 2nd round picks, it was (and i hope this was clear if you read the full post below),
to disallow the *OPTIONS TO SWAP* them.If Team A has 3 second rounders, I think they and Team B should just agree one which one to trade -- not build increasingly complex conditions that Lucky (or I) have to keep track of and resolve (i.e. Team B gets the middle of the three, but after Team C has exercised it's right to swap).
I was only saying this for 2nd rounders (in part b/c this complexity seems to be unnecessary since the majority of 2nd rounders (though certainly not all) don't make it through their rookie season on the team that drafted them).
This all comes up (and I volunteered to help track the picks) in part because there was a pick in the points league that we couldn't trace back to who owned it fully. There was also an instance in this league, I believe, where there were conditions placed on a pick that were not met and it created a grey area. The GMs worked it out (by sending a player I believe) but it's not like it couldn't happen again.
And already before *THIS* season has started at least one GM has posted that they can't remember what picks they have for the 2012 draft.
I just wanted to avoid a problem in the future and feel like Lucky has enough to do with being the commish of two 20-team leagues.
It's in most ways MOOT b/c we couldn't make a change until the day before next year's draft anyways.