At the end of the day, Perkins was never going to be himself for the playoffs. His lift, movement and speed were about 60-70% of his former self.(if that)He was a liability on defense, and he has no offense.
Thus, Danny faced the problem of having a Perkins at 65% for the playoffs who also wanted too much money once his knees were back to 90%.
It seems, to an emotional fan base, a very hard decision to make.
For me, if Perkins was 100% and this trade was made, I still think it was an okay move at the time, because of Marquis' injury- but I could understand the resentment/shock.
Considering Perkins had come off major surgery and was at least 6-9 months away from being close to what he once was, it's a no brainer, and having Perkins on one leg would not have made a licking difference to our playoff result.
The trade probably wouldn't have been made if Perk was never injured. Once Marquis went down, it was bound to happen with the combination of Perk+Marquis.