Can we or can we not acquire pieces to construct a facsimile of the 2008 champs in the '12 free agency with OJ Mayo and Robin Lopez being a more athletic Ray Allen and a longer Perk respectively?
It's not really realistic to project that team to mirror the '08 team.
Pierce is 4 years older. KG is either gone, or 4 years older. Lopez was terrible last year, and wasn't as good as Perk. O.J. Mayo is nowhere near as good as Ray, and certainly doesn't have his clutch ability.
I think Lopez would be pretty similar to Perkins on the Celtics (if KG is still around). He isn't quite the banger Perk is, but he is more mobile and more a threat offensively. If KG is still around, I think they compliment each other well.
Mayo isn't the shooter Allen is, no question, but he is much more athletic and provides different sort of matchup problems for opposing defenses.
Rondo is better then he was. Pierce is still money down the stretch, but Mayo would definitely have to provide more throughout the course of a game then Allen would have, and I'm ok with that.
With all that said, that team isn't beating the Heat. The Heat are just too good. For the Celtics to beat the Heat in a series, they need a premier player, preferably in the post. Dwight Howard would certainly fill that role.
When the Celts were healthy last year they were as good as the Mavs.
Except for the fact that even healthy, the Celtics still lacked a go-to scorer who could take over offensively the way that Dirk did in the playoffs many times.
Without Dirk being unstoppable at times, the Mavs wouldn't have even made the Finals.
We didn't have a go-to scorer who could take over offensively the way that Dirk did in 2010 and we went to game 7 of the finals. It's also true that Dallas doesn't have our defense. You don't need to be exactly like Dallas to win.
A healthy Boston Team pre trade was a horrible matchup for Dallas. KG is the best option in the NBA for guarding Dirk. Rondo would have torched Kidd on offense. Shaq, JO, and Perk would have been too much for Chandler and Haywood. The Mavs weakness was at 2 guard. They would have no one to chase Ray Allen because that's not Terry's game. Pierce would have been better then Butler/Marion.
It would have been a good series but assuming full health for both teams Boston was simply better and deeper.
Sadly that's not how it worked out.
From what I recall, the meetings between the C's and Mavs in the regular season didn't really bear out this notion that the Celtics were a terrible matchup for the Mavs.
Actually, Rondo tends to struggle against bigger guards who can back him down (Kidd), Shawn Marion would have given Pierce, our number 1 offensive option, a difficult time at both ends (flashes of Artest in 2010), Terry clearly could have matched Ray Allen shot for shot -- not to mention that DeShawn could have played him very tough (again, Artest). Chandler would have taken advantage of our lack of size inside.
Dirk, of course, was simply unstoppable, even for a player like KG. Dirk wouldn't have had to work hard to defend KG on the other end, either (at this point KG is easier to defend than Bosh).
If anything, I think the Mavs match up quite well with the Celtics, unless, perhaps, Shaq is healthy and productive.