Aw hey look, ya did it again!
I've always felt a GMs own line up was relevant to his critique. But you're right I shouldn't lead the discussion too far afield.
So coming back around, my Pacific division rankings subject to change following further debate and an L.A. press conference:
1. Golden State Warriors
2. Phoenix Suns
3. Sacramento Dino-Boxer-Bots
4. Los Angeles Conspiracy
Haha. I always love reading the Walker Wiggle contrarian curveballs. But seriously, what's the issue with the Kings? I'm not somebody who thinks they're an unbeatable juggernaut, but I do think they'll win their division in the regular season. The playoffs may be another story, but Lebron plus a talented supporting cast seems to guarantee regular season success to me.
I prefer crackpot Roy, thanks.

And I'll put my "batting average" up against anybody's.
My quick response: one of the upshots of a twenty-four team league is that greater roster depth balances out star power. (The downside is watching Willie Green go undrafted.) And anyway I've never subscribed to the idea that James or Howard or Bryant equates to the same sort of success in a CB league with far greater parity than the top heavy NBA we know and love. Yes, James is still the league's best player, although he's further tarnished his title. But I prefer both Golden State and Phoenix, 1 through 5.
Beyond that, you, me, IP, we aren't going to change on our minds regarding the
Kings Dino-Boxer-Bots. So rather than face off - and lose - to you two, I'd rather discuss the merits of the Conspiracy instead? See if they aren't getting short shrift before they've even made their case.