I am sticking to my opinion that someone like a Marc Gasol would be better in Boston than Dwight Howard because Howard's elbows, which are allowed to work freely now would become lethal weapons worthy of suspension if used while on the Celtics. I feel that his coaches and the refs have done him no favors by allowing him to freely elbow oponents, to the point of drawing blood, and not doing anything to stop it. It is now ingrained in him that this is OK.
Meanwhile, Marc Gasol is a big man who is improving each year (IMO will be the better player of the Gasol brothers). He has not yet reached the salary level of Howard. He appears to be very coachable. He doesn't stand at the three point line and chuck them up (huge plus in my book), but will play under the basket...more of a throw back center.
Did I mention that his is BIG? (Not just tall...big and tall.)
This sounds like another Perkins/Krstic debate (on a much bigger scale). As in offense/defense.
If I want offense, I take Marc Gasol. If I want defense, I take Dwight Howard. At the same time, Dwight Howard can still get it done offensively because he can bully other centers, easily.
I think his elbow throwing is definitely being heavily overstated, by you. We could say the same thing about Perk with his illegal screens and overall displeasure anytime he gets called for a foul, which is always a potential for a technical. I'd much rather look at more relevant things, such as Dwight Howard's FT shooting, and how he hasn't hit 60% from the FT line since his rookie year, where he only attempted 5 per game anyways as opposed to 11.7 last year.
If I woke up tomorrow morning and saw it reported that Marc Gasol was gonna be a Celtic (let's assume the lockout doesn't exist.....I might need all that stuff you're offering jay after I vomit for the umpteenth time over this lockout), my day would probably already be complete. I'm sure he'd do great for the Celtics, no question. I'd still take Dwight Howard over him, though, any day of the week, twice on Sundays, etc etc.