I apologize in advance, cuz I'm sure you've answered this question a billion times, Roy, but what would you've done about the lack of the backup 3? My memory is far from great, was there someone that was moved at the deadline that we might've had a shot at?
Reports are that we could have had Anthony Parker, and there's some speculation that we could have landed Battier; Houston is rumored (or at least speculated) to be the 3rd team in the Nate Robinson / Brandan Wright trade that we backed out of.
I would have taken either.
If you look at what Houston ended up getting for Battier, it seems extremely unlikely that we could have gotten him. As for Anthony Parker, I'm skeptical as to how useful he would have been. In my mind he'd have been little better than Michael Finley was for us last year, maybe a bit more mobile.
While I can appreciate that you believe trading Perk was too much, I think some kind of significant trade was necessary. We weren't going to go all the way riding Pierce with no real wing backup.
I think the question of whether we could have matched Memphis' offer to Houston depends upon how much you see Thabeet as a legit prospect. Since he's currently in the D-League and hasn't contributed a thing for Houston, I'm not sure that they see a lot of value of him. We'll see, I guess, but I think expiring contracts (including Brandan Wright, and Marquis' deal paid by insurance) + Semih + #2 would have been enough.
Regardless of what you think of Thabeet, if this offers on the table there's no way Danny turns it down. Just doesn't add up to me.
Is it that hard to believe that Danny preferred Krstic + Green + #1 to Perk + Battier minus #1?
I would have much preferred Battier without giving up Perk, but there are a lot of folks who would disagree, based upon Green's youth and versatility.
No question, if Battier were to simply walk through the door as a FA pickup, that would be just awesome.
But the GM's job is to look at the big picture, right? And in the big picture, both Perk and Battier would be likely to leave, and the team would need to reload with fewer assets than the C's have had since the 90's. Instead, we have Green, who, as a RFA under current rules, is likely to remain in Green for at least several years and may bridge to the next title-quality core. Neither Perk nor Battier could claim that.
It is going to get harder and harder to attract FA's of the caliber we would need to make a title run with the current core. Danny is a gambler, as we know, and took a gamble that could pay off handsomely, and it doesn't significantly harm our chances this year (while improving them in the future). It was a good deal.
I wouldn't give up much in terms of assets to rent a player. Battier, and Perk if he were still here, would have been de facto rentals. Instead, we have one, potentially two, building blocks.