Rondo is a great player, but his decision making recently has consistenly sucked. Usually, his decision making only ocassionally sucks.
Not taking a fastbreak layup in the open court in the 4th quarter of a close game= bad decision.
Gambling too much on defense to get steals instead of moving his feet like he is capable of= bad decision.
Making high degree of difficulty flashy passes in situations that don't require this type of pass= bad decision.
Taking jumpshots in the 4th quarter of close games early in the shot clock when he is a poor jumpshooter= bad decision.
Taking much too long to get into offensive sets and wasting the majority of the shot clock= bad decision.
Taking a tough floater at the end of a 4th quarter of a close game when you are 2-11= bad decision.
I don't know if these bad decisions are the result of a bad attitude or laziness, and I don't care. It's irrelevant to me.
As much as I am bashing the guy, I believe that he will come out of this and start playing better. I have confidence in the guy.
But I do feel more comfortable having Delonte around, because if he plays like this in the playoffs he'll get benched by Doc and rightfully so.
TP. Good analysis, and one I generally share. Don't sweat the comparative lists of errors, because comparing Garnett's with Rondo's is apples to oranges. Rondo's job is to control and distribute the basketball to the others, totally different than the Big Three.
It would be interesting to sit Rondo down and pick his brain. From the outside observing his play, he seems to labor with his attention span. There are some games, some opponents, some situations in which he's totally engaged and will generally carry out his strengths - attacking with the basketball, keeping it moving, staying in front of his man, crashing the glass to rebound, steals, etc.
And there are others where he appears disinterested, or perhaps bored - stopping the ball by pounding it at the top of the key, half-heartedly facing picks, playing defense from behind, choosing inexplicable times to shoot.
In a nutshell, I still see the same inconsistent player that I've always seen. When Rondo is engaged, he can be great. When he's not, he's decidedly ordinary.
And therein lies the frustration. I remember decades ago watching Havlicek play 40 minutes totally balls out in an exhibition game against a horrible Kings team. That's the contrast, and it's a frustrating one. Rondo will be as great a point guard as he wants to be. It's the latter issue that concerns me right now.
The good news is that the playoff stage has engaged him in past years. One would hope that the trade isn't a factor in his seeming recent disinterest, because if it is and continues to be, the issue of a trade begins to gather steam, IMHO.