I like this one for Philly. Basically, Iggy is an older, less dynamic Tyreke with more defense but less of everything else. I think Sacramento probably could have done better, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I just hate Tyreke Evans as a player. I don't think he could ever play a role on a contender. He's just too ball dominant, and not quite skilled enough - or perhaps too undersized to pull it off in my opinion. Like a less talented Allen Iverson. I think Tom Ziller elaborated on this earlier last week when discussing the inept Sacramento offense.
Meanwhile, Iguodala's ability to play excellent defense on two positions is a big plus for a team that expects to get a lot offensively out of Cousins & Curry. And I've long believed that Iguodala could be a terrific complimentary player offensively if he was put in the right place to do it - much like he did at the FIBA championships this year.
Regarding Iggy, I'm biased against him after watching him for so many years in Philly, I think. After watching the guy 60+ games every year, I saw a guy who just didn't seem to be able to play to his full offensive potential unless he had the ball in his hands. In other words, offensively he's like a less skilled Tyreke Evans. He's never embraced, or been able to adapt to, a secondary role, despite the fact that he would seem perfect for that type of role. He's a guy who demands the ball, but who definitely isn't any sort of a leader.
Defensively, though, he's got about as much talent as any wing in the league. I love the guy's skills, I just don't think he's put it together like he should have. With Tyreke, I think he's still young and growing, and I think he's going to be tremendous. (The fact that Danny was a big Tyreke Evans fan is another factor in his favor, too.)