Author Topic: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27  (Read 109522 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #330 on: January 28, 2011, 12:47:12 AM »

Offline GrandTheftRondo

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1952
  • Tommy Points: 167
Kendrick Perkins looking better then before the injury.

I thought I was the only one who noticed.

BTW Semih has really come into his own on this team. I was not a fan in the beginning but I really like this kid.

what do you mean 'better'? Like better shape? Better defense? shooting? Not that i disagree, just curious

Better defense and better shape...quicker on his feet. Did you catch how he defended Rudy on that one posession? It was great.

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #331 on: January 28, 2011, 12:47:12 AM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
Nice play by bench!

Extended the lead. Now the starters must bring us home.

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #332 on: January 28, 2011, 12:47:24 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Von deserves more time

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #333 on: January 28, 2011, 12:47:32 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Blazers had 12 offensive rebounds in the first half, only 4 in the second.

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #334 on: January 28, 2011, 12:48:02 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Von deserves more time
He'll likely get it when West comes back with Nate's overall poor play.

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #335 on: January 28, 2011, 12:48:34 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Blazers had 12 offensive rebounds in the first half, only 4 in the second.

Good post. Celts have protected the boards this half.

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #336 on: January 28, 2011, 12:48:48 AM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
Nate may have played himself out of the rotation. Von is basically taller version of Nate.

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #337 on: January 28, 2011, 12:49:40 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Nate may have played himself out of the rotation. Von is basically taller version of Nate.

Von can get to the hoop

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #338 on: January 28, 2011, 12:50:11 AM »

Offline snively

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
  • Tommy Points: 458
If Von could only hit 3s this year, he would have been playing a lot earlier.
2016 CelticsBlog Draft: Chicago Bulls

Head Coach: Fred Hoiberg

Starters: Rubio, Danny Green, Durant, Markieff Morris, Capela
Bench: Sessions, Shumpert, G. Green, T. Booker, Frye
Deep Bench: CJ Watson, H. Thompson, P. Zipser, Papagiannis, Mejri

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #339 on: January 28, 2011, 12:50:31 AM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
Whats more shocking: Von buying into the defense or Erden holding his own as a starter?

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #340 on: January 28, 2011, 12:50:56 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Wes Matthews completely over played Ray for the 3.

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #341 on: January 28, 2011, 12:50:59 AM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
RAY! To the hole!

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #342 on: January 28, 2011, 12:51:18 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
That was a foul.

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #343 on: January 28, 2011, 12:51:21 AM »

Offline ejk3489

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2233
  • Tommy Points: 215
Ray!

Re: Celtics (34-10) at Blazers (25-21) 1/27
« Reply #344 on: January 28, 2011, 12:51:36 AM »

Offline barefacedmonk

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7221
  • Tommy Points: 1796
  • The Dude Abides
How is that not a flagrant?

EDIT: not a flagrant..but should have been a foul.
"An ounce of practice is worth more than tons of preaching." - M.K. Gandhi