Author Topic: Rondo!  (Read 8162 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Rondo!
« Reply #30 on: November 16, 2010, 08:41:21 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
CP3 has a better assist to turnover ratio than Rondo.  CP3 can actually score with a wide ranging arsenal and obviously sacrifices assists to score himself.  I view an elite player as somebody who can do everything well and some things exceptionally well.  But they don't have glaring weakenesses.  Rondo can't hit a 12-14" jumpshot and can't shoot free throws; he's not even average, he's poor/bad at those.  CP3 is an all star on any NBA team he starts for.  I do not believe that is true of Rondo.

  So Shaq (and Wilt), because of their free throw shooting and players like Kidd (and, for most of his career, Magic), because of their outside shooting, didn't make you cut for elite players? I might disagree.

  By the way, if you consider points scored or assisted per possession, Paul creates about 40 points in about 26 possessions. Rondo creates about 44 points in about 30 possessions. Slight advantage for Paul in terms of efficiency, but Rondo probably makes up for it on the defensive end.

Look at Gasol and Howard.  Most view Pau as the superior big in the league now.  Largely because Howard does not have a consistent and dependable offensive game.  

  Well, one of those players has been all-nba three years in a row and top 5 in mvp voting each year, while the other has been 3rd team all-nba twice and received *no* MVP votes in the same three years. Largely because some people look at how much of an effect they have on the game instead of concentrating on their flaws.

  Paul's a great player, maybe better than Rondo, but how many players in the league can dominate a game when they only score 5-6 points? At the end of the day, it doesn't matter that they don't have great outside shots, or that they only scored 5-6 points. What matters is that they dominated the game.

Re: Rondo!
« Reply #31 on: November 16, 2010, 09:24:45 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
He's having a great season so far. I didn't think he'd be able to maintain this level of play for so long (atleast not satistically). With the players he has around him and his mentality it's not surprising his assists numbers have shot through the roof, but 15 per game through ten games is simply amazing.

With that said he does have a lot of great players around him who make it easier. Rondo has more guys he can trust to finish a play than most pointguards. While the assists are great I'm starting to feel like the Big 3 are enabling him to get by while not improving the weaker parts of his game as he should (yes shooting, mainly the freethrows). I still can't believe how poorly he's shooting from the line and watching the Mavs choose to completely ignore him on a crunch time play was discouraging. What's worse is as of right now Shaq is shooting a higher percentage from the line than Rondo (9% higher). Rondo obviously still has some major flaws to correct in his game.

  At this point in time it's more likely that the big three are as successful as they are because they play with Rondo. Rajon does have obvious flaws in his game but he also does some things better than any other pg in the league.

They are both benefitting from playing with each other. Rondo makes scoring easier for them, and they make it so he doesn't have to score. I just hope when the big 3 are no longer around and he has to carry a heavier scoring load he'll be ready. As of right now I don't think he's ready.

Re: Rondo!
« Reply #32 on: November 16, 2010, 10:56:43 PM »

Offline greenpride32

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1310
  • Tommy Points: 83
So Shaq (and Wilt), because of their free throw shooting and players like Kidd (and, for most of his career, Magic), because of their outside shooting, didn't make you cut for elite players? I might disagree.

Look at Gasol and Howard.  Most view Pau as the superior big in the league now.  Largely because Howard does not have a consistent and dependable offensive game.  

  Paul's a great player, maybe better than Rondo, but how many players in the league can dominate a game when they only score 5-6 points? At the end of the day, it doesn't matter that they don't have great outside shots, or that they only scored 5-6 points. What matters is that they dominated the game.


Shaq's inside dominance in his prime had a far greater impact then Rondo passing to 4 future HOF'ers.  You kind of helped me prove my point on the difference between an elite go to palyer and Rondo.  Rondo can't shoot outside or at the charity stripe.  While Shaq couldn't shoot FT's he was a beast in the paint.

When PP puts in 29 points or RA puts in 35, I don't consider the high assist man the dominate player on the floor that night.

Put Rondo on a bad team right now and he wouldn't even be mentioned as an all star candidate. 

Re: Rondo!
« Reply #33 on: November 17, 2010, 01:01:29 AM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
So Shaq (and Wilt), because of their free throw shooting and players like Kidd (and, for most of his career, Magic), because of their outside shooting, didn't make you cut for elite players? I might disagree.

Look at Gasol and Howard.  Most view Pau as the superior big in the league now.  Largely because Howard does not have a consistent and dependable offensive game.  

  Paul's a great player, maybe better than Rondo, but how many players in the league can dominate a game when they only score 5-6 points? At the end of the day, it doesn't matter that they don't have great outside shots, or that they only scored 5-6 points. What matters is that they dominated the game.


Shaq's inside dominance in his prime had a far greater impact then Rondo passing to 4 future HOF'ers.  You kind of helped me prove my point on the difference between an elite go to palyer and Rondo.  Rondo can't shoot outside or at the charity stripe.  While Shaq couldn't shoot FT's he was a beast in the paint.

  No, you  didn't need any help proving your point. By the way, you somehow "forgot" to copy it with the other parts of the post. Here it is, though:

  "I view an elite player as somebody who can do everything well and some things exceptionally well.  But they don't have glaring weaknesses."

  That Shaq's kind of an enigma, isn't he? He clearly can't be an elite player because he had a glaring weakness, yet he was still, well, an elite player.

  I think your point needs a bit of refining.

When PP puts in 29 points or RA puts in 35, I don't consider the high assist man the dominate player on the floor that night.

  No, you probably wouldn't. Ray's 35 points came on 13 made baskets. Rondo assisted 9 of those. Ray had a great night, hitting 7 three pointers. Rondo assisted on 6 of those. You just can't see beyond who scores. And you had 2 chances to see it. In the first game vs the Heat, Ray hit 5 threes, four off of assists from Rondo. But it's not just the assists, or the great defense he's playing. It's the way he's controlling the offense and dictating the pace of the game night in and night out.

Put Rondo on a bad team right now and he wouldn't even be mentioned as an all star candidate. 

  Yes, you've got me there. If you put Rondo on a mythical team with no players that can hit an open shot and has nobody athletic enough to run the break he might have trouble making the all-star team. Of course, once they signed some nba players to their roster the situation might change.

  Say what you will about Rondo, but he's done some pretty significant things in the playoffs for someone with such glaring weaknesses. His game 4 vs Cleveland (29/18/13) was (from what I heard on tv at the time) the only game in the history of the league where a player's led the rest of his team by more than 10 points, 10 boards and 10 assists. In the 08-09 playoffs he averaged 17/9.8/9.7. There are only 4-5 other players who have ever put up numbers like that in the playoffs. And there are only about 5 players in the history of the league with more career playoff triple doubles than he's put up in the last 2 years.
 

Re: Rondo!
« Reply #34 on: November 17, 2010, 01:37:04 AM »

Offline LakersFan_33

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 443
  • Tommy Points: 79
Nice little breakdown of how good Rondo is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5tqdD6kPKs

Btw, this guys youtube channel is fantastic. Great analysis!

Lol easy there, buddy. The same guy said in a later video that "Chris Paul is the best PG in the NBA." Good commentary, nevertheless.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRL9OUfcces

Re: Rondo!
« Reply #35 on: November 17, 2010, 01:56:15 AM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
Nice little breakdown of how good Rondo is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5tqdD6kPKs

Btw, this guys youtube channel is fantastic. Great analysis!

Lol easy there, buddy. The same guy said in a later video that "Chris Paul is the best PG in the NBA." Good commentary, nevertheless.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRL9OUfcces

Why does him thinking Chris paul is the best PG take away from his praise of another player?

I happen to agree with him, and still love rajon.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: Rondo!
« Reply #36 on: November 17, 2010, 12:03:12 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123

Why does him thinking Chris paul is the best PG take away from his praise of another player?

I happen to agree with him, and still love rajon.

  Yeah, it's hardly a slight if you think CP is the better of the two. Paul's career PER is better than any pg in the history of the game.

Re: Rondo!
« Reply #37 on: November 17, 2010, 02:05:08 PM »

Offline LakersFan_33

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 443
  • Tommy Points: 79

Why does him thinking Chris paul is the best PG take away from his praise of another player?

I happen to agree with him, and still love rajon.

  Yeah, it's hardly a slight if you think CP is the better of the two. Paul's career PER is better than any pg in the history of the game.

Not saying it was a slight at all. I'm saying that the commentator was being a little wishy washy there when he was saying that Rondo was the best point guard in the league, and then saying Chris Paul is a couple days later.