Bynum only had a torn meniscus
In the past three years, Bynum has yet to finish a season healthy.
I don't see how he isn't as big an injury concern as Yao and Oden.
That's fine.
For me it's the bone structure that I see as the problem with Yao and Oden. Microfracture surgery and a kneecap breaking apart for Oden without any direct contact? Now add to that a broken wrist playing a physical game? That spells brittle bones and major problems. But as I said, I gave Oden the benefit of the doubt.
But Yao I can't. He hasn't played in a year and a half. Doctors called the injury possibly career ending both when he first broke the foot and after it didn't heal after the first surgery. He broke his left foot originally, had a stress fracture in the foot and then another "hairline" fracture that was diagnosed as possibly career ending. That again shows a bone structure problem that is long term and severely chronic. That I couldn't ignore.
As for Bynum, his first two injuries to different legs were contact injuries. One he landed on Odom's foot and the other Kobe smashed into his knee. these are structural problems. They are just bad luck. I see a huge difference in his problems versus those of Oden and Yao. Huge, huge difference.
How are three seasons of knee injuries not structural?
They aren't structural defects like brittle bones or structurely weak bone areas that have to much stress due to weight and size. Chances are that is Oden and Yao weren't basketball players they would have had injuries in the places they did anyway.
Bynum's injuries were caused because of happenstance. He landed on someone's foot and twisted his knee, much like Perk. Or he had a person barrel into his other knee(his first two injuries were different knees after all). His injuries didn't occur due to genetic weaknesses of his structure.
For that reason and for the fact that he only has ever had minor arthroscopic surgery not major reconstruction surgery, Bynum to me does not have a long term structural problem and would be able to be 100% in the future while the other two SHOULD be doubted.