Wish I could put more thought into this, but today is not a good day. Perhaps I'll revisit later.
No team is without serious question marks here. At the same time, I don't see a whole lot separating these teams. An extremely competitive division.
1. McRoberts aside, I think Orlando has the most depth and versatility in their roster, particularly in the backcourt. Perhaps an overreliance on young and unproven bigs, but enough bodies to find the right mix/hot hand.
2. Washington, too, has nice depth. Injuries are a huge concern, and if the bug bites, then they drop precipitously. But the frontcourt rotation of Scola/Haslem/Bynum is solid. Would prefer more of a sure thing to Greene, if there are minutes available. A lot of scoring in the backcourt, but few distributors, so offense may bog down at times. Also, not sold on the SF rotation just yet.
3. Charlattle is extremely thin on depth. Really a seven-man rotation, as I doubt that any of their bench aside from Blair or Stuckey can be relied on for production. Gay and Amare a serious one-two punch, and will have to carry the team on offense (although some garbage points for Okafor, and occasional jumpers from Battier).
4. Atlanta's backcourt will have problems against the rest of the division (Washington's maybe the least problematic for them to defend). Butler may be pressed into service vs. Johnson and Gay. Okur coming off surgery, and Brand is in dire need of a renaissance. A lot on Durant's shoulders.
5. Miami will get little production from its SF position. Nash will really need to elevate his teammates' play. A lack of frontcourt size will hurt them against the rest of the division.