Semantic alert!!
Should we try to find a way to make certain blanket descriptions like "elite" "average" and "above average" more verifiable? I know everybody has their own opinions on how players relate to one another and that's fine. But at least can we agree on what these adjectives mean when we use them so confidently? For instance, if IP thinks Noah is the 2nd best defensive center in the NBA, that's fine, that's his opinion. But if he reasonably (

) thinks he's more like top 6, can we agree that's not exactly elite?
Here are my thoughts:
Elite: I like my dictionary's definition simply stating "a group considered to be the best". In my opinion, only Dwight Howard is an elite defensive center. He is also the only elite overall center. I think CP3, Deron, and Rondo are the only elite defensive PGs. They are the best and in a class clearly above the rest. When it comes to overall players, I consider there to be 5 indisputable elite players Lebron, Kobe, Wade, Durant, Howard in that order. Are you going to find more than 20% of an unbiased population that will disagree with those 5 players regardless of order? (BTW, interesting fact: The order of those 5 players being drafted in our league went exactly as they finished in MVP voting.)
Average: As a mathematician, I know that an average is something that strives for the "typical" or slightly less accurately the "middle" of a data set. So, if we say a player is an "average" defensive starting PG, should would rank him probably somewhere between 10-20? Is that too wide? 12-18? What do you guys think?
Above average: I'd say this would have to be a player, at his respective position, ranked just outside of the elite and going down to the upper bound of whatever "average" is. Well, IMHO, for overall game I'd say the elite PGs are CP3 and Deron. The elite SGs are Kobe, Wade. Elite 3's are Lebron, Melo. Elite 4's are Pau, Duncan, Amare, Bosh, Dirk. Elite 5's are Howard. So that's 12/5 = 2.4 on average players per elite tier. So somewhere around the 3rd best to 12th best would qualify as "above average" to me. (Considering this, I retract my description of Ty Thomas as an above average defender. Potential, yes. Reality, no. I'd still say average though.)
Again, these rankings are all up to your free mind. But, let's hear your agreements/disagreements on my semantics here. At the very least, if we can't agree on common grounds, I'd like to hear people's thoughts so I know what they mean when they use these blanket adjectives. Funny to think I'm a math teacher, huh? You'd be surprised how particular in language math can get. It's where I learned and will never forget the distinction between "thus" and "therefore".