Author Topic: Another look at Miami's depth  (Read 13036 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Another look at Miami's depth
« on: July 17, 2010, 04:47:11 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Miami is close to adding Juwan Howard, Jamal Magloire, and Carlos Arroyo.  That brings their roster to:

C: J. Anthony / Big Z / Magloire / D. Pittman (r)
PF: Bosh / Haslem / J. Howard / J. Varnado (r)
SF: Lebron / M. Miller / Da'Sean Butler (r)
SG: D. Wade
PG: Chalmers / Arroyo

I think Varnado and Butler are still unsigned, and I'm not sure if Miami expects to bring them in.  Assuming they do, that will place the Heat's roster at 14 players, and thus nearly complete.

What do you think?  Is this team still perceived to be paper thin?  Guys like Howard, Magloire, and Arroyo don't scare me, but all are okay depth.  The one weakness is at backup wing; Miller may be forced to the bench by default, as nobody else on the team can really defend the 2/3.

Currently, the Miami bench overall is a weakness, but is it a big enough one to prevent them from a title? 

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2010, 04:49:49 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
I am pretty impressed with the roster they have put together so quickly, given the salary limitations.  The key will be how this team defends. Points will come pretty easily. Don't know if they will be able to do that very well.

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2010, 05:07:59 PM »

Offline nba is the worst

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 836
  • Tommy Points: 75
I hadn't heard that Arroyo, Howard, and Magliore were signed - have they officially reached agreement?

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2010, 05:11:02 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52857
  • Tommy Points: 2569
The supporting cast is very good.

Need to upgrade Joel Anthony (sometime in the future) in order to build an excellent supporting cast.

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2010, 05:15:00 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
not sure i like chalmers as the starting PG...i can see a line up of:

P Forward: James
SG Wade
SF Miller
PF Bosh
C Anthony or someone better

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2010, 05:16:25 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52857
  • Tommy Points: 2569
I think a bench needs only three players -- a big, a wing and a guard -- to build a rotation.

(1) Main backup big man = Haslem = top 10 player?
(2) Lead Backup Wing = Miller = top 5?
(3) Main backup guard = Arroyo = below average but serviceable? 16-22nd range?

That would be my initial estimate of their ranks lead wide in that position/role.

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2010, 05:39:44 PM »

Offline CoachBo

  • NCE
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6069
  • Tommy Points: 336
That team will not win a title.

Period.
Coined the CelticsBlog term, "Euromistake."

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2010, 05:45:10 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52857
  • Tommy Points: 2569
That team will not win a title.

Period.
Why so?

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2010, 05:49:14 PM »

Offline CoachBo

  • NCE
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6069
  • Tommy Points: 336
Depth is inadequate.

And that's assuming - which you cannot - that the club has any remote chance at developing a chemistry. Basketball is a team game. FAR too many casual fans think titles are won by accumulating the best collection of basketball cards. They would be wrong.

You should examine the track record of James and his ego, Wade and his ego, and Bosh and his soft, soft, soft career. Don't let ESPN tell you what to think.

I tend to take Coach K more seriously than ESPN, and he's on the record indicting James ability to tone his game and his ego down for anyone.
Coined the CelticsBlog term, "Euromistake."

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #9 on: July 17, 2010, 06:09:58 PM »

Offline cdif911

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4868
  • Tommy Points: 43
they are the team to beat, but are beatable yes.

depth will develop based off of how the team plays

MJ's teams didn't have depth in the sense that if you took him (and Pippen) off the teams they would have been horrid - the benches were made because MJ was the man and drew double and triple teams and specialists could come in and shine

A guy like Reggie Evans on this heat team would scare the poo out of me because there would be no pressure on him - just go out and get boards
When you love life, life loves you right back


Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #10 on: July 17, 2010, 07:17:56 PM »

Offline FrDrake

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 412
  • Tommy Points: 43
Miami's small lineup is what is really scary:

C...Bosh
PF...LeBron
SF...Miller
SG...Wade
pg...Chalmers

They will blow teams out of the water with that unit.

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #11 on: July 17, 2010, 07:38:04 PM »

Offline jacksmedulaoblongata

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 121
  • Tommy Points: 10
When you've beaten everyone, then you become the team to beat, not before.

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #12 on: July 17, 2010, 08:26:05 PM »

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16178
  • Tommy Points: 1407
Maybe I am just a hater, but I still see Center and Point Guards as major problems for them. I would have been more impressed to see them bring back Jermaine O'neal or even Brad miller instead of Mike Miller and then signing a less expensive wing like Tony Allen. Big Z should not be counted on for anything, he is one injury away from retirement and is 35 years old. Arroyo I am not sure why he is in the league. Chalmers was so bad at PG in the playoffs they had to have Wade bring up the ball. Then we have Juwan Howard? Magloire? Magloire has been in free fall for the last 4 seasons. Howard had a nice season for the blazers, but turns 38 during the season. No wonder Penny thinks they might sign them.

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #13 on: July 17, 2010, 09:07:21 PM »

Offline Dybdal

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 620
  • Tommy Points: 31
I think everyone can agree that Miami wont have a great bench this year but looking at Orlando and the Lakers that could be added opon with 1-2 years of free agency.

What i would like to debate, is not what they would/should do now.. but what would YOU do, in the next offseason? ergo.. set miami's ideal realistic starting 5 plus bench after next years free agency.
"Leadership is diving for a loose ball, getting the crowd involved, getting other players involved. It`s being able to take it as well as dish it out. That`s the only way you`re going to get respect from the players"

- Larry Bird

Re: Another look at Miami's depth
« Reply #14 on: July 17, 2010, 09:26:06 PM »

Offline Rashi

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 578
  • Tommy Points: 59
When you've beaten everyone, then you become the team to beat, not before.

+1

Going into the off season for me the team to beat was Lakers. When making the moves in the summer, the C's had to keep in mind that they get players that are capable of going against the Laker's bigs.

And I still believe Lakers are the team to beat, and as of right now Heat don't have much depth at the front court. Lakers have the best front court in the league, and if Bynum is healthy.....Pau and Bynum will chew up Bosh + w/e center they have and spit em out.


Lenght is very important, and at the moment, the Heat don't have much of it.