Author Topic: C's considering bringing Eddie House back  (Read 22150 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: C's considering bringing Eddie House back
« Reply #75 on: July 11, 2010, 03:45:32 AM »

Offline bronco_4_ever

  • JD Davison
  • Posts: 3
  • Tommy Points: 0
eddie house is more useful. He got more playing time than nate in boston eddie house played better than nate robinson in his time in boston. And the boston celtics play better when house was in boston. Ray allen and Rondo knew how important eddie was to the team through there disapointment of his departure. BOSTON NEED EDDIE HOUSE

Re: C's considering bringing Eddie House back
« Reply #76 on: July 11, 2010, 04:33:17 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7680
  • Tommy Points: 447
Look, Eddie was great here..but his time has passed. We need more than a shooter for an extra guy. Nate can do way more...Nate's D is top notch, fast, layups, dunks, shooting...what are you thinking..nostalgia....quit that junk...An extra guard....need a taller, or faster guy with better D..look who is coming our way....defense, defense and defense...isn't he going to take Avery's minutes..? If so..????  Dumb stuff..draft em and sit em...duh. That is how you end up with old guys.....Better to have extra big guys than extra shooters..Eddie will find a home.  We need 2 more 6'10" guys here.what dream next..tyron lue..sam cassell...WE NEED HEIGHT, youth, and athletic ability....

Copy that. Eddie's ship has saled. Would rather sign Nate.
yep.

Re: C's considering bringing Eddie House back
« Reply #77 on: July 11, 2010, 09:26:25 AM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
eddie house is more useful. He got more playing time than nate in boston eddie house played better than nate robinson in his time in boston. And the boston celtics play better when house was in boston. Ray allen and Rondo knew how important eddie was to the team through there disapointment of his departure. BOSTON NEED EDDIE HOUSE

That's because for some reason Doc didn't trust Nate, even after her performed pretty well when given the chance.  I think we win game 7 if Doc had trusted Nate more.  We needed scoring and Nate only played 4 minutes. >:(  I think with a full season with the team and trust from Doc, Nate will take off and be very valuable.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: C's considering bringing Eddie House back
« Reply #78 on: July 11, 2010, 09:36:59 AM »

Offline MBz

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2203
  • Tommy Points: 30
I loved Eddie, but he's nothing more than a 9th man.  For the vet min, I'd sign him to help fill out the roster.  It's really a win-win bringing him back.  Good PR move as I think most fans really loved him and it gives you a sniper off the bench.
do it

Re: C's considering bringing Eddie House back
« Reply #79 on: July 11, 2010, 11:04:15 AM »

Offline Greenbean

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3739
  • Tommy Points: 418
Eddie's weakness, his defense, will become more glaring as he gets older. Nate showed he can defend while providing the same scoring punch. He even showed a knck for finding the open man with some nice passing. Nate is just the more dynamic player at this point.

Eddie was amazing when he was on his game shooting the ball. Gotta let go though I think.

Re: C's considering bringing Eddie House back
« Reply #80 on: July 11, 2010, 11:07:09 AM »

Offline Meadowlark_Scal

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8193
  • Tommy Points: 670
  • You say when......
eddie house is more useful. He got more playing time than nate in boston eddie house played better than nate robinson in his time in boston. And the boston celtics play better when house was in boston. Ray allen and Rondo knew how important eddie was to the team through there disapointment of his departure. BOSTON NEED EDDIE HOUSE

That's because for some reason Doc didn't trust Nate, even after her performed pretty well when given the chance.  I think we win game 7 if Doc had trusted Nate more.  We needed scoring and Nate only played 4 minutes. >:(  I think with a full season with the team and trust from Doc, Nate will take off and be very valuable.


That is docs achillies heel, he can't trust or try anyone new for more than 10 minutes..even if and when they produce what we want, he still will bench them. Nate is our man.

Re: C's considering bringing Eddie House back
« Reply #81 on: July 11, 2010, 08:46:13 PM »

Offline bronco_4_ever

  • JD Davison
  • Posts: 3
  • Tommy Points: 0
I rather have house because of jis shooting ability thats all. Yes nate is a better defender but eddie house scores more points with his unbelievabe quick release.