does anyone actually think we would be better with adding Lee while subtracting Ray Allen? I sure don't.
Trading Ray for Lee won't make the C's better, but if you add Mike Miller it will. Lee is a very good rebounder. He starts the fast break with his rebounding and can finish on the break. The C's are at their best when they can play great D force a bad shot
GRAB THE REBOUND and get out on the break,Lee fits perfectly .
Mike Miller would give you a SG who is 5 years younger than Ray, shoots great % fro FG,3's and FT's. He is also a very capable defender and rebounder. He is not Ray Allen , but a poor mans version of Ray. Good enough to start on a championship team IMO
PG: Rondo. / Vet min or Nate
SG: Miller / TA
SF: PP. / Vet min
PF Lee. / BBD
C: KG. / vet min / Perk
I don't care that he is only 6'9 the kid can ball. Tommy would have a new favorite player for sure.