Author Topic: Should Robinson Play?  (Read 8761 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #15 on: May 27, 2010, 06:59:58 PM »

Offline get_banners

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1848
  • Tommy Points: 100
nate should get some minutes to give rondo a breather. rajon's clearly not 100%, and he needs every second of rest he can get.

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #16 on: May 27, 2010, 07:23:11 PM »

Offline More Banners

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3845
  • Tommy Points: 257
I'd have to say yes.

Playing 38ish minutes is one thing.  Playing that amount in the ECF is another.  Playing that amount as the guy that makes the offense run is something else.  And playing 38 minutes in the ECF while bringing it up/running the offense/bouncing off DHoward AND chasing a guy around double screens and off s/r plays all night is a bit much to ask, even for a young fella like Rondo.  Talent only helps so much when a player is gassed and beat up.

The fact is, when Nate went in, the speed went up, and the energy at that position went up considerably over both Rondo and TA.  It was the only time in 2 games that we had more energy at the position than Orlando, and we need that to be able to win.  The 3pt threat helps even more.  6 more fouls, too.  And a few extra minutes of rest for Rondo will make him more effective as well.

It's not a tough call. Nate should get 10-15 minutes.

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #17 on: May 27, 2010, 07:53:53 PM »

Offline JBcat

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3708
  • Tommy Points: 515
What do you guys think of Nate and Rondo playing together at certain times?

If Tony is very limited because of the ankle, Daniels out, Finley not very productive I think it's not a bad idea.   In my opinion Rondo still has to play 40 plus minutes for us to win however if you play them together push the tempo it could open things up offensively for us as well as give Pierce and Ray a breather.   Defensively it might pose us some problems.   You can give Rondo a break at times from guarding Nelson and put Nate on him and have Rondo cover Barnes or Reddick depending on who is in the game.   With Rondo's quickness he can get up under these shooters to bother them.   It is a size mismatch so if you see Barnes or Reddick posting up too much taking advantage of it then stop the plan immediately. 

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #18 on: May 27, 2010, 07:54:24 PM »

Offline radiohead

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7703
  • Tommy Points: 1381
I think 7-10 minutes would be a fair amount of playing time for Nate, give and take a few more depending on how bad/good he plays. We were fine in the first 3 games with Rondo and TA alternating at the point. However, the past 2 games were bad. Rondo seems to be injured a bit and tired. Nate is a streaky player and an energy guy. Maybe give him some minutes early in the game to see what he can do? Something like the last 2 minutes of the first quarter to the first 2-3 minutes of the second?














 

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #19 on: May 27, 2010, 09:06:25 PM »

Offline Meadowlark_Scal

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8193
  • Tommy Points: 670
  • You say when......
I was thinking about it today, if TA is healthy, why not TA, Rondo, Nate..SHEED and Sheldon, now there you, have fast break speed, shooters, REBOUNDERS, offensive ones, remember when they mattered..?  But for sure Nate should get some minutes...gotta remember what i always say....things happen....you never know when you are going to need THE BACKUP GUY....sooooo, keep him in the flow of the play offs.....! And i have to say it....play sheldon....does anybody on this team TRY for offensive rebounds anymore..? All i see is the ball goes up, before it hits rim, our guys are over halfcourt......lazy, or tired.....or...?

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #20 on: May 27, 2010, 09:27:28 PM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11472
  • Tommy Points: 5352
  • Thumper of the BASS!
time for nate?...nope...love to see him....cut tony's time? no...

at all times ray or rondo is on the floor...

which means lil or no nate

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #21 on: May 27, 2010, 10:26:25 PM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
time for nate?...nope...love to see him....cut tony's time? no...

at all times ray or rondo is on the floor...

which means lil or no nate

Tony probably won't play.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #22 on: May 27, 2010, 10:43:29 PM »

Offline HYPE.

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 220
  • Tommy Points: 60
  • There can only be one.
This reminds me of the Stephon Marbury situation from last year's Playoffs. People were saying that he had a chance to win a game for us or at least create an offensive spark.

IIRC, during Game 5 of the Magic series, we were tied with the Magic at 2 games apiece in the series and we were down by a significant amount of points. Doc hadn't put Marbury in too much prior to that game, just like with Nate-Rob, but out of desperation, he decided to sub him in for Rondo (I think). Like people had predicted, Marbury scored 12 points in the quarter to give us the lead, and ultimately, the win. Eventually, we ended up losing that series, but the point is, I feel the Robinson could have a similar, if not, an even bigger impact than Stephon Marbury had on that game.

Unlike Starbury, however, Robinson is lightning-quick and gives us a little production on the defensive end.

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #23 on: May 28, 2010, 11:36:43 PM »

Offline HYPE.

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 220
  • Tommy Points: 60
  • There can only be one.
This reminds me of the Stephon Marbury situation from last year's Playoffs. People were saying that he had a chance to win a game for us or at least create an offensive spark.

IIRC, during Game 5 of the Magic series, we were tied with the Magic at 2 games apiece in the series and we were down by a significant amount of points. Doc hadn't put Marbury in too much prior to that game, just like with Nate-Rob, but out of desperation, he decided to sub him in for Rondo (I think). Like people had predicted, Marbury scored 12 points in the quarter to give us the lead, and ultimately, the win. Eventually, we ended up losing that series, but the point is, I feel the Robinson could have a similar, if not, an even bigger impact than Stephon Marbury had on that game.

Unlike Starbury, however, Robinson is lightning-quick and gives us a little production on the defensive end.
What'd I tell you guys?

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #24 on: May 28, 2010, 11:46:48 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
TPs to yall that said Nate would be there tonight. Great call.

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #25 on: May 28, 2010, 11:48:08 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
If Nate plays like that -- and I'm talking defense and passing more than scoring -- then he belongs in the rotation against LA (or PHX).

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2010, 12:08:28 AM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
I say yes.  I don't think I'd go as far as to try to create minutes for him by playing Rondo at the 2.  However, I'd give him 5-10 mpg by taking TA's point guard minutes away and giving Rondo a few more minutes of rest.

If he plays another game like this, then maybe we can talk about trying to get creative. 

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #27 on: May 29, 2010, 12:10:11 AM »

Offline Actionjakson

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 313
  • Tommy Points: 25
I say yes.  I don't think I'd go as far as to try to create minutes for him by playing Rondo at the 2.  However, I'd give him 5-10 mpg by taking TA's point guard minutes away and giving Rondo a few more minutes of rest.

If he plays another game like this, then maybe we can talk about trying to get creative. 

I agree. Giving him some run to give RR some rest is a great idea. He has endless energy and i think 10 mins of back up point will help this team greatly
“We don't see ourselves as four All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.”
- Rasheed Wallace

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #28 on: May 29, 2010, 12:13:26 AM »

Offline Bossco

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 254
  • Tommy Points: 54
Of course he should play - that is why they traded for him. doc said all along that Nate would help us win a playoff game. My question is how many games could he have helped us win if doc had only let him play?

When things are going well doc's coaching is great, but when we hit a few bumps in the road and there are personnel adjustments to be made they are often made for him by injuries and foul trouble. = Nate only gets in the game because Rondo got hurt.

Re: Should Robinson Play?
« Reply #29 on: May 29, 2010, 12:23:15 AM »

Offline gar

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2629
  • Tommy Points: 247
  • Strength from Within
Did not like Tony's offense this last game. He was not moving the ball well, did not make key passes and was forcing things. Nate seemed to be be more in the flow. Would like to see Nate with Ray rather than Tony.