0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Roy Hobbs on May 16, 2010, 06:18:42 PMQuote from: RJ87 on May 16, 2010, 06:16:08 PMQuote from: tgreanier on May 16, 2010, 06:13:25 PMQuote from: RJ87 on May 16, 2010, 06:08:05 PMEven if we hold onto to win this game, Orlando has the momentum going into game 2Hey, Negative Nancy..so did Cleveland.Not being negative, just stating the obvious. Blowing them out by 20 would've been far more devastating than beating them by 3 or 4.I'm just not sure that there's that much carryover between games. Cleveland should have had the momentum after Games 1 and 3; we should have had it after Game 2. In each such game, the team with the momentum lost fairly handily. Assuming we close this out, we took home court advantage back. That's the only result that really matters.But Orlando's a different animal than Cleveland... So far everyone has said that they "haven't been tested yet" and "they haven't had any adversity" and they may panic under pressure. Well, now they've taken a punch and were able to bounce back, even if they lose - they can take something positive away.HUGE FT's by Ray there.
Quote from: RJ87 on May 16, 2010, 06:16:08 PMQuote from: tgreanier on May 16, 2010, 06:13:25 PMQuote from: RJ87 on May 16, 2010, 06:08:05 PMEven if we hold onto to win this game, Orlando has the momentum going into game 2Hey, Negative Nancy..so did Cleveland.Not being negative, just stating the obvious. Blowing them out by 20 would've been far more devastating than beating them by 3 or 4.I'm just not sure that there's that much carryover between games. Cleveland should have had the momentum after Games 1 and 3; we should have had it after Game 2. In each such game, the team with the momentum lost fairly handily. Assuming we close this out, we took home court advantage back. That's the only result that really matters.
Quote from: tgreanier on May 16, 2010, 06:13:25 PMQuote from: RJ87 on May 16, 2010, 06:08:05 PMEven if we hold onto to win this game, Orlando has the momentum going into game 2Hey, Negative Nancy..so did Cleveland.Not being negative, just stating the obvious. Blowing them out by 20 would've been far more devastating than beating them by 3 or 4.
Quote from: RJ87 on May 16, 2010, 06:08:05 PMEven if we hold onto to win this game, Orlando has the momentum going into game 2Hey, Negative Nancy..so did Cleveland.
Even if we hold onto to win this game, Orlando has the momentum going into game 2
Quote from: Roy Hobbs on May 16, 2010, 06:18:42 PMQuote from: RJ87 on May 16, 2010, 06:16:08 PMQuote from: tgreanier on May 16, 2010, 06:13:25 PMQuote from: RJ87 on May 16, 2010, 06:08:05 PMEven if we hold onto to win this game, Orlando has the momentum going into game 2Hey, Negative Nancy..so did Cleveland.Not being negative, just stating the obvious. Blowing them out by 20 would've been far more devastating than beating them by 3 or 4.I'm just not sure that there's that much carryover between games. Cleveland should have had the momentum after Games 1 and 3; we should have had it after Game 2. In each such game, the team with the momentum lost fairly handily. Assuming we close this out, we took home court advantage back. That's the only result that really matters.I don't think the Magic have created any momentum here in game one. They haven't laid the groundwork for a good performance in game two.