Author Topic: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19  (Read 86244 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #495 on: February 20, 2010, 01:22:38 AM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7375
  • Tommy Points: 570
NBAtv is saying Rasheed now has 16 techs and hes sitting out the Denver game is that true?

Smh
2 got recinded including the one from last night's game according to Gorman.

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #496 on: February 20, 2010, 01:23:37 AM »

Offline tenn_smoothie

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7156
  • Tommy Points: 843
Wow - a HUGE lead on the road against a quality team...have Our Boston Celtics turned the corner?

No - we will know they have turned a corner when they have a huge lead AT HOME against a quality team.
The Four Celtic Generals:
Russell - Cowens - Bird - Garnett

The Four Celtic Lieutenants:
Cousy - Havlicek - McHale - Pierce

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #497 on: February 20, 2010, 01:26:41 AM »

Offline joebianca

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 96
  • Tommy Points: 12
Very satisfying win. I realize there was no Brandon Roy, but this is the kind of game they'd have lost a few weeks ago. Back-to-back in a hostile environment after a big win over the Lakers. Hopefully they can keep this up with two more big games (at Denver, vs. Cleveland) coming up.

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #498 on: February 20, 2010, 01:27:15 AM »

Offline tgreanier

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 843
  • Tommy Points: 154
  • The Patron Saint of Defense
Good game overall....but remember this is 2 games in a row against teams whose best player is injured and hurt.

I have two comments:

1. This is opposed to injured, but not hurt?
2. I did not realize Vujachick was hurt!
Bleeding green for 36 37 years.
"Maybe we do suck. But at least we don't wear yellow."

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #499 on: February 20, 2010, 01:29:21 AM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
Very satisfying win. I realize there was no Brandon Roy, but this is the kind of game they'd have lost a few weeks ago. Back-to-back in a hostile environment after a big win over the Lakers. Hopefully they can keep this up with two more big games (at Denver, vs. Cleveland) coming up.

Good point..and the CLE game is the one I believe that Leon Powe will suit up for...I believe our Celtics will be able to match their intensity and pull off a win, though.

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #500 on: February 20, 2010, 01:30:09 AM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
GREAT WIN!       GO CELTICS!          GREAT WIN!       GO CELTICS!          GREAT WIN!       GO CELTICS!          GREAT WIN!       GO CELTICS!          GREAT WIN!       GO CELTICS!          GREAT WIN!       GO CELTICS!

I hope I corrected the color for you, and I enlarged it.

lol Bahku thought he was on blazersblog.com.

Nope ... I used red on purpose ... it's my way of rubbing the loser's name in it. But no problem ... display as desired! ;)
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #501 on: February 20, 2010, 01:33:14 AM »

Offline MaxwellSmart86

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 918
  • Tommy Points: 144
a few things:

Sick and tired of these PANSY refs with all these WEAK Techs being called ALL THE TIME for ANY reason.

Rudy Fernandez is a FLOPPING/WHINY little girl.

C's play THIS kind of Defense the rest of the way--we're Golden.


Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #502 on: February 20, 2010, 01:34:26 AM »

Offline buellj814

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 494
  • Tommy Points: 74
Very satisfying win. I realize there was no Brandon Roy, but this is the kind of game they'd have lost a few weeks ago. Back-to-back in a hostile environment after a big win over the Lakers. Hopefully they can keep this up with two more big games (at Denver, vs. Cleveland) coming up.
[/quote

pretty sure # 7 was on the court

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #503 on: February 20, 2010, 01:36:19 AM »

Offline Tai

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2230
  • Tommy Points: 32
Very satisfying win. I realize there was no Brandon Roy, but this is the kind of game they'd have lost a few weeks ago. Back-to-back in a hostile environment after a big win over the Lakers. Hopefully they can keep this up with two more big games (at Denver, vs. Cleveland) coming up.

Roy did play. Effectively? I guess not. But he played 33 minutes.

Still, can't say enough about this win. They coulda blown another big lead in the 4th, but they proved they were the tougher team and not only kept the lead, but extended the lead past its' initial peak.

And I'm so glad we didn't trade Ray. I can't apologize enough for wanting to trade him, even if it was only because of his contract.  

So yeah, TPs for all! :)

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #504 on: February 20, 2010, 01:38:16 AM »

Offline joebianca

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 96
  • Tommy Points: 12
pretty sure # 7 was on the court

He was pretty clearly hobbled, but you're right, I misspoke. A very good win either way.

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #505 on: February 20, 2010, 01:41:20 AM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
1/2 game behind Orlando...but are we even going to want home court advantage?  ;D

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #506 on: February 20, 2010, 01:54:16 AM »

Offline Tai

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2230
  • Tommy Points: 32
1/2 game behind Orlando...but are we even going to want home court advantage?  ;D

You mean ahead of Orlando. :)

...At least in the loss column. That matters more long term, for sure.

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #507 on: February 20, 2010, 02:47:57 AM »

Offline fanofgreen

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 579
  • Tommy Points: 105
Good game overall....but remember this is 2 games in a row against teams whose best player is injured and hurt.

I have two comments:

1. This is opposed to injured, but not hurt?
2. I did not realize Vujachick was hurt!

I am referring to Kobe Bryant...injured=did not play
I am referring to Brandon Roy...hurt=played hurt

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #508 on: February 20, 2010, 08:45:32 AM »

Offline Drucci

  • Global Moderator
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7223
  • Tommy Points: 439
Just saw the game. Dominating performance by the C's, I felt like they couldn't lose this one... and then they started to collapse at the end of the 3rd.

Fortunately Baby and Ray saved our butts by themselves and beat the Blazers by themselves in the 4th. Ray was smokin' in the 4th, great, great to see him playing so well again!



A little disappointed by Marquis who didn't do much offensively but he hadn't to, in fact.

Great to see the hustle and energy for 4 quarters and not only 2 or 3, the Celtics responded to every run of the Blazers.

It had been a long time since a blowout but it's really good! 3-0, let's keep it up!

Re: Celtics (34-18) at Trailblazers (32-24) 2/19
« Reply #509 on: February 20, 2010, 09:16:19 AM »

Offline Slugger

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 606
  • Tommy Points: 75
Also just caught the game.

I thought KG looked good tonight.  I think it was mentioned that his movement north-south is looking ok.  His lateral movement will hopefully come.

I thought Tony Allen did a fantastic job defensively.  Perk was a beast again.  Baby come up big with some really nice defensive rotations during the second half.

I thought our team defense was its best i'd seen it in quite a while tonight.  Pauly played well on D too. 

Regarding PP...he really has lost a step or 2 on offense, yet defensively to me he appears quicker????/

Is it an optical illusion?  How can he appear so much slower offensively, yet be improving defensively?