Author Topic: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1  (Read 92695 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #210 on: February 01, 2010, 08:17:55 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
22 FT for the Wizards to 10 for us.

I'm starting to wonder why other teams shoot so much free throws than us in every game. We don't shoot that much jumpshots, don't we? ???

You ever go on an NBA general forum and notice that everyone that's not a Celtics fan spews extra hate about the Celtics? Well, the Celtics are not a likable crew and the refs are human and it seems to me to be leaking into their subconscious, or possibly even conscious. Rasheed doesn't help that.

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #211 on: February 01, 2010, 08:18:03 PM »

Offline butterbeanlove

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1272
  • Tommy Points: 191
As Tommy would say:

*sigh......*

Caron Butler needs to cut the crap, also. What does it say that the open-field tackle on Pierce wasn't called a foul? Just another day in Mr. Stern's NBA.

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #212 on: February 01, 2010, 08:18:24 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Did PP just get pushed to the floor?

No. The ball was stolen and he then fell.

Looked like an arm in his back as he lost it. Must be my green glasses.
It was after, still if you can just shove other players to the ground to get a loose ball...

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #213 on: February 01, 2010, 08:19:06 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Please, please, please don't blame the refs tonight. Celtics once again getting beaten by a vastly inferior team because the bench stinks and the starters just not getting it done.

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #214 on: February 01, 2010, 08:19:33 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
that bad so far?

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #215 on: February 01, 2010, 08:21:02 PM »

Offline Tai

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2230
  • Tommy Points: 32
I really am tired of hearing about the refs. Just make it stop.

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #216 on: February 01, 2010, 08:21:36 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Ray on pace for 42 minutes. Go Doc.

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #217 on: February 01, 2010, 08:21:49 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32611
  • Tommy Points: 1730
  • What a Pub Should Be
that bad so far?

I don't think so.  The turnovers are frustrating but we're still very much in the hunt.  

After yesterday, we could've came out a lot flatter.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #218 on: February 01, 2010, 08:22:08 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
that bad so far?
We've turned it over a couple of times to give them extra FTs and missed 3 easy layups to end the first.

Bad but not completely awful.

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #219 on: February 01, 2010, 08:22:28 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
i take it turnovers are once again killing them?

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #220 on: February 01, 2010, 08:23:37 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
that bad so far?
We've turned it over a couple of times to give them extra FTs and missed 3 easy layups to end the first.

Bad but not completely awful.

11 or 12 turnovers against a 16-30 team and trailing at the half and not awful? What am I missing about this team? They absolutely are playing terrible basketball tonight.

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #221 on: February 01, 2010, 08:23:44 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
boykins has 8 points  :o

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #222 on: February 01, 2010, 08:24:23 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Momentum shifted when we had Allen, Allen, house, Sheed, and Scal out there. Nice to see Doc has booted our only offensive rebounder from the rotation for a stiff.

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #223 on: February 01, 2010, 08:25:06 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
that bad so far?
We've turned it over a couple of times to give them extra FTs and missed 3 easy layups to end the first.

Bad but not completely awful.

11 or 12 turnovers against a 16-30 team and trailing at the half and not awful? What am I missing about this team? They absolutell are playing terrible basketball tonight.
They're rebounding pretty well, shooting efficiently from the field, and have hit their free throws.

If they were playing terrible basketball they wouldn't be doing any of these.

Re: Celtics (29-16) at Wizards (16-30) 2/1
« Reply #224 on: February 01, 2010, 08:25:28 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
at this point....try sheldon...at least he will do the dirty work in the paint