i understand what folks say about how having ray in the line up helps even if he isnt shooting well....and i will agree, but with strong caveats.
having ray in the lineup as a threat to be respected is nice. but having a player who is in the line up as a threat to be respected, AND, can make a high percentage of long-distance shots every night is much, much better.
if ray continues to shoot 3 pts at this rate (32.2%, his previous career low was 35.1%, his career average is 39.7%) then come the playoffs, a good team with a good coach may decide to stop respecting ray's shots and make him prove he can still do it.
while i hope he will burn that team and make his shots, what i see from this season worries me a bit.
so far this year, ray is well out of the top 20 3 pt shooters in the nba in terms of percentages.
as a TEAM boston is shooting 35.5%, so ray's shooting is bringing the team 3 pt% average down.
pierce is at 44.1% and house is at 40.6%. Ray is third, just ahead of wallace, who shoots 3 pt at 30.2%. (let's not count hudson or scal's 3 pt%, both of which are higher than ray's but they are scrubs with a small sample size.)
ray's 3 pt% is not terrible, but it is significantly down from his career average, not anywhere near the top of the nba rankings, and is only 3rd on the team.
how much longer will teams "respect" his scoring if he can not show he is a top shooter? and when might some teams begin to think "ok, go ahead and shoot. we dont need to guard you as was once the case."