Author Topic: Mike Taylor?  (Read 7393 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #15 on: September 12, 2009, 06:10:25 PM »

Offline greenwise

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1117
  • Tommy Points: 136
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQyf2dGXguE

Everybody looks good on youtube ::)

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2009, 06:11:31 PM »

Offline ACF

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10756
  • Tommy Points: 1157
  • A Celtic Fan

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #17 on: September 12, 2009, 07:36:06 PM »

Offline PRIDE

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 488
  • Tommy Points: 41
Taylor is an undersized 2 guard just like Lester Hudson and Gabe Pruitt. He is not the answer at PG.

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #18 on: September 12, 2009, 07:57:03 PM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14114
  • Tommy Points: 1045

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #19 on: September 12, 2009, 08:04:22 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
Quite the athlete more springs then Rondo.

Hudson could be in for a real fight.

The kid has the experience and is still younger.



Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #20 on: September 12, 2009, 08:12:51 PM »

Offline Cman

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13074
  • Tommy Points: 121
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQyf2dGXguE

Everybody looks good on youtube ::)

Looks like we got ourselves a poor man's D Wade!!!!!
 ;)
Celtics fan for life.

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #21 on: September 12, 2009, 08:16:00 PM »

Offline timpiker

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1728
  • Tommy Points: 115
I hope we do get a back up PG and I think he needs to be a very good DEFENSIVE player before anything else.  Rondo's D is not very good in my opinion and I think we need somebody on this team that can play tough D on a PG.


Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #22 on: September 12, 2009, 08:30:08 PM »

Offline Jeff

  • CelticsBlog CEO
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6673
  • Tommy Points: 301
  • ranter
Faith and Sports - an essay by Jeff Clark

"Know what I pray for? The strength to change what I can, the inability to accept what I can't, and the incapacity to tell the difference." - Calvin (Bill Watterson)

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #23 on: September 12, 2009, 08:37:57 PM »

Offline Jeff

  • CelticsBlog CEO
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6673
  • Tommy Points: 301
  • ranter
here's another one (added this to the front page post)

http://www.clipsnation.com/2009/7/31/971449/mike-taylor-waived-by-the-clippers
Faith and Sports - an essay by Jeff Clark

"Know what I pray for? The strength to change what I can, the inability to accept what I can't, and the incapacity to tell the difference." - Calvin (Bill Watterson)

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #24 on: September 12, 2009, 10:25:40 PM »

Offline revcummings

  • Josh Minott
  • Posts: 117
  • Tommy Points: 17
So does this guy have an invite to camp or are some people hoping he gets one?

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #25 on: September 12, 2009, 10:56:38 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Quite the athlete more springs then Rondo.

Hudson could be in for a real fight.

The kid has the experience and is still younger.

That's impressive if he jumps higher than Rondo cuz Rondo can sky.

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #26 on: September 12, 2009, 11:13:23 PM »

Offline Brickowski

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4207
  • Tommy Points: 423
Mike Taylor is probably not going to the hall of fame, but he's head and shoulders above the likes of Tyronn Lue, Dan Dickau, Carlos Arroyo and Lester Hudson.  He has athleticism and skills.  He's a tough kid from the South side who won't back down from anyone.

Is he a better option than, say, Bobby Jackson, assuming that BJax can still play?  Probably not, at least not for this team.
But he's better than the others.

Let Rivers earn his salary instead of pushing buttons.  With good coaching and some additional maturity, Taylor could really turn into something.

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #27 on: September 12, 2009, 11:25:32 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Mike Taylor is probably not going to the hall of fame, but he's head and shoulders above the likes of Tyronn Lue, Dan Dickau, Carlos Arroyo and Lester Hudson.  He has athleticism and skills.  He's a tough kid from the South side who won't back down from anyone.

Is he a better option than, say, Bobby Jackson, assuming that BJax can still play?  Probably not, at least not for this team.
But he's better than the others.

Let Rivers earn his salary instead of pushing buttons.  With good coaching and some additional maturity, Taylor could really turn into something.
Who cares if he won't back down from anyone? That doesn't make an NBA player.

Taylor is a marginal NBA player. I'm not sure he's head and shoulders above anyone.

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #28 on: September 13, 2009, 03:47:55 AM »

Offline Edgar

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24646
  • Tommy Points: 445
  • No contaban con mi astucia !!!
IS this cassels hand
to give us someone good?
he can even told danny
hey you can get from this guy what u got from me that year
I can buy that
will see....as in...we will see..... but i am happy with more people able to fight for backup pg.\


p.s. on stampede he put pretty sick numbers...will bynum anyone?
« Last Edit: September 13, 2009, 03:53:41 AM by Edgar »
Once a CrotorNat always a CROTORNAT  2 times CB draft Champion 2009-2012

Nice to be back!

Re: Mike Taylor?
« Reply #29 on: September 13, 2009, 04:17:26 AM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53417
  • Tommy Points: 2578
The first time I saw Mike Taylor play, he reminded me of a young Darrell Armstrong (before he broke out). Unfortunately, he was just having a good game and some of the skills that were on display that day are very inconsistent for him.

For example -- the poor decision making, poor floor leadership for a point guard, the inefficient scoring, and the poor defense due to a lack of consistent effort.

Mike Taylor is far too raw to be useful NBA player at this point in his career. He's a great athlete + a decent prospect ... but this is a bad situation for him. Taylor won't get a sniff of court time on this team, and that'll be bad for his development because this is a guy that sorely needs game experience.

Edit: When Taylor is on form -- you see very good pressure defense + contagious energy + non-stop pushing of the basketball + good penetrator with a very good handle -- that's why he reminded me of a young Darrell Armstrong.
« Last Edit: September 13, 2009, 04:24:36 AM by Who »