Cavs (48-12) at Celtics (48-14) 3/6

[Thruthelookingglass]

Just made it online, I'm working some magic down here to try and keep the refs honest.  Free BBD!

[Roy Hobbs]

Perk fouled Sideshow!  Eject him!!

[TatteredOnMySleeve]

hahahahahahahaha...we have no chance at a title...its official...the league wont allow it
21-5 ft advantage for the cavs..celtics getting mugged everytime up the court..no call...yawn...it sure is gonna be tough winning it all playing 5-on-8

we cant get a call in cleveland, nevermind, 16 more ft's

[USG]

I can see the headlines tomorrow.

"Celtics player shot in face by opposing player. No foul called."

Pierce is going cold. Not good.

[Chief]

Doc needs to put some subs in.

[ManUp]

We all know if Ray made that it was a no call 

[Cman]

Pierce needs a break.  It is imperative to get him a break.  Still a long way to go in the game.

{EDIT: Okay, I eat those words, nice 3!}

[Cman]

We all know if Ray made that it was a no call 

No kidding -- nice slow whistle!

[Fan from VT]

Ray and Rondo with 4 points combined, and KG out.  Yet, we still have a lead.  I'll take it (even if it should be more).

Kind of misleading, Roy! Wouldn't it make more sense to just say "No points from Ray, KG out, we'll take it?"   

Eh...  Rondo having 4 points isn't spectacular.  I don't really think it was misleading.  The point was that three of the four guys we count on to carry us have contributed very little tonight (and even Pierce is below his average).  Yet, we're still winning.  That ain't bad.

Yeah, I'm just giving you a hard time. In general, I find statements like that misleading...like say that Pierce had 10 at the half, and then just saying "Well, Pierce, Ray, and Rondo have only combined for 14 points..." well, yeah, but Pierce has 10, rondo has 4 and ray zero. Why is Pierce part of that group?!  4 points in one half isn't too far off from Rondo's average.

[Roy Hobbs]

Pierce for 3!!!

Eat it, NBA!

[USG]

PAUL PIERCE!!!

XFD @ Mo Williams flopping on the way up. I'm amazed they didn't call it though.

[Yugocelt]

Paul Pierce, I salute thee, my captain.  

[Roy Hobbs]

Ray and Rondo with 4 points combined, and KG out.  Yet, we still have a lead.  I'll take it (even if it should be more).

Kind of misleading, Roy! Wouldn't it make more sense to just say "No points from Ray, KG out, we'll take it?"   

Eh...  Rondo having 4 points isn't spectacular.  I don't really think it was misleading.  The point was that three of the four guys we count on to carry us have contributed very little tonight (and even Pierce is below his average).  Yet, we're still winning.  That ain't bad.

Yeah, I'm just giving you a hard time. In general, I find statements like that misleading...like say that Pierce had 10 at the half, and then just saying "Well, Pierce, Ray, and Rondo have only combined for 14 points..." well, yeah, but Pierce has 10, rondo has 4 and ray zero. Why is Pierce part of that group?!  4 points in one half isn't too far off from Rondo's average.

How about Ray and Rondo have combined for 12 second half points? 

[Kwhit10]

Way to go Pierce.  Now let's keep this lead up!

[Thruthelookingglass]

Oh HOORAY!  Go Paul!