Author Topic: Joe Smith back to CLE?  (Read 26830 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #90 on: February 28, 2009, 05:36:31 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
who cares what he does. Cleveland is not the greatest force on earth and we just(should be) better than we were to start the season. I think too many are afraid of cleveland just because we lost to them and barley beat them in the first game. We still have to capacity to play lights out d and we will see that again in the playoffs.

i'll feel better if we have home court....

  Everyone would rather have home court. Some people don't see it as life or death.

there's ground between "rather having home court" and "life or death"......I'd put myself somewhere between the two.


Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #91 on: February 28, 2009, 05:37:57 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
not sure if anyone had this idea yet, we could waive pruitt and sign smith if hes bought out so he doesn't goto cleveland.

Smith doesn't want to play for Boston.  He'd rather go to Cleveland.  If he wanted to go to Boston, he would have sought a buyout when the Celtics wanted/needed him.  The fact that he waited until Cleveland wanted him before he sought a buyout is telling (like I said in my previous post).

but the word has been that he has been seeking the buyout the whole time....

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #92 on: February 28, 2009, 06:46:20 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123

  I think they had at least twice the money we had before we signed Marbury. We couldn't even make a competitive offer if money was an issue and Cleveland wanted him.

but if we were actually holding out for Smith, then maybe we could have held more money for him.

  How? By not signing Tony or Eddie or Walker (whoever of those three used the mid-level)?

maybe giving less to Mar...but again, how do we know how much CLE is actually willing to give him?

   We don't know what Cleveland was offering. We don't know what Boston would have offered. We just know that Cleveland had about twice as much money available before we signed Marbury.

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #93 on: February 28, 2009, 07:38:31 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255

  I think they had at least twice the money we had before we signed Marbury. We couldn't even make a competitive offer if money was an issue and Cleveland wanted him.

but if we were actually holding out for Smith, then maybe we could have held more money for him.

  How? By not signing Tony or Eddie or Walker (whoever of those three used the mid-level)?

maybe giving less to Mar...but again, how do we know how much CLE is actually willing to give him?

   We don't know what Cleveland was offering. We don't know what Boston would have offered. We just know that Cleveland had about twice as much money available before we signed Marbury.

and like i said earlier, I think that Smith was enough better than Moore to roll the dice...considering we also are defending champs and have Doc, KG, Paul and Ray that could have been part of the romancing...

and CLE is also already spending almost 22 million more in salary THIS season...

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #94 on: February 28, 2009, 07:41:18 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330

  I think they had at least twice the money we had before we signed Marbury. We couldn't even make a competitive offer if money was an issue and Cleveland wanted him.

but if we were actually holding out for Smith, then maybe we could have held more money for him.

  How? By not signing Tony or Eddie or Walker (whoever of those three used the mid-level)?

maybe giving less to Mar...but again, how do we know how much CLE is actually willing to give him?

   We don't know what Cleveland was offering. We don't know what Boston would have offered. We just know that Cleveland had about twice as much money available before we signed Marbury.

and like i said earlier, I think that Smith was enough better than Moore to roll the dice...considering we also are defending champs and have Doc, KG, Paul and Ray that could have been part of the romancing...

and CLE is also already spending almost 22 million more in salary THIS season...
Is he so much better than it'd be worth risking not signing an additional big man for the playoffs? I have my doubts. Besides back channels in the NBA among GMs and agents are pretty strong. If the Celtics truly were going to get Joe Smith we'd have waited for the buyout to get done. He is going to Cleveland and he was always heading there.

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #95 on: February 28, 2009, 07:43:29 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123

  I think they had at least twice the money we had before we signed Marbury. We couldn't even make a competitive offer if money was an issue and Cleveland wanted him.

but if we were actually holding out for Smith, then maybe we could have held more money for him.

  How? By not signing Tony or Eddie or Walker (whoever of those three used the mid-level)?

maybe giving less to Mar...but again, how do we know how much CLE is actually willing to give him?

   We don't know what Cleveland was offering. We don't know what Boston would have offered. We just know that Cleveland had about twice as much money available before we signed Marbury.

and like i said earlier, I think that Smith was enough better than Moore to roll the dice...considering we also are defending champs and have Doc, KG, Paul and Ray that could have been part of the romancing...

and CLE is also already spending almost 22 million more in salary THIS season...

  Those guys were also romancing McDyess, right?

  You'd be fine with things of Moore went to Denver and Smith went to Cleveland? Because about 1/4 of the posters here would be calling for Danny's resignation if that had happened.

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #96 on: February 28, 2009, 07:47:59 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255

  I think they had at least twice the money we had before we signed Marbury. We couldn't even make a competitive offer if money was an issue and Cleveland wanted him.

but if we were actually holding out for Smith, then maybe we could have held more money for him.

  How? By not signing Tony or Eddie or Walker (whoever of those three used the mid-level)?

maybe giving less to Mar...but again, how do we know how much CLE is actually willing to give him?

   We don't know what Cleveland was offering. We don't know what Boston would have offered. We just know that Cleveland had about twice as much money available before we signed Marbury.

and like i said earlier, I think that Smith was enough better than Moore to roll the dice...considering we also are defending champs and have Doc, KG, Paul and Ray that could have been part of the romancing...

and CLE is also already spending almost 22 million more in salary THIS season...
Is he so much better than it'd be worth risking not signing an additional big man for the playoffs? I have my doubts. Besides back channels in the NBA among GMs and agents are pretty strong. If the Celtics truly were going to get Joe Smith we'd have waited for the buyout to get done. He is going to Cleveland and he was always heading there.

well i don't agree. i think that Danny didn't want to lose Mikki like you are saying, but even Mikki said he was close to going to Dallas....

i think DA prioritized Mar and thought Mikki was better than nothing....

personally, i think that when you combine the amount better Smith is than Moore with the fact that signing Smith would also keep him away from CLE you have a nice balance shift in our direction...

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #97 on: February 28, 2009, 07:53:56 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255

  I think they had at least twice the money we had before we signed Marbury. We couldn't even make a competitive offer if money was an issue and Cleveland wanted him.

but if we were actually holding out for Smith, then maybe we could have held more money for him.

  How? By not signing Tony or Eddie or Walker (whoever of those three used the mid-level)?

maybe giving less to Mar...but again, how do we know how much CLE is actually willing to give him?

   We don't know what Cleveland was offering. We don't know what Boston would have offered. We just know that Cleveland had about twice as much money available before we signed Marbury.

and like i said earlier, I think that Smith was enough better than Moore to roll the dice...considering we also are defending champs and have Doc, KG, Paul and Ray that could have been part of the romancing...

and CLE is also already spending almost 22 million more in salary THIS season...

  Those guys were also romancing McDyess, right?

  You'd be fine with things of Moore went to Denver and Smith went to Cleveland? Because about 1/4 of the posters here would be calling for Danny's resignation if that had happened.

yeah because like i argued previously, if that scenario had happened i would have then gone after Horry or even Pollard...

but i again, my feeling is that we would have won the Joe Smith battle...

and as McDyess, he went to DET because he viewed them as salvaging his career. I wouldn't say that Smith's 1/4 of a season in CLE is the same kind of bond....

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #98 on: February 28, 2009, 08:32:23 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
hey maybe he won't even get bought out. that would be best case scenario.

I'm not sure why that would happen at this point, but we can hope...

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #99 on: February 28, 2009, 09:31:33 PM »

Offline vjcsmoke

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3219
  • Tommy Points: 183
I hope Joe Smith doesn't goto Cleveland.  That will make them even deeper and more dangerous than they already are.  So the C's can't afford to sign J. Smith now?  I would have liked to see Marbur + Smith on the Celtics.  If Tony Allen is hurt yet again, can't we just cut him and sign Smith once he gets a buyout?

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #100 on: February 28, 2009, 10:54:14 PM »

Offline bruinsandceltics

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2691
  • Tommy Points: 130
  • ANYTHING is posssiiibbbbllee
This is Bush League today's article says:

Quote
Presti and Cavs GM Danny Ferry have a close relationship. They worked together in the Spurs' front office and have already executed two trades in the two years Presti has been the Thunder's GM.

Ferry probably told him to wait until last minute so the Celtics couldn't sign him. That's retarded.

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #101 on: February 28, 2009, 11:09:12 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Quote
Joe Smith could be just days away from providing the Cavaliers with a needed talent injection.

Multiple league sources said on Saturday that Smith and the Oklahoma City Thunder are making progress in buyout talks and there is a favorable chance the sides will come to an agreement by Sunday's midnight waiver deadline. It has also become clear that the Cavs would be Smith's top choice if all the terms can be agreed on.

If all the hurdles can be cleared, Smith would be put on waivers on Monday and become an outright free agent by Wednesday morning.

...

As for Smith, he and the Thunder have been exchanging some figures for the last several days. Insiders have indicated Thunder General Manager Sam Presti has been showing some reluctance and has driving a hard bargain.

Smith is still owed about $1.3 million of his $4.8 million salary this season by Oklahoma City. However, there are some indications the Thunder are looking for Smith to give up that amount and perhaps more, which may be what has been stalling the talks.

http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf/2009/02/help_on_the_way_as_thunders_sm.html

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #102 on: February 28, 2009, 11:17:14 PM »

Offline Toine43

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1352
  • Tommy Points: 219
  • "Spare change?"
This is Bush League today's article says:

Quote
Presti and Cavs GM Danny Ferry have a close relationship. They worked together in the Spurs' front office and have already executed two trades in the two years Presti has been the Thunder's GM.

Ferry probably told him to wait until last minute so the Celtics couldn't sign him. That's retarded.
We don't have much to complain about here considering how the Celtics became a contender in the first place - Danny Ainge and Kevin McHale orchestrating a trade.


Eddie House - for THREEEEEEE!

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #103 on: February 28, 2009, 11:21:48 PM »

Offline NoraG1

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1350
  • Tommy Points: 108
This is Bush League today's article says:

Quote
Presti and Cavs GM Danny Ferry have a close relationship. They worked together in the Spurs' front office and have already executed two trades in the two years Presti has been the Thunder's GM.

Ferry probably told him to wait until last minute so the Celtics couldn't sign him. That's retarded.
We don't have much to complain about here considering how the Celtics became a contender in the first place - Danny Ainge and Kevin McHale orchestrating a trade.

Celtics also gave up Al Jefferson in return.

Re: Joe Smith back to CLE?
« Reply #104 on: February 28, 2009, 11:22:38 PM »

Offline bruinsandceltics

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2691
  • Tommy Points: 130
  • ANYTHING is posssiiibbbbllee
This is Bush League today's article says:

Quote
Presti and Cavs GM Danny Ferry have a close relationship. They worked together in the Spurs' front office and have already executed two trades in the two years Presti has been the Thunder's GM.

Ferry probably told him to wait until last minute so the Celtics couldn't sign him. That's retarded.
We don't have much to complain about here considering how the Celtics became a contender in the first place - Danny Ainge and Kevin McHale orchestrating a trade.

We actually gave up real pieces to get Kevin Garnett. Al Jefferson is a future All-Star for years.