Yes, and that's why Moore signed with us. He knows he has a better chance of getting time. But it's still a good signing, because he's better than an open roster spot (or POB). If you would just say that then it would be very clear very quickly that we're all in fact on the same page. We're arguing about nothing.
it's only a good signing IMO if someone better doesn't get bought out that we miss on because we jumped at Moore.
I don't get it. How is the Moore signing connected in any way to other potential buyout signings? If Joe Smith wanted to come here, the Celtics would sign him, whether we had Moore or not.
but we only have 2 roster spots....if Smith gets bought out and we sign him, that's great, but then we can't fill other clear needs...
Several Possibilities:
- Danny doesn't think we really need a veteran point guard, and hopes to sign Smith with the other open roster spot.
- Danny will cut Giddens if Smith says he wants to come to Boston once he's bought out.
- Danny
knows that Joe Smith isn't coming to Boston, either because he's not going to get bought out, or because if he is bought out he'll be headed to Cleveland.
- Danny signed Moore because he doesn't
think that Joe Smith has much of a chance of winding up in Boston. If Smith gets bought out and wants to come to Boston, Danny can't sign him, so he screwed up royally.
The fourth possibility seems to be what you think. You very well could be right, but I'm not buying it. I view the Moore signing as an isolated event because I trust that Danny has done and will do everything in his power to sign Smith.