Author Topic: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions  (Read 44984 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #150 on: April 13, 2009, 12:19:36 PM »

Offline MMacOH

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 761
  • Tommy Points: 129

  Funny how you ended up here from "What is the second spot where Boston is definitely better?  I am just waiting for you to say PG".

I think that's because you were reading that as me being sarcastic when I was actually being serious.  I was expecting people to say Rondo.  He has a very good argument against Mo. 

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #151 on: April 13, 2009, 12:44:01 PM »

Offline EJPLAYA

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3816
  • Tommy Points: 127
This has gone a long ways since I last posted last night!

Here is the key thing that I was trying to point out. Yes we are in the discussion still of the top 3 teams, however I think that based on those matchups that Cleveland is the best of the three. The only reason we won that series last year was because we did a good job of forcing Lebron to shoot outside jumpers and he couldn't knock them down. He is doing a MUCH better job this year of shooting from the outside and playing a LOT better defense than he was last year. This in itself is enough to tip the scales their way. Adding Mo Williams and a healthier Big Z and they are the better overall. Especially when the refs give Lebron "Jordan" treatment.

I am not saying we can't beat them, but I am a lot more confident in our matchup against the Lakers than I am against the CAVS. We have a lot of work to be done to get there though. If we play the Bulls I would sit KG. We can beat them without him and I'd rather have him healthy. Without him being healthy we can't beat the CAVS in 7 games with them having home court.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #152 on: April 13, 2009, 12:58:53 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
This has gone a long ways since I last posted last night!

Here is the key thing that I was trying to point out. Yes we are in the discussion still of the top 3 teams, however I think that based on those matchups that Cleveland is the best of the three. The only reason we won that series last year was because we did a good job of forcing Lebron to shoot outside jumpers and he couldn't knock them down. He is doing a MUCH better job this year of shooting from the outside and playing a LOT better defense than he was last year. This in itself is enough to tip the scales their way. Adding Mo Williams and a healthier Big Z and they are the better overall. Especially when the refs give Lebron "Jordan" treatment.

I am not saying we can't beat them, but I am a lot more confident in our matchup against the Lakers than I am against the CAVS. We have a lot of work to be done to get there though. If we play the Bulls I would sit KG. We can beat them without him and I'd rather have him healthy. Without him being healthy we can't beat the CAVS in 7 games with them having home court.

  Sure the Lakers should be easier than the Cavs, but it still seems to come down to KG's health.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #153 on: April 13, 2009, 01:08:29 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
This has gone a long ways since I last posted last night!

Here is the key thing that I was trying to point out. Yes we are in the discussion still of the top 3 teams, however I think that based on those matchups that Cleveland is the best of the three. The only reason we won that series last year was because we did a good job of forcing Lebron to shoot outside jumpers and he couldn't knock them down. He is doing a MUCH better job this year of shooting from the outside and playing a LOT better defense than he was last year. This in itself is enough to tip the scales their way. Adding Mo Williams and a healthier Big Z and they are the better overall. Especially when the refs give Lebron "Jordan" treatment.

I am not saying we can't beat them, but I am a lot more confident in our matchup against the Lakers than I am against the CAVS. We have a lot of work to be done to get there though. If we play the Bulls I would sit KG. We can beat them without him and I'd rather have him healthy. Without him being healthy we can't beat the CAVS in 7 games with them having home court.

One thing that is overlooked about the way the C's handled Lebron last year is not that they allowed him to take 3's, but they forced him to take 3's, out of rhythm.  Even last year, when he was shooting in rhythm, he was still a decent 3 point shooter. 

This can be best witnessed in the way the C's handled Kobe, whom they guarded the same way, despite his better outside shooting, and had the same success. 

It can also be witnessed in the two home games against the Cavs this year, where the C's executed in a similar fashion to last years playoffs. 

The problem has been that in the two games in Cleveland this year, the C's have simply not executed their defense.  They have not shown the aggressiveness and focus that they showed playing at home, and that has led to Lebron being able to comfortably step into his shots, instead of taking off balance, and out of rhythm shots.

The real question for the playoffs is not going to be how good Lebron is, it is going to be whether the C's can find their edge again, and execute the way they are capable of.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #154 on: April 13, 2009, 01:21:32 PM »

Offline EJPLAYA

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3816
  • Tommy Points: 127
This has gone a long ways since I last posted last night!

Here is the key thing that I was trying to point out. Yes we are in the discussion still of the top 3 teams, however I think that based on those matchups that Cleveland is the best of the three. The only reason we won that series last year was because we did a good job of forcing Lebron to shoot outside jumpers and he couldn't knock them down. He is doing a MUCH better job this year of shooting from the outside and playing a LOT better defense than he was last year. This in itself is enough to tip the scales their way. Adding Mo Williams and a healthier Big Z and they are the better overall. Especially when the refs give Lebron "Jordan" treatment.

I am not saying we can't beat them, but I am a lot more confident in our matchup against the Lakers than I am against the CAVS. We have a lot of work to be done to get there though. If we play the Bulls I would sit KG. We can beat them without him and I'd rather have him healthy. Without him being healthy we can't beat the CAVS in 7 games with them having home court.

One thing that is overlooked about the way the C's handled Lebron last year is not that they allowed him to take 3's, but they forced him to take 3's, out of rhythm.  Even last year, when he was shooting in rhythm, he was still a decent 3 point shooter. 

This can be best witnessed in the way the C's handled Kobe, whom they guarded the same way, despite his better outside shooting, and had the same success. 

It can also be witnessed in the two home games against the Cavs this year, where the C's executed in a similar fashion to last years playoffs. 

The problem has been that in the two games in Cleveland this year, the C's have simply not executed their defense.  They have not shown the aggressiveness and focus that they showed playing at home, and that has led to Lebron being able to comfortably step into his shots, instead of taking off balance, and out of rhythm shots.

The real question for the playoffs is not going to be how good Lebron is, it is going to be whether the C's can find their edge again, and execute the way they are capable of.

I agree that Lebron was able to have better looks, but some of that goes to who we have defending him. We don't have Posey who was longer and able to challenge him more. PP is tired and not getting out quite as well. TA isn't big enough to do much, although that one shot Lebron hit he was right on his hand".

I would just argue that this year it is Cleveland who can say that if they play their game the way they should that we won't beat them, where last year it was the reverse. I'd like to think that we were in control, but their swarming defense is what we had last year that they didn't. Unfortunately in the regular season we lost it. We don't come out and clamp down on teams in the 1st and 3rd like we did last year.  If we don't get it back we aren't getting #18.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #155 on: April 13, 2009, 01:31:09 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
This has gone a long ways since I last posted last night!

Here is the key thing that I was trying to point out. Yes we are in the discussion still of the top 3 teams, however I think that based on those matchups that Cleveland is the best of the three. The only reason we won that series last year was because we did a good job of forcing Lebron to shoot outside jumpers and he couldn't knock them down. He is doing a MUCH better job this year of shooting from the outside and playing a LOT better defense than he was last year. This in itself is enough to tip the scales their way. Adding Mo Williams and a healthier Big Z and they are the better overall. Especially when the refs give Lebron "Jordan" treatment.

I am not saying we can't beat them, but I am a lot more confident in our matchup against the Lakers than I am against the CAVS. We have a lot of work to be done to get there though. If we play the Bulls I would sit KG. We can beat them without him and I'd rather have him healthy. Without him being healthy we can't beat the CAVS in 7 games with them having home court.

One thing that is overlooked about the way the C's handled Lebron last year is not that they allowed him to take 3's, but they forced him to take 3's, out of rhythm.  Even last year, when he was shooting in rhythm, he was still a decent 3 point shooter. 

This can be best witnessed in the way the C's handled Kobe, whom they guarded the same way, despite his better outside shooting, and had the same success. 

It can also be witnessed in the two home games against the Cavs this year, where the C's executed in a similar fashion to last years playoffs. 

The problem has been that in the two games in Cleveland this year, the C's have simply not executed their defense.  They have not shown the aggressiveness and focus that they showed playing at home, and that has led to Lebron being able to comfortably step into his shots, instead of taking off balance, and out of rhythm shots.

The real question for the playoffs is not going to be how good Lebron is, it is going to be whether the C's can find their edge again, and execute the way they are capable of.

I agree that Lebron was able to have better looks, but some of that goes to who we have defending him. We don't have Posey who was longer and able to challenge him more. PP is tired and not getting out quite as well. TA isn't big enough to do much, although that one shot Lebron hit he was right on his hand".

I would just argue that this year it is Cleveland who can say that if they play their game the way they should that we won't beat them, where last year it was the reverse. I'd like to think that we were in control, but their swarming defense is what we had last year that they didn't. Unfortunately in the regular season we lost it. We don't come out and clamp down on teams in the 1st and 3rd like we did last year.  If we don't get it back we aren't getting #18.


Actually, TA is perfectly capable of Making Lebron uncomfortable.  He is actually the perfect option for that.  He has the footspeed to stay in front of him (at least somewhat), while being able to get up underneath him, so that if Lebron tries to shoot over him, he will not be able to step into the shot.

The problem is, for this to work, it means the bigs need to be hedging hard (and the backside rotation needs to be sharp, so Lebron can't just pick apart the defense for layups for his big men), which allows the guy covering Lebron to show him one way, and get on his shooting hand, without giving him the lane (because it is clogged by the big men hedging, and filling on the back side).

This is where they are really missing KG and even Scal.  While Perk is great at this, you need to have 2 big men who are always in the right place (and the guards need to be alert as well for the backside help).  Davis is good at it, but he isn't nearly as good as KG and Scal, and he also doesn't have the size to protect the basket that KG does.  When you are using KG and Perk together, you have one guy hedging on the frontside, and the other filling on the backside, and both can stick on the perimeter, and protect the rim equally well, and it allows the perimeter defenders to be more aggressive, and make Lebron very uncomfortable.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #156 on: April 13, 2009, 01:37:40 PM »

Offline EJPLAYA

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3816
  • Tommy Points: 127
This has gone a long ways since I last posted last night!

Here is the key thing that I was trying to point out. Yes we are in the discussion still of the top 3 teams, however I think that based on those matchups that Cleveland is the best of the three. The only reason we won that series last year was because we did a good job of forcing Lebron to shoot outside jumpers and he couldn't knock them down. He is doing a MUCH better job this year of shooting from the outside and playing a LOT better defense than he was last year. This in itself is enough to tip the scales their way. Adding Mo Williams and a healthier Big Z and they are the better overall. Especially when the refs give Lebron "Jordan" treatment.

I am not saying we can't beat them, but I am a lot more confident in our matchup against the Lakers than I am against the CAVS. We have a lot of work to be done to get there though. If we play the Bulls I would sit KG. We can beat them without him and I'd rather have him healthy. Without him being healthy we can't beat the CAVS in 7 games with them having home court.

One thing that is overlooked about the way the C's handled Lebron last year is not that they allowed him to take 3's, but they forced him to take 3's, out of rhythm.  Even last year, when he was shooting in rhythm, he was still a decent 3 point shooter. 

This can be best witnessed in the way the C's handled Kobe, whom they guarded the same way, despite his better outside shooting, and had the same success. 

It can also be witnessed in the two home games against the Cavs this year, where the C's executed in a similar fashion to last years playoffs. 

The problem has been that in the two games in Cleveland this year, the C's have simply not executed their defense.  They have not shown the aggressiveness and focus that they showed playing at home, and that has led to Lebron being able to comfortably step into his shots, instead of taking off balance, and out of rhythm shots.

The real question for the playoffs is not going to be how good Lebron is, it is going to be whether the C's can find their edge again, and execute the way they are capable of.

I agree that Lebron was able to have better looks, but some of that goes to who we have defending him. We don't have Posey who was longer and able to challenge him more. PP is tired and not getting out quite as well. TA isn't big enough to do much, although that one shot Lebron hit he was right on his hand".

I would just argue that this year it is Cleveland who can say that if they play their game the way they should that we won't beat them, where last year it was the reverse. I'd like to think that we were in control, but their swarming defense is what we had last year that they didn't. Unfortunately in the regular season we lost it. We don't come out and clamp down on teams in the 1st and 3rd like we did last year.  If we don't get it back we aren't getting #18.


Actually, TA is perfectly capable of Making Lebron uncomfortable.  He is actually the perfect option for that.  He has the footspeed to stay in front of him (at least somewhat), while being able to get up underneath him, so that if Lebron tries to shoot over him, he will not be able to step into the shot.

The problem is, for this to work, it means the bigs need to be hedging hard (and the backside rotation needs to be sharp, so Lebron can't just pick apart the defense for layups for his big men), which allows the guy covering Lebron to show him one way, and get on his shooting hand, without giving him the lane (because it is clogged by the big men hedging, and filling on the back side).

This is where they are really missing KG and even Scal.  While Perk is great at this, you need to have 2 big men who are always in the right place (and the guards need to be alert as well for the backside help).  Davis is good at it, but he isn't nearly as good as KG and Scal, and he also doesn't have the size to protect the basket that KG does.  When you are using KG and Perk together, you have one guy hedging on the frontside, and the other filling on the backside, and both can stick on the perimeter, and protect the rim equally well, and it allows the perimeter defenders to be more aggressive, and make Lebron very uncomfortable.

I agree with everything except the first part about TA. You will never convince me that he is disciplined or smart enough to play defense against LeBron. He is a very over rated defender and uses his athletic ability and quickness to often make up for it. LeBron is too smart and the refs are too generous with their calls his way to allow him to gamble. You will see TA picking up cheap quick fouls as he tries to block Lebrons shot. That will not only get him to the line, but the others quicker as we get into the penalty sooner. He is just too big and strong for TA. Quite honestly he is probably too big and strong for anyone. PP is the only one with the strength to have a chance. You just have to hope he can play him for long stretches.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #157 on: April 13, 2009, 01:42:13 PM »

Offline housecall

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2559
  • Tommy Points: 112
I just heard over weei radio KG will not return for the 2 regular season games.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #158 on: April 13, 2009, 02:13:33 PM »

Offline celticmaestro

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4558
  • Tommy Points: 81
  • "Love is the soul of a true Irishman"
If they beat us, Cleveland wont beat LA.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #159 on: April 13, 2009, 02:58:27 PM »

Offline MMacOH

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 761
  • Tommy Points: 129
If they beat us, Cleveland wont beat LA.

Why?

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #160 on: April 13, 2009, 03:01:48 PM »

Offline angryguy77

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7925
  • Tommy Points: 654
If they beat us, Cleveland wont beat LA.

Why?

You dont match up with them. They showed this in teh two games you played.
Back to wanting Joe fired.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #161 on: April 13, 2009, 03:06:45 PM »

Offline GroverTheClover

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1296
  • Tommy Points: 167
If they beat us, Cleveland wont beat LA.

Why?

You dont match up with them. They showed this in teh two games you played.

I don't necessarily think this is true. A team's regular season record against another doesn't automatically translate to playoff pwnage.

I actually like the Cavs chances against the Lakers because they defend much better than the Lakers. As the saying goes, defense wins championships.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #162 on: April 13, 2009, 03:08:37 PM »

Offline celticmaestro

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4558
  • Tommy Points: 81
  • "Love is the soul of a true Irishman"
If they beat us, Cleveland wont beat LA.

Why?

Because I think the Lakers are better and deeper.

And I don't think Kobe would lose to LeBron.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #163 on: April 13, 2009, 03:12:08 PM »

Offline angryguy77

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7925
  • Tommy Points: 654
If they beat us, Cleveland wont beat LA.

Why?

You dont match up with them. They showed this in teh two games you played.

I don't necessarily think this is true. A team's regular season record against another doesn't automatically translate to playoff pwnage.

I actually like the Cavs chances against the Lakers because they defend much better than the Lakers. As the saying goes, defense wins championships.

I dont base my prediction on the win, but how they won. They controlled both those games due to their size and ability to score. CLeveland could not get their offense or d going in either game. It was close a few times if I recall correctly, but they had no answer or ways to shut the lakers down.

the thing is I hate both these teams and I really dont know which one I would like to see win. If this god forsaken event happens, I will be rooting for a roof cave in more than anything.
Back to wanting Joe fired.

Re: You just saw the 2009 NBA Champions
« Reply #164 on: April 13, 2009, 03:13:34 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
gotta go with the crowd here, i think the lakers (as much as i loath myself for saying it) may be the best of the three, doubly so if they have bynum back full strength come finals time.

There just crazy deep, and they can score, and with bynum back, they have alot of height and length to clog up the paint.

thats not to say the celtics and cavs can't win, but if you held a gun to my head and made me pick the best of the three teams going into the playoffs, i'd have to say its LA.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion