ok, let me say that for the most part i agree with this list, but it has some glaring "huh?"'s.
http://www.sportsline.com/nba/story/10977659 honetly, bynum at number 3? are you kidding me?
I have never seen a kid get hyped as much as andrew bynum has. Now, i agree he is a good player with alot of talent,he might even turn out to be great. but he had a 15 game stretch where he looked great last year after a year and a half of being very inconsistant, and he had a major knee injury.
and your telling me this kid deserves to be ranked as the number 3 center in the NBA? ahead of established guys liek sheed, camby, and chandler?
also, shaq is way to high at 4, and chandler is behind greg oden? what? greg oden, who is coming off a major knee surgery and has yet to play a minute in the NBA is 8th, and chandler, who took a huge step forward and plays for a NBA title contender is 10th?
not only that if your tyson, but you had what all the experts are callign a break out year (including the guy writing him up in this article, who signs his prasies), and you drop 3 spots to tenth best center in the league behind two unproven guys, one of whom has yet to play but somehow gets ranked 8th comign off microfracture surgery? what gives cbs?
other bad ones. JO at 7, is this list from 3 years ago when he was last relevant?
shaq at 4 makes zero sense.
as to perk, I think he should slide up 3-4 spots, just because i think the list has 3-4 people who have no buisness being where they are, but i agree with thier anylasis of him over all.
what do you guys think of the list here? im going with intersting, but very flawed, espiaccly with regardes to older players and young hyped ones.