In response to the recent, an appreciated, critiques of my line up:
The worry that my team is a bunch of defensive "sieves". I'm not sure why that would be.
Felton: 1.2 S.A.G with 2 fouls a game. His big man (Okafor) only averaged 3 fouls a game which means PG's weren't exactly blowing by Felton
By the last 2 rounds of the playoffs Stuckey had upped his SAG to over 1 from .9 during the regular season. Also only 2 fouls against against elite opposing players.
Marion and Kirilenko (B-Diddy dunk aside) are proven defenders I don't feel like their abilities need to be reiterated to the point of redundancy.
Blatche, I will admit, is a question mark. But at 21 he was averaging 1.4 blocks and 5.5 boards in reserve minutes. So for a big man, he's ahead of the curve.
I think the worries about how I will deal with bigger teams is a legitimate concern. There aren't many dominate big line ups in our league but one of them is in my own conference, the Magic. And that's why I think Charlie Villanueva was such a big pick up for me. One of the things I set out to do with this line up is being able to have versatility in the line up so I'd never be out of the game.
Against the Magic this would probably be my line up:
PG: Stuckey
SG: Marion
SF: Kirilenko
PF: Villanueva
C: Blatche
I would have Stuckey guard AI so Marion doesn't get torched, and those three would cause as much havoc in the backcourt as Duncan and Miller will cause down low. Also, I lose nothing defensively down low, either way my team is outmatched on the block, but I still have two 6-11 guys rebounding with decent athleticism and am wreaking havoc on their backcourt.